File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is Fast Flag Manager_ Installer. exe safe? Treat it as suspicious.
Unsigned Roblox flag-manager installer protected with .NET Reactor; no engine detections and clean sandbox runs, but uncorroborated community stealer claims leave its intent…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why Suspicious? One of our detection rules matched it; nothing else confirms it.
Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.
If it came from a link, an attachment or a stranger, delete it.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't install it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already installed it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 71 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 71
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 5mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this installer, and the sandbox runs returned clean with no observed injection. It is unsigned and its main code is wrapped in a commercial protector, it contacts a lesser-known domain, and some community annotations allege cookie theft. Those claims could not be confirmed, so the available evidence does not support a firm conclusion either way.
The file installs a Roblox FFlag manager through Inno Setup, and none of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it, including all 18 major antivirus engines. The sandbox runs returned clean, recorded no injected processes and no high-risk techniques, and the contacted hosts have no malicious reputation in our records. Against that, the program is unsigned and protected with .NET Reactor, which hides its code from inspection. It also contacts a little-known domain alongside GitHub's API. Two community annotations describe it as a cookie stealer or trojan, but no rule match, sample-database listing or detection backs that up. With a clean scan on one side and an opaque, unsigned build plus unverified accusations on the other, a confident call is not possible.
What We Detected
None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this installer, and all 18 major antivirus engines reported it clean. It is unsigned and protected with .NET Reactor, a commercial code protector. No sample-database listing or malware-specific rule matched.
Threat Behavior
Across four sandbox runs, the installer unpacked an Inno Setup payload into a Roblox FFlag Manager folder and launched it. No named process injection or persistence was recorded, and the combined sandbox verdict was clean. The program contacted a lesser-known domain and GitHub's API, neither of which is known as malicious in our records. Some community annotations allege cookie-stealing behaviour, but none of the evidence we hold corroborates that.
What To Do Now
Only run this tool if you obtained it from the developer's official page and trust the source. Game-modding tools that touch account data deserve caution. Keep your antivirus enabled, and if you already ran it and notice unexpected logins, change your Roblox and browser-stored passwords.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it, the combined sandbox verdict was clean, and about 2,000 distinct submitters over five months with no detections argues against an active stealer.
- Community claims of a cookie stealer are unverified opinions, but commercial protectors can hide stealer code from engines, so a clean scan does not fully rule it out.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file.
- The combined sandbox verdict was clean with no process injection recorded.
- Contacted hosts have no malicious or suspicious reputation in our records.
- Seen from more than 2,000 distinct sources over about five months without detections.
- The installer is unsigned, so its author cannot be verified.
- Its code is wrapped in a commercial protector that hides it from inspection.
- It contacts a lesser-known domain in addition to GitHub.
- Community annotations allege cookie-stealing behaviour, though these are unverified.
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in 4 isolated tests; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 4isolated sandbox runs
- 20sandbox rule tags
- 6spawned processes
- 4network contacts
- 35filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Note: Read the user name of the test computer.
Note: Listed the programs running on the test computer.
Note: Deleted files or logs during the test run (installers often clean up after themselves).
Note: Talked to servers over the internet during the test run.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as setting up auto-start; no auto-start entry was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as weakening security settings; no setting change was recorded.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 7: FileSeen in the test run
FastFlagManager_Installer.exe
f8364e020bfd2ce12cf2bdc95782d8d2875b708f0321e5904725d02c59983a24
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 7: ProcessSeen in the test run
FFM_Installer.exe
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\FFM_Installer.exe"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 7: ProcessSeen in the test run
FFM_Installer.tmp
"C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\is-F0WD9IJT5F.tmp\FFM_Installer.tmp" /SL5="$5002C,16844716,844288,C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\FFM_Installer.exe"
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 7: Written fileSeen in the test run
FFM_Installer.tmp
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\is-F0WD9IJT5F.tmp\FFM_Installer.tmp
Test run - Evidence 5 of 7: Written fileSeen in the test run
_setup64.tmp
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\is-9R9NI6VKI1.tmp\_isetup\_setup64.tmp
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Network
Hosts contacted
- Evidence 6 of 7: Contacted hostSeen in the test run
imtheo.lol
Contacted during the test run.
Test run - Evidence 7 of 7: Contacted hostSeen in the test run
api.github.com
Contacted during the test run.
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
7 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 20 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 10 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 21, 2026, 7:29 PM UTC
- SHA-256
f8364e020bfd2ce12cf2bdc95782d8d2875b708f0321e5904725d02c59983a24- SHA-1
dd94257dd396fda83f367d8422c241ec0469a561- MD5
6970b1c189d7890631fd756969720d52
About this file
FastFlagManager_Installer.exe says it is Roblox FFlag Manager Setup (Roblox FFlag Manager), 18.0 MB.
- Claims to be
- Roblox FFlag Manager Setup (Roblox FFlag Manager)From the file's own version information, written by whoever built it.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 18.0 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- May 16, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 2,084 distinct sources
- Packer
- .NET Reactor 2.X-3.X (DetectItEasy protector)Packing hides code; legitimate installers use it too.
- Entropy
- 6.35 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 2 matched signature rules, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is FastFlagManager_Installer.exe safe, or is it malware?
What is FastFlagManager_Installer.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected FastFlagManager_Installer.exe?
What should I do if I already installed FastFlagManager_Installer.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of FastFlagManager_Installer.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of FastFlagManager_Installer.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.