File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is jjsploit. exe safe? Treat it as suspicious.
The file is unsigned and has no major consensus, placing it in mixed-signal territory.
Why Suspicious? 2 antivirus engines flag it, but no major engine agrees; nothing else confirms it.
Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.
Treat as potentially unwanted game-hack software; avoid execution outside controlled environments and retain active antivirus protection.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't run it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already ran it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
2 of 71 flagged
- Flagged 2
- No detection 69
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 1mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
2 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
The sample triggers three offensive MITRE techniques and direct-IP contact, yet only two engines detect it and none are major. Absence of code signing and lack of historical RAG matches keep the file out of the safe category. Medium prevalence and no dropped malicious files it created prevent an malicious call. The combination of offensive runtime signals and low engine consensus yields a suspicious verdict.
What We Detected
Two engines (Malwarebytes smaller, Trapmine less reliable) label the file RiskWare.GameHack. The binary is unsigned and contacts one external IP directly.
Threat Behavior
Observed actions match common game-hack tooling patterns: injection into legitimate processes, tampering with security mechanisms, and credential-store probing. No major antivirus engines consensus or known-malicious files it created were found.
What To Do Now
Do not execute on production systems. Keep security software enabled. If the file is required for research, run it only in an isolated virtual machine with network monitoring.
Where this verdict could be wrong1 caveat
- No dropped file is known to be malicious and 10 children inspected with no malicious verdicts.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- No malicious detections from major antivirus engines
- No malicious files it created
- Medium prevalence with multiple submitters
- Unsigned executable
- Direct-IP contact without domain
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 partial. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 17sandbox rule tags
- 7spawned processes
- 1network contact
- 36filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Note: Read the user name of the test computer.
Note: Listed the programs running on the test computer.
Note: Talked to servers over the internet during the test run.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as recording keystrokes; no keylogging was confirmed.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as weakening security settings; no setting change was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as changing how Windows loads code; nothing confirms it.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 6: FileSeen in the test run
jjsploit.exe
f26df72e97bdfd28ed22e96b9592029aa8837429fddb053c2f77c83a27649d69
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 6: ProcessSeen in the test run
jjsploit.exe
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\jjsploit.exe"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 6: ProcessSeen in the test run
msedgewebview2.exe
"C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft\EdgeWebView\Application\122.0.2365.92\msedgewebview2.exe" --embedded-browser-webview=1 --webview-exe-name=jjsploit.exe --webview-exe-version=8.20.8 --user-data-dir="C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\net.wearedevs.jjsploit\EBWebView" --noerrdialogs --embedded-browser-webview-dpi-awareness=2 --edge-webview-custom-scheme --autoplay-policy=no-user-gesture-required --disable-features=msWebOOUI,msPdfOOUI,msSmartScreenProtection --enable-features=MojoIpcz --lang=en-US --accept-lang=en-US --mojo-named-platform-channel-pipe=2768.68.1424909882649286491
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 6: Written fileSeen in the test run
throttle_store.dat
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\net.wearedevs.jjsploit\EBWebView\Crashpad\throttle_store.dat
Test run - Evidence 5 of 6: Written fileSeen in the test run
settings.dat
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\net.wearedevs.jjsploit\EBWebView\Crashpad\settings.dat
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 1
Network
Hosts contacted
- Evidence 6 of 6: Contacted hostSeen in the test run
150.171.29.11
Contacted during the test run.
Test run
6 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes 17 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 5 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
2 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 partial. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 2
- MalwarebytesRiskWare.GameHack
- Trapminemalicious.high.ml.score
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Aug 31, 2026, 11:15 PM UTC
- SHA-256
f26df72e97bdfd28ed22e96b9592029aa8837429fddb053c2f77c83a27649d69- SHA-1
dea9edfdf551d46316fdf2ae2952da3ee911ba39- MD5
d7b3b26a514b4df2caed80c7cbe70970
About this file
jjsploit.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 18.2 MB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 18.2 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Aug 31, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 7 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 6.17 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is jjsploit.exe safe, or is it malware?
What is jjsploit.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected jjsploit.exe?
I already downloaded and ran jjsploit.exe — what should I do?
What is the SHA-256 hash of jjsploit.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of jjsploit.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.