File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is Juanse Unlock. exe safe? Treat it as suspicious.
Six of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this unsigned executable, including three major antivirus engines, while generic labels and a clean sandbox run prevent…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why Suspicious? 6 antivirus engines flag it; nothing else confirms it.
Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.
If it came from a link, an attachment or a stranger, delete it.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't run it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already ran it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
6 of 71 flagged
- Flagged 6
- No detection 65
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 1mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
5 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
The labels lack family consensus, no injection target was identified, and the completed sandbox run returned clean, leaving materially mixed evidence.
Six of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the sample, with three major antivirus engines contributing independent concern. Ikarus and TrendMicro-HouseCall use generic Trojan or Krypt labels, while Fortinet reports only a possible threat, so there is no strong family consensus. The executable is unsigned and has no established publisher history to explain the detections as likely false positives. Evidence from the test run maps T1055, but it identifies no injected process or target, and the only completed sandbox run returned clean. Reputation checks for observed hosts were not completed, and the two dropped files have no saved verdicts, leaving important coverage gaps.
What We Detected
Six of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable. Fortinet, Ikarus, and TrendMicro-HouseCall are major antivirus engines, but their labels range from a possible threat to generic Win64 Trojan or Krypt terminology rather than converging on one established family. The file is also unsigned, so there is no verified publisher identity or historical signer record to provide reassurance.
Threat Behavior
The completed sandbox observation mapped T1055, which can indicate process injection. However, no injected target process was identified, so the mapping supports possible injection rather than proving it. The same run returned clean, created no persistence indicators, and the only recorded network address was identified as analysis-environment background traffic rather than sample activity. No complete contacted-host reputation result is available, and the two dropped files lack saved verdicts.
What To Do Now
Do not run the file on a production or personal system unless its origin and expected purpose can be independently verified. Keep security software enabled, let your antivirus remove the file, and obtain a fresh copy from the software publisher's official release channel if this program was expected.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The completed sandbox run returned clean and recorded no persistence indicators.
- Most engines did not flag the file, including Kaspersky, ESET, BitDefender, Avast, and Avira.
- No packer or high-entropy code was identified, and the major antivirus engines did not agree on a specific family.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- The completed sandbox run returned clean and recorded no persistence indicators.
- No packer or high-entropy code was found.
- Most antivirus products did not flag the file, and there is no strong family consensus.
- Six independent antivirus detections include three major antivirus engines.
- The Windows executable is unsigned and has no established publisher history.
- The test run mapped possible process injection behavior.
- The file was first observed on Sep 26, 2026, limiting long-term reputation evidence.
- Host reputation and dropped-file verdict coverage are incomplete.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 15sandbox rule tags
- 2spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 7filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Note: Listed the programs running on the test computer.
Note: Deleted files or logs during the test run (installers often clean up after themselves).
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Looked through folders on the test computer (most installers do this).
Note: Loaded extra code modules while running.
Note: Checked which security software was installed on the test computer.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as recording keystrokes; no keylogging was confirmed.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run
JuanseUnlock.exe
eef8afdfc11c9b939b44e8d0ced8afd4ab83b9c5807cb39a3aaf72f6ef643477
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
JuanseUnlock.exe
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\JuanseUnlock.exe"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
JuanseUnlock.exe
"C:\Users\user\Desktop\JuanseUnlock.exe"
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
juanseunlock.log
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Roaming\Juansekill\juanseunlock\juanseunlock.log
Test run - Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
Roaming
C:\Users\user\AppData\Roaming
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 15 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 2 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
6 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 6
- Fortinet (major engine)PossibleThreat.RF
- Ikarus (major engine)Trojan.Win64.Krypt
- TrendMicro-HouseCall (major engine)Trojan.Win64.Gen.TL0101J126Z8
- Elasticmalicious (moderate confidence)
- GoogleDetected
- McAfeeDti!EEF8AFDFC11C
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 16, 2026, 10:37 AM UTC
- SHA-256
eef8afdfc11c9b939b44e8d0ced8afd4ab83b9c5807cb39a3aaf72f6ef643477- SHA-1
b3e9280d2bb335589a6b1f7026f89943bb93e7f8- MD5
c2e366892dd5b03c3748c92fe836194c
About this file
JuanseUnlock.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 1.5 MB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 1.5 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Sep 26, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 23 distinct sources
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 6.51 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is JuanseUnlock.exe safe, or is it malware?
What is JuanseUnlock.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected JuanseUnlock.exe?
I already downloaded and ran JuanseUnlock.exe — what should I do?
What is the SHA-256 hash of JuanseUnlock.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of JuanseUnlock.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.