File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is Rebirth
One major antivirus engine flags it as Trojan.Win64.Gen.TL0101HM26ZX while 15 major antivirus engines remain silent.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why Suspicious? 7 antivirus engines flag it; nothing else confirms it.
Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.
Treat as untrusted; keep antivirus enabled and avoid running the executable outside a controlled test environment.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't run it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already ran it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
7 of 70 flagged
- Flagged 7
- No detection 63
- No result 5
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 2mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
2 points against it and 2 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
The file is unsigned and exhibits two offensive MITRE techniques plus direct-IP contact. Only one major antivirus engine contributes a malicious label, and the family consensus is weak. Similar import-table fingerprint matches produced mixed prior verdicts, and the generic PyInstaller YARA rule adds limited weight. These mixed signals place the sample in the suspicious band.
What We Detected
7 of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the sample; TrendMicro-HouseCall is the sole major detection, naming Trojan.Win64.Gen.TL0101HM26ZX. The binary is an unsigned 64-bit PE compiled with PyInstaller and shows high-entropy sections but no known packer signature.
Threat Behavior
Ten files it created were inspected; none carried malicious verdicts. No persistence mechanisms or registry modifications were observed.
What To Do Now
Do not execute the file on production systems. If the file is required, run it only in an isolated virtual machine with current security software enabled and monitor for unexpected outbound connections.
Where this verdict could be wrong1 caveat
- No dropped file is known to be malicious and 10 files it created all unknown.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- No malicious files it created
- Medium prevalence with 9 submitters
- Unsigned executable
- One malicious detection from a major antivirus engine
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 15sandbox rule tags
- 3spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 16filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Note: Read the user name of the test computer.
Note: Listed the programs running on the test computer.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Looked through folders on the test computer (most installers do this).
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as contacting a server, but no contacted host was recorded.
Not confirmed: Showed activity a sandbox rule links to file encryption; no ransomware behaviour was confirmed.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as changing how Windows loads code; nothing confirms it.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run
RebirthPub_SaveEditor (1).exe
ed1b9a5baf2fe4568abe3fe890dc8f9a552449c8502eb6d36008f65c398576f8
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
RebirthPub_SaveEditor.exe
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\RebirthPub_SaveEditor.exe"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
cmd.exe
C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c "ver"
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
_ARC4.pyd
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI33802\Crypto\Cipher\_ARC4.pyd
Test run - Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
_Salsa20.pyd
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI33802\Crypto\Cipher\_Salsa20.pyd
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
What this file did when executed
This file was run in a sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Techniques observed in the sandbox
15MITRE ATT&CK techniques the sandbox mapped. Highlighted ones are rare in normal software; the others are common in legitimate programs too.
- T1027· Obfuscated code
- T1027.002· Obfuscated code
- T1033· Reads user info
- T1055· Process injection
- T1057· Lists programs
- T1059· Runs commands
- T1071· Application protocol
- T1082· System recon
- T1083· Scans your files
- T1129· Loads modules
- T1202
- T1486· File encryption
- T1497· Sandbox evasion
- T1497.001· Sandbox evasion
- T1574· Execution hijack
Observed activity
Processes started
3Programs the file ran, with their command lines.
RebirthPub_SaveEditor.exe"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\RebirthPub_SaveEditor.exe"cmd.exeC:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c "ver"RebirthPub_SaveEditor.exe"C:\Users\user\Desktop\RebirthPub_SaveEditor.exe"
Files
15Files the file created, changed or deleted.
- Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI33802\Crypto\Cipher\_ARC4.pyd - Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI33802\Crypto\Cipher\_Salsa20.pyd - Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI33802\Crypto\Cipher\_chacha20.pyd - Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI33802\Crypto\Cipher\_pkcs1_decode.pyd - Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI33802\Crypto\Cipher\_raw_aes.pyd - Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI33802\Crypto\Cipher\_raw_aesni.pyd
Show all 15 entries for files
- Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI33802\Crypto\Cipher\_raw_arc2.pyd - Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI33802\Crypto\Cipher\_raw_blowfish.pyd - Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI33802\Crypto\Cipher\_raw_cast.pyd - Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI33802\Crypto\Cipher\_raw_cbc.pyd - Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI33802\Crypto\Cipher\_raw_cfb.pyd - Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI33802\Crypto\Cipher\_raw_ctr.pyd - Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI33802\Crypto\Cipher\_raw_des.pyd - Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI33802\Crypto\Cipher\_raw_des3.pyd - Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI33802\Crypto\Cipher\_raw_ecb.pyd
Mutexes
1Named locks a program uses so only one copy runs; malware families often reuse them.
