File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is Wand Enhancer. exe safe? Treat it as suspicious.
No antivirus engine detected this unsigned executable, but its reputation and lack of evidence from the test run warrant caution until its source is verified.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why Suspicious? Unsigned Windows executable.
Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.
If it came from a link, an attachment or a stranger, delete it.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't run it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already ran it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 71 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 71
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Not run
- First seen 1mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
5 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
All 71 antivirus engines that checked it returned no detection, including 17 major antivirus engines, and static PE analysis found no obvious packing. However, the executable is unsigned, has been submitted only once, and has no completed sandbox observation, so its behavior and origin remain insufficiently established.
The strongest evidence is the complete absence of detections across 75 antivirus engines, including all 17 participating major antivirus engines. Static PE analysis also found neither a recognized packer nor high-entropy code. Counterbalancing that, the executable is unsigned and was first observed with only one submission, leaving no meaningful reputation history. No completed sandbox observation is available, so runtime actions cannot be characterized. The contacted-host reputation check is also unavailable, and broad file-type similarity to unrelated programs adds little confidence.
What We Detected
None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, including 17 major antivirus engines. The PE structure does not show a recognized packer, likely packing, or high-entropy code.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so process activity, persistence, network communication, and other behavior in the test run were not observed. A complete contacted-host reputation result is also unavailable.
What To Do Now
Confirm that the file came directly from the expected developer or an official distribution channel before running it. Keep security software enabled, and consider waiting for stronger reputation or testing it in an isolated analysis environment if the source cannot be verified.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The 0/71 detection result is favorable, but a first sighting today means signatures and reputation may not yet reflect the sample.
- No suspicious packing was identified, although static structure alone cannot establish what the executable does when it ran.
- Three similarHashes entries were previously marked 'safe', but they match only the broad Win32 executable file type and involve unrelated signed publishers.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/71 antivirus detections
- All 17 reporting major antivirus engines returned no detection
- No recognized packer
- No high-entropy code
- No external-intelligence matches
- Unsigned Windows executable
- First observed with only one submission
- No established publisher or signer history
- No completed observation from the test run
- No complete contacted-host reputation result
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Sep 11, 2026, 12:06 PM UTC
- SHA-256
f756751d309e65f91821abc7675000f15c4f519e558f6f3dace585f73c10825a- SHA-1
d9a88347b0e4cc5fba09eadc131e0355ce01a3fb- MD5
2c0ed5c6d235f4fd7fa4eb5d255e1e57
About this file
WandEnhancer.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 2.0 MB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 2.0 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Sep 11, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 1 sourceRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 6.06 of 8
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
0 of 71 engines flagged this file
4 of the 75 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-118 engines0flagged
- Tier-236 engines0flagged
- Low-trust17 engines0flagged
View all 75 engine results
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaClean
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXClean
- ArcabitClean
- AvastClean
- Avast-MobileNo result
- AVGClean
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- BkavClean
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceClean
- CynetClean
- DeepInstinctClean
- DrWebClean
- ElasticClean
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleClean
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusClean
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoClean
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneClean
- SkyhighClean
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisClean
- TencentClean
- TrapmineClean
- TrellixENSClean
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- TrustlookNo result
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootClean
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
Section entropy & packers
No high-entropy executable section or known packer signature was detected. Data and resource sections can still have high entropy without indicating packed code.
How widely this file has been seen
Rarely uploaded, and first seen more than two weeks ago. Often niche legitimate software or internal tooling; not a strong malware signal on its own.
Chapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is WandEnhancer.exe safe, or is it malware?
What is WandEnhancer.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected WandEnhancer.exe?
What should I do if I already ran WandEnhancer.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of WandEnhancer.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of WandEnhancer.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.