MalwareTips
Threat LensFile scan report

Is pdfcoffee.com_a-guide-on-geometric-design-of-roads-atj-8-86-pindaan-2015compressedpdf-pdf-free.pdf safe?

Verdict
Safe

No antivirus engine detected a threat in this PDF, though its embedded JavaScript and limited submission history justify normal document-opening precautions.

None of 75 antivirus engines flagged the PDF, including all 17 reporting tier-1 engines, and curated threat-intelligence checks produced no hits. The document is newly observed and contains embedded JavaScript, while no runtime analysis is available, so open it only in an updated PDF reader with protection enabled.

Open with normal care

Open the document only with an updated PDF reader and keep security protection enabled. Prefer a trusted source if the document requests credentials or triggers unexpected external actions.

Read the full analysis
Saved file evidenceAntivirus consensus
0of 75 flagged
Flagged 0No detection 75
Digital specimenpdfcoffee.com_a-guide-on-geometric-design-of-roads-atj-8-86-pindaan-2015compressedpdf-pdf-free.pdfedfe13f17b79c734d3…04281bf6b42fa4
Size12.3 MB
Code signingNot applicable
SandboxPartial coverage
First seenToday
Evidence3 priority signals
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.

Recommended next actions

01

Before opening

Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.

02

If you already opened it

Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.

Chapter 02

Intelligence

The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.

MT AI Engine · Verdict analysis

The reasoning behind this verdict

This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.

83%Confidence
High
Analyst conclusion

None of 75 antivirus engines flagged the PDF, including all 17 reporting tier-1 engines, and curated threat-intelligence checks produced no hits. The document is newly observed and contains embedded JavaScript, while no runtime analysis is available, so open it only in an updated PDF reader with protection enabled.

Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
  • prevalence.classification=rare_new records only 1 submitter and 1 submission, so the hash lacks an established reputation.
  • file.tags includes js-embedded; embedded JavaScript can be legitimate or harmful, and behaviour=null provides no runtime evidence to resolve that ambiguity.
  • contactedHosts=null, so no complete host-reputation result is available.

These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.

Recommended action

Open the document only with an updated PDF reader and keep security protection enabled. Prefer a trusted source if the document requests credentials or triggers unexpected external actions.

Scan transparency

Coverage & freshness

3 of 5 complete

Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.

  • Antivirus

    Complete

    0 of 75 engines flagged the file.

  • Sandbox

    Partial

    Runtime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.

  • Network

    Not run

    No contacted-host reputation check is recorded.

    No timestamp recorded

  • YARA

    Complete

    Rule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.

  • External intel

    Complete

    3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.

Chapter 03

Behavior

Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.

Chapter 04

Detection & Forensics

Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.

Chapter 05

Safety & FAQ

Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.

What to do now

This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.

  1. Recovery step 01

    Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.

  2. Recovery step 02

    A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.

  3. Recovery step 03

    Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.

Safety FAQ

Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

6 evidence-based answers
Is this file safe?
Evidence-based answer
pdfcoffee.com_a-guide-on-geometric-design-of-roads-atj-8-86-pindaan-2015compressedpdf-pdf-free.pdf appears safe. 0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged it. Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.
What is this file?
Evidence-based answer
pdfcoffee.com_a-guide-on-geometric-design-of-roads-atj-8-86-pindaan-2015compressedpdf-pdf-free.pdf is a document file (application/pdf), about 12.3 MB. Our analysis did not identify a verdict-driving threat signal. A file's name can be reused by different files, so we identify it by its cryptographic hash (below).
How many antivirus engines detected this file?
Evidence-based answer
None — 0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged pdfcoffee.com_a-guide-on-geometric-design-of-roads-atj-8-86-pindaan-2015compressedpdf-pdf-free.pdf. That's reassuring, though it is not proof that a file is safe, so we also weigh its behaviour, identity, and reputation.
What is the SHA-256 hash of this file?
Evidence-based answer
The SHA-256 hash of pdfcoffee.com_a-guide-on-geometric-design-of-roads-atj-8-86-pindaan-2015compressedpdf-pdf-free.pdf is edfe13f17b79c734d3994c1be43abde1528e0502ae3f4d57ff04281bf6b42fa4, and its MD5 is 855a224d586eaa088e3a2bc366560499. This hash is the file's unique fingerprint — two files with the same SHA-256 are identical. Use it to confirm you're looking at exactly this file (not just one with the same name) when comparing against antivirus databases or a download's published checksum.
Is it safe to open this file?
Evidence-based answer
Based on the recorded evidence, pdfcoffee.com_a-guide-on-geometric-design-of-roads-atj-8-86-pindaan-2015compressedpdf-pdf-free.pdf has a low observed risk. The important caveat is source: make sure you downloaded it from the official website or a trusted store, because attackers sometimes distribute malware-laced copies under a legitimate file's name. If your own antivirus flags it, verify the source and the exact hash before overriding the warning.
How up to date is this analysis of this file?
Evidence-based answer
This report reflects the scan run on September 29, 2026. Because a file's hash never changes, the identity of pdfcoffee.com_a-guide-on-geometric-design-of-roads-atj-8-86-pindaan-2015compressedpdf-pdf-free.pdf is fixed — but antivirus coverage improves over time, so a file that looks clean today can pick up detections later (and vice-versa). If you need the latest picture, MalwareTips staff can re-run the analysis from scratch.
Chapter 06

Community

Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.

Scan another
Check a different file
URL instead?
Check if a link is safe
The raw file is processed temporarily and is not retained after processing. Its hash and report are public and permanent, so the next person who checks the same file gets an instant answer. Unknown files may be submitted to VirusTotal for analysis. If you ran this file on your computer and are worried, scan your system with an up-to-date antivirus and change critical passwords from a different device.