Global\OneSettingQueryMutex+compat+encapsulation
Sandbox background — not the file
9The analysis machine's own processes and connections, recorded in every run.
- VM process
services.exeC:\Windows\system32\services.exe - VM process
svchost.exeC:\Windows\System32\svchost.exe -k NetworkService -p - VM process
svchost.exeC:\Windows\system32\svchost.exe -k UnistackSvcGroup - VM process
svchost.exeC:\Windows\System32\svchost.exe -k LocalSystemNetworkRestricted -p -s StorSvc - VM process
svchost.exeC:\Windows\system32\svchost.exe -k LocalService -s W32Time - VM process
svchost.exeC:\Windows\System32\svchost.exe -k LocalSystemNetworkRestricted -p -s WdiSystemHost
Show all 9 entries for sandbox background — not the file
- VM process
lsass.exeC:\Windows\system32\lsass.exe - VM process
svchost.exeC:\Windows\system32\svchost.exe -k LocalSystemNetworkRestricted -p - VM host
162.159.36.2
Files this sample writes at runtime
This file drops 5 children at runtime. None are currently flagged malicious in our cache. 5 have no saved verdict and were not checked; that is missing coverage, not a finding.
- 63d9bbdac4e8e2c95b1a…a57aeeNot checkedno saved verdict
- 75687620596877b0dde4…8dde42Not checkedno saved verdict
- 804c60219443c2ea969e…ff590fNot checkedno saved verdict
- b60ce99ebcb7946fa9b6…fa5c58Not checkedno saved verdict
- 6f6f3d25dad7d864ac3d…737706Not checkedno saved verdict
Chapter 04
Technical details
7 of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 7
- TrendMicro-HouseCall (major engine)Trojan.Win64.Gen.TL0101HM26ZX
- APEXMalicious
- BkavW32.Malware.8EF23EF3
- DeepInstinctMALICIOUS
- Elasticmalicious (moderate confidence)
- MalwarebytesRiskWare.Agent
- SentinelOneStatic AI - Suspicious PE
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Sep 4, 2026, 8:14 PM UTC
- SHA-256
ed1b9a5baf2fe4568abe3fe890dc8f9a552449c8502eb6d36008f65c398576f8- SHA-1
250c5b5eb6fb13115368d2d48d05e1b74479ec79- MD5
8e326f44b2ba228c891a8fbca76bcdf4
About this file
RebirthPub_SaveEditor (1).exe is a Win32 EXE file of 16.0 MB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 16.0 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Aug 18, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 9 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 8.00 of 8
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
7 of 70 engines flagged this file
5 of the 75 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-117 engines1flagged
- Tier-236 engines4flagged
- Low-trust17 engines2flagged
View all 75 engine results
- APEXMalicious: Malicious
- BkavMalicious: W32.Malware.8EF23EF3
- DeepInstinctMalicious: MALICIOUS
- ElasticMalicious: malicious (moderate confidence)
- MalwarebytesMalicious: RiskWare.Agent
- SentinelOneMalicious: Static AI - Suspicious PE
- TrendMicro-HouseCallMalicious: Trojan.Win64.Gen.TL0101HM26ZX
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaClean
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- ArcabitClean
- AvastClean
- Avast-MobileNo result
- AVGClean
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceClean
- CynetClean
- DrWebClean
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleClean
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusNo result
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MaxSecureClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoClean
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SangforClean
- SkyhighClean
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisClean
- TencentClean
- TrapmineClean
- TrellixENSClean
- TrendMicroClean
- TrustlookNo result
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootClean
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
Signatures and behavior heuristics
Low-severity pattern matches — worth noting but not on their own cause for alarm.
VirusTotal's sandbox summary maps this run to MITRE T1055 (Process Injection), but no injected process of the sample's own was recorded (the analysis VM's own WMI adapter, crash handlers and Chrome updater are not counted). VirusTotal maps T1055 on about half of all files no engine flags, so the mapping alone is not evidence of injection.
EvidenceT1055 (sandbox MITRE mapping)
Section entropy & packers
No high-entropy executable section or known packer signature was detected. Data and resource sections can still have high entropy without indicating packed code.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Chapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is RebirthPub_SaveEditor (1).exe safe, or is it malware?
What is RebirthPub_SaveEditor (1).exe?
How many antivirus engines detected RebirthPub_SaveEditor (1).exe?
I already downloaded and ran RebirthPub_SaveEditor (1).exe — what should I do?
What is the SHA-256 hash of RebirthPub_SaveEditor (1).exe?
How up to date is this analysis of RebirthPub_SaveEditor (1).exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.