File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is Texture.
No engines flagged this Windows installer, and four sandbox runs produced a combined clean result without corroborated process injection or other hostile activity.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Install it only if it came from the developer's own website or an official app store.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
0 of 60 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 60
- No result 15
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 24d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 60 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this Windows installer, including the major engines represented in the results. Four sandbox runs produced a combined clean verdict, and the mapping had no named injection target; however, the package is unsigned and has a modest submission history.
None of the 60 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the installer, while 60 engines analysed it and 18 major engines reported no detection. Four sandbox runs produced a combined clean verdict, with no malicious sandbox result, named injection target, persistence indicator, or sample-generated network contact recorded. The mapping was not accompanied by the artefact needed to establish process injection and therefore carries no adverse weight. External checks returned no MalwareBazaar listing or malware-specific community rules, and no malicious file it created was identified. The unsigned package and its six recorded submissions reduce confidence in publisher identity, but they do not outweigh the consistent antivirus and evidence from the test run.
What We Detected
None of the 60 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this Windows installer. Sixty engines analysed it, including 18 major engines that reported no detection. External checks found no MalwareBazaar listing or malware-specific community rules.
Threat Behavior
Four sandbox runs produced a combined clean verdict. The installer ran through the normal Windows Installer process, with no malicious sandbox result, persistence indicator, named injection target, or sample-generated network contact recorded. A T1055 mapping appeared without an injection target, so it does not establish that process injection occurred.
What To Do Now
The available evidence supports normal use if the installer came from the expected source. Because it is unsigned and its publisher cannot be authenticated, keep security software enabled and obtain it through the product's official distribution channel.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The installer is unsigned, so its publisher cannot be authenticated.
- It has only six recorded submissions, providing limited distribution history.
- The bytes were not available for our static analysis, although the antivirus and evidence from the test run found no hostile indicators.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 60 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the installer.
- Four sandbox runs produced a combined clean verdict without a malicious result.
- No named process-injection target, persistence indicator, or sample-generated network contact was recorded.
- No MalwareBazaar listing or malware-specific community rule matched the hash.
- No malicious file it created was identified.
- The Windows installer is unsigned, so its publisher identity cannot be authenticated.
- Only six submissions are recorded, giving it a modest distribution history.
- The file bytes were unavailable for our static analysis.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in 4 isolated tests; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 4isolated sandbox runs
- 6sandbox rule tags
- 2spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 9filesystem & mutex artifacts
What this file did when executed
This file was detonated in 4 sandboxes and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Sandbox verdicts
1- VT: CLEANclean
Techniques observed in the sandbox
6MITRE ATT&CK techniques the sandbox mapped. Highlighted ones are rare in normal software; the others are common in legitimate programs too.
- T1033· Reads user info
- T1055· Process injection
- T1082· System recon
- T1091· USB spreading
- T1120
- T1574· Execution hijack
Observed activity
Processes started
2Programs the file ran, with their command lines.
msiexec.exe"C:\Windows\system32\msiexec.exe" /I "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\Texture.Manager.2_0.4.1_x64_en-US.msi" /qb ACCEPTEULA=1 LicenseAccepted=1msiexec.exe"C:\Windows\System32\msiexec.exe" /i "C:\Users\user\Desktop\Texture.Manager.2_0.4.1_x64_en-US.msi"
Files
7Files the file created, changed or deleted.
- Written
C:\MSI41ec8.tmp - Written
C:\ProgramData - Written
C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Templates - Written
C:\Windows\Fonts - Written
C:\Windows\system32\catroot - Written
C:\Windows\system32\catroot2
Show all 7 entries for files
- Deleted
C:\MSI41ec8.tmp
Mutexes
2Named locks a program uses so only one copy runs; malware families often reuse them.
Global\_MSIExecute\BaseNamedObjects\Local\SM0:6972:304:WilStaging_02
Sandbox background — not the file
6The analysis machine's own processes and connections, recorded in every run.
- VM process
services.exeC:\Windows\system32\services.exe - VM process
svchost.exeC:\Windows\System32\svchost.exe -k NetworkService -p - VM process
svchost.exeC:\Windows\system32\svchost.exe -k UnistackSvcGroup - VM process
svchost.exeC:\Windows\system32\svchost.exe -k LocalService -s W32Time - VM process
lsass.exeC:\Windows\system32\lsass.exe - VM process
msiexec.exeC:\Windows\System32\msiexec.exe C:\Windows\system32\msiexec.exe /V
Chapter 04
Technical details
None of the 60 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Nov 3, 2026, 11:03 PM UTC
- SHA-256
f88751efa78c37533802c2d6ccfea40caacf352ef1ea1bc5d0a2e8431eaf7797- SHA-1
b60ce0fffd4869c42241b69971efed364ddfe8ab- MD5
2569ba3846bf19eeab3045ef3f679336
About this file
Texture.Manager.2_0.4.1_x64_en-US.msi is a Windows Installer file of 38.6 MB.
- Type and size
- Windows Installer · 38.6 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Oct 10, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 6 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
0 of 60 engines flagged this file
15 of the 75 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-118 engines0flagged
- Tier-231 engines0flagged
- Low-trust11 engines0flagged
View all 75 engine results
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaNo result
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXNo result
- ArcabitClean
- AvastClean
- Avast-MobileNo result
- AVGClean
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- BkavClean
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceNo result
- CynetClean
- DeepInstinctNo result
- DrWebClean
- ElasticNo result
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleNo result
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusClean
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoNo result
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneNo result
- SkyhighClean
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisNo result
- TencentClean
- TrapmineNo result
- TrellixENSClean
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- TrustlookNo result
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootNo result
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
Signatures and behavior heuristics
Low-severity pattern matches — worth noting but not on their own cause for alarm.
VirusTotal's sandbox summary maps this run to MITRE T1055 (Process Injection), but no injected process of the sample's own was recorded (the analysis VM's own WMI adapter, crash handlers and Chrome updater are not counted). VirusTotal maps T1055 on about half of all files no engine flags, so the mapping alone is not evidence of injection.
EvidenceT1055 (sandbox MITRE mapping)
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Chapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is Texture.Manager.2_0.4.1_x64_en-US.msi safe?
What is Texture.Manager.2_0.4.1_x64_en-US.msi?
How many antivirus engines detected Texture.Manager.2_0.4.1_x64_en-US.msi?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Texture.Manager.2_0.4.1_x64_en-US.msi?
Is it safe to install Texture.Manager.2_0.4.1_x64_en-US.msi?
How up to date is this analysis of Texture.Manager.2_0.4.1_x64_en-US.msi?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.