Threat LensFile scan report

Is REDEngineErrorReporter.exe safe?

Verdict
Safe

No engines detected malware, the CD PROJEKT signature verifies, and broad established prevalence outweighs unresolved direct-IP traffic seen during one sandbox run.

All 74 antivirus engines returned no malware or suspicious detection, including 17 tier-1 engines. The verified CD PROJEKT signature, established prevalence, five consistent signer-matched files, and lack of offensive sandbox techniques strongly support legitimate software, although the reputation of observed IP contacts was not checked.

Run with normal care

Allow it when obtained through an official CD PROJEKT product or update and the signature validates. If its origin is uncertain, verify the installation source and keep endpoint protection enabled.

Read the full analysis
Saved file evidenceAntivirus consensus
0of 74 flagged
Flagged 0No detection 74
Digital specimenREDEngineErrorReporter.exef3cba8150ca66fbdf1…de01c687bb686a
Size256.1 KB
Code signingCD PROJEKT S.A.
SandboxRuntime complete
First seen1y ago
Evidence3 priority signals
0 of 74 antivirus engines flagged the file.

Recommended next actions

01

Before running

Run it only when it came from the developer's official site or another source you independently trust.

02

If you already ran it

Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.

Chapter 02

Intelligence

The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.

MT AI Engine · Verdict analysis

The reasoning behind this verdict

This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.

96%Confidence
Very high
Analyst conclusion

All 74 antivirus engines returned no malware or suspicious detection, including 17 tier-1 engines. The verified CD PROJEKT signature, established prevalence, five consistent signer-matched files, and lack of offensive sandbox techniques strongly support legitimate software, although the reputation of observed IP contacts was not checked.

Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
  • MalwareTips.Synth.DirectIpC2 fired because seven external IP addresses were contacted without an application domain; contactedHosts=null leaves their reputation unresolved.
  • droppedChildren inspected one child, but its individual verdict is unknown even though droppedChildren.hasMaliciousChild=false.
  • signing.signerStats.totalSamples=1 is too small to establish broad historical trust by itself.

These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.

Recommended action

Allow it when obtained through an official CD PROJEKT product or update and the signature validates. If its origin is uncertain, verify the installation source and keep endpoint protection enabled.

Scan transparency

Coverage & freshness

4 of 5 complete

Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.

  • Antivirus

    Complete

    0 of 74 engines flagged the file.

  • Sandbox

    Complete

    1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.

  • Network

    Partial

    8 runtime contacts were observed without a completed reputation cross-check.

  • YARA

    Complete

    1 signature or behavior rule matched.

  • External intel

    Complete

    3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.

Chapter 03

Behavior

Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.

Runtime flight recorder

Capture complete
  • 1isolated sandbox run
  • 12MITRE ATT&CK techniques
  • 7spawned processes
  • 8network contacts
  • 3filesystem & mutex artifacts
Recorded behavior

Attack story

Runtime observations grouped by analysis stage. Arrows organize the stages; they do not claim chronology or causality.

ObservedDerived

7 recorded facts from one runtime window. Every fact remains independently traceable in Analyst mode.

Chapter 04

Detection & Forensics

Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.

Chapter 05

Safety & FAQ

Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.

What to do now

This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.

  1. Recovery step 01

    Run it only when it came from the developer's official site or another source you independently trust.

  2. Recovery step 02

    A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.

  3. Recovery step 03

    Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.

Safety FAQ

Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

7 evidence-based answers
Is REDEngineErrorReporter.exe safe?
Evidence-based answer
REDEngineErrorReporter.exe appears safe. 0 of 74 antivirus engines flagged it. It carries a verified digital signature from CD PROJEKT S.A.. Run it only when it came from the developer's official site or another source you independently trust.
What is REDEngineErrorReporter.exe?
Evidence-based answer
REDEngineErrorReporter.exe is a Windows executable program, about 256 KB. Our analysis did not identify a verdict-driving threat signal. It carries a verified digital signature from CD PROJEKT S.A.. A file's name can be reused by different files, so we identify it by its cryptographic hash (below).
How many antivirus engines detected REDEngineErrorReporter.exe?
Evidence-based answer
None — 0 of 74 antivirus engines flagged REDEngineErrorReporter.exe. That's reassuring, though it is not proof that a file is safe, so we also weigh its behaviour, identity, and reputation.
Is REDEngineErrorReporter.exe digitally signed?
Evidence-based answer
Yes — REDEngineErrorReporter.exe carries a valid digital signature from CD PROJEKT S.A., which confirms the file hasn't been tampered with since that publisher signed it. A valid signature is a positive signal, but note that malware is occasionally signed with stolen or abused certificates, so it isn't proof of safety on its own.
What is the SHA-256 hash of REDEngineErrorReporter.exe?
Evidence-based answer
The SHA-256 hash of REDEngineErrorReporter.exe is f3cba8150ca66fbdf1fb8c8621ba6db1257d2b644c65a58a2ade01c687bb686a, and its MD5 is cea16f3fbf162d35228a0f5d63c26e01. This hash is the file's unique fingerprint — two files with the same SHA-256 are identical. Use it to confirm you're looking at exactly this file (not just one with the same name) when comparing against antivirus databases or a download's published checksum.
Is it safe to run REDEngineErrorReporter.exe?
Evidence-based answer
Based on the recorded evidence, REDEngineErrorReporter.exe has a low observed risk and is properly signed. The important caveat is source: make sure you downloaded it from the official website or a trusted store, because attackers sometimes distribute malware-laced copies under a legitimate file's name. If your own antivirus flags it, verify the source and the exact hash before overriding the warning.
How up to date is this analysis of REDEngineErrorReporter.exe?
Evidence-based answer
This report reflects the scan run on September 23, 2026. Because a file's hash never changes, the identity of REDEngineErrorReporter.exe is fixed — but antivirus coverage improves over time, so a file that looks clean today can pick up detections later (and vice-versa). If you need the latest picture, MalwareTips staff can re-run the analysis from scratch.
Chapter 06

Community

Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.

The raw file is processed temporarily and is not retained after processing. Its hash and report are public and permanent, so the next person who checks the same file gets an instant answer. Unknown files may be submitted to VirusTotal for analysis. If you ran this file on your computer and are worried, scan your system with an up-to-date antivirus and change critical passwords from a different device.