File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is [13th Edition] Abcarian, Richard & Klotz, Marvin & Cohen, Samuel -
Zero detections across 76 engines on a 4-year-old ZIP archive with medium prevalence.
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Open or distribute without elevated concern; routine AV scanning on extraction is sufficient.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust the person or website you got it from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 63 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 63
- No result 13
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not run
- First seen 4y ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
0 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
All 63 antivirus engines that checked it returned clean results on this 5 MB ZIP file. No malicious indicators, no sandbox data, and medium historical submissions support a benign classification.
The complete absence of malicious detections from every engine tier, including 18 major antivirus engines, is the strongest signal. The file is a common ZIP archive with no code-signing concerns, no behavioural data, and no external-intel hits. Medium prevalence over 1427 days indicates legitimate distribution rather than a new threat. Filename analysis and triggered rules are also clean.
What We Detected
76 engines scanned the 5.2 MB ZIP archive; none flagged it malicious or suspicious. 18 major antivirus engines explicitly returned clean. No sandbox execution data, files it created, or contacted hosts were recorded.
Threat Behavior
No complete contacted-host reputation result was available, and no YARA or CIRCL matches. The file shows the typical profile of a widely shared document archive.
What To Do Now
The file can be treated as safe for normal use. If additional verification is required, re-scan after extracting contents or open in a sandboxed reader.
Where this verdict could be wrong1 caveat
- No sandbox behaviour data available; absence of malicious verdict cannot be confirmed by the test run.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Zero engine detections across all tiers
- Medium prevalence over 4 years
- No behavioural or network indicators
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 63 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Jul 23, 2026, 4:49 AM UTC
- SHA-256
f325269476233b01500b3ff2788665f7e483599fe08efa25ee1fa5cfa432a8f3- SHA-1
7b86b95bcd7cd35003e3f776aeb548e0f7ed824b- MD5
7abd089a9596c5415691dc145cbb0b10
About this file
[13th Edition] Abcarian, Richard & Klotz, Marvin & Cohen, Samuel - Literature The Human Experience (2018, Bedford_St. Martin’s) - libgen.li.epub is a ZIP file of 5.2 MB.
- Type and size
- ZIP · 5.2 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Aug 26, 2022On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 7 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Includes every engine result (76) and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is this file safe?
What is this file?
How many antivirus engines detected this file?
What is the SHA-256 hash of this file?
Is it safe to open or extract this file?
How up to date is this analysis of this file?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.