Is PDF_7KZCDN_20260920075513.ZIP safe?
Two of 75 engines identify this new ZIP archive as a Trojan downloader, including one tier-1 detector, but runtime and research corroboration are unavailable.
ESET-NOD32 and Tencent both identify downloader malware, giving the two detections more weight than an isolated generic alert. However, 16 other tier-1 engines did not detect it, and there is no completed sandbox run, host-reputation check, research-rule match, or similar-file history to resolve the conflict.
e93bbd72b0501c7de2…1e4da806697de9Recommended next actions
Before opening or extracting
Do not open or extract it until the source can be verified independently.
If you already opened or extracted it
Stop using it, scan the device, and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts. Get a fresh copy from the original trusted source and verify its exact hash when possible.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
ESET-NOD32 and Tencent both identify downloader malware, giving the two detections more weight than an isolated generic alert. However, 16 other tier-1 engines did not detect it, and there is no completed sandbox run, host-reputation check, research-rule match, or similar-file history to resolve the conflict.
Two of 75 engines flagged the ZIP archive, and their labels independently converge on downloader behavior. One detection comes from tier-1 ESET-NOD32, while Tencent supplies a second, tier-2 detection. This is not strong family consensus because only one tier-1 engine supports the TrojanDownloader family, and 16 other tier-1 engines reported no detection. No runtime observation is available, so execution behavior cannot be characterized. The contacted-host cross-check was not completed or saved, and the external research sources supplied no corroborating hits. These mixed signals warrant isolation and further analysis rather than opening the archive.
What We Detected
Two of 75 antivirus engines flagged the ZIP archive. ESET-NOD32 identified Win32/TrojanDownloader.Agent.IRT, while Tencent identified Win32.Trojan-Downloader.Oader.Vsmw; both labels point toward downloader activity.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so there is no verified evidence showing what the archive or its contents do when opened. The contacted-host reputation cross-check was also not completed or saved. No malicious child file was reported, but child-analysis coverage is not available in the supplied evidence.
What To Do Now
Do not open or extract this archive on a production device. Keep endpoint protection enabled, quarantine the file, and obtain it again only from a verified source; if business use is necessary, inspect its contents in an isolated analysis environment.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- engines.tier1ReportedClean=16, while only one tier-1 engine detected the file.
- externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false and externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0 provide no independent corroboration, although absence of hits does not prove benignity.
- similarHashes contains no prior decisions that could support either interpretation.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Only 2/75 engines detected the archive
- engines.tier1ReportedClean=16
- externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false
- externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0
- brandMismatch was not detected
- ESET-NOD32 tier-1 TrojanDownloader detection
- Tencent independently reported a Trojan downloader
- Newly observed archive with ageDays=0
- No completed runtime observation
- No complete contacted-host reputation result
Quarantine the ZIP and verify its origin before extracting it. Keep endpoint protection enabled and use an isolated environment if deeper inspection is required.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete2 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 2 / 75engines flagged
- 5sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
2 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file, including ESET-NOD32 and Tencent.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
The hash has been submitted 5 times from 5 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
Category: downloader
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
2 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- PDF_7KZCDN_20260920075513.ZIP
- Format
- ZIP
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 292.8 KB
- Last analyzed
- Oct 7, 2026, 3:21 PM UTC
e93bbd72b0501c7de22752e459f196f9b87b14921e00cb197b1e4da806697de9Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
We couldn't fully clear this file. Treat it with caution.
- Recovery step 01
Don't open or extract it unless you're certain it came from a source you trust.
- Recovery step 02
Check where you got it — an unexpected attachment or a random download link is a red flag.
- Recovery step 03
If its origin cannot be confirmed, delete this archive and use a fresh copy from a trusted source. Get a fresh copy from the original trusted source and verify its exact hash when possible.
- Recovery step 04
If you're still unsure, scan it again in a day or two — detections often catch up on newer files.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is PDF_7KZCDN_20260920075513.ZIP safe, or is it malware?
What is PDF_7KZCDN_20260920075513.ZIP?
How many antivirus engines detected PDF_7KZCDN_20260920075513.ZIP?
I already downloaded and opened or extracted PDF_7KZCDN_20260920075513.ZIP — what should I do?
How do I remove PDF_7KZCDN_20260920075513.ZIP?
What kind of malware is PDF_7KZCDN_20260920075513.ZIP?
What is the SHA-256 hash of PDF_7KZCDN_20260920075513.ZIP?
How up to date is this analysis of PDF_7KZCDN_20260920075513.ZIP?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.