File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is Vetting Agent_ 04ce77ce63fd8806e0c0df9fcd48b3b5. exe safe? Treat it as suspicious.
The antivirus detections are weak: 3 of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, with no major detections or family consensus.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why Suspicious? 3 antivirus engines flag it, but no major engine agrees; nothing else confirms it.
Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.
If it came from a link, an attachment or a stranger, delete it.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't run it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already ran it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
3 of 65 flagged
- Flagged 3
- No detection 62
- No result 10
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 4mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
6 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
Three of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it raised generic detections, but none came from major antivirus engines and no malware family was identified. That detection pattern alone would not establish a malware finding. The stronger concern is evidence from the test run mapped to T1055, T1485, T1486, and T1562.001, plus activity targeting the Windows password store. The executable is unsigned and has no established publisher history to explain those capabilities. Counter-signals include 14 major antivirus engines reporting no detection, no explicit malicious sandbox verdict, and no identified malicious child, leaving the evidence mixed rather than conclusive.
What We Detected
Three of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable. APEX and Bkav are less reliable detections, while DeepInstinct is smaller; no major antivirus engines detected it and no family consensus exists. The executable is unsigned and has no publisher history.
Threat Behavior
No sandbox supplied an explicit malicious verdict, and none of 10 inspected dropped files was identified as malicious, although all 10 children remained unclassified. Host-reputation checking covered only 5 hosts despite eight contacted IPs and additional URL hosts, so no complete network-reputation result is available.
What To Do Now
Do not run this file on a production or personal Windows system unless its origin and purpose can be independently verified. Keep security software enabled, obtain the executable from a trusted publisher channel, and isolate any system where it has already run while reviewing credential-access and defense-tampering alerts.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- No sandbox returned a malicious verdict, and no dropped file is known to be malicious across 10 inspected children, although every child remained unclassified.
- No community YARA rule matched, the hash is not in the known-software reference database, and the hash is not listed in the MalwareBazaar malware database; these absences may reflect intelligence coverage limits.
- contactedHosts found no cached malicious or suspicious entries among 5 inspected hosts, but this did not cover every observed network contact.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- No major antivirus engines detections among 75 total engines
- No explicit malicious sandbox verdict
- No identified malicious child among 10 inspected
- No CIRCL, MalwareBazaar, or YARAify hit
- Runtime mapping to process injection
- Runtime mappings include and T1486
- Defense-evasion mapping T1562.001
- Unsigned Win32 executable with no signer history
- Incomplete reputation coverage for observed network contacts
- Three generic antivirus detections
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 partial. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 31sandbox rule tags
- 8spawned processes
- 12network contacts
- 16filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Moderate concern: Used an unusual way to talk to a server.
Moderate concern: Downloaded a file during the test run.
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Moderate concern: Hid files or windows on the test computer.
Note: Read the user name of the test computer.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: Showed activity a sandbox rule links to file encryption; no ransomware behaviour was confirmed.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as weakening security settings; no setting change was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as changing how Windows loads code; nothing confirms it.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 7: FileSeen in the test run
VettingAgent_04ce77ce63fd8806e0c0df9fcd48b3b5.exe
fb7cf9dcc1b9b45e81abab48b47abe8e89bd5fb8696f614192368df1d5491a57
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 7: ProcessSeen in the test run
powershell
powershell -NoProfile -NonInteractive -Command "Get-PnpDevice -Class Camera -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | Where-Object {$_.Status -eq 'OK'} | Select-Object -ExpandProperty FriendlyName"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 7: ProcessSeen in the test run
VettingAgent_2b47f5f846c94f2bdda7baaa4c3d1606.exe
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\VettingAgent_2b47f5f846c94f2bdda7baaa4c3d1606.exe"
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 7: Written fileSeen in the test run
StartupProfileData-NonInteractive
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\PowerShell\StartupProfileData-NonInteractive
Test run - Evidence 5 of 7: Written fileSeen in the test run
mfc140u.dll
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI59202\Pythonwin\mfc140u.dll
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Network
Hosts contacted
- Evidence 6 of 7: Contacted hostSeen in the test run
172.67.193.73
Contacted during the test run.
Test run - Evidence 7 of 7: Contacted hostSeen in the test run
104.17.147.22
Contacted during the test run.
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
7 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes 31 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 9 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
3 of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 partial. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 3
- APEXMalicious
- BkavW32.Malware.CFCC61D1
- DeepInstinctMALICIOUS
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Sep 8, 2026, 3:58 PM UTC
- SHA-256
fb7cf9dcc1b9b45e81abab48b47abe8e89bd5fb8696f614192368df1d5491a57- SHA-1
b48aa3b058a6ce8395bedcc5d85309d7145a0763- MD5
bef89bee272a069107894177af2edf69
About this file
VettingAgent_04ce77ce63fd8806e0c0df9fcd48b3b5.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 13.2 MB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 13.2 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Jun 22, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 20 distinct sources
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 8.00 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is VettingAgent_04ce77ce63fd8806e0c0df9fcd48b3b5.exe safe, or is it malware?
What is VettingAgent_04ce77ce63fd8806e0c0df9fcd48b3b5.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected VettingAgent_04ce77ce63fd8806e0c0df9fcd48b3b5.exe?
What should I do if I already ran VettingAgent_04ce77ce63fd8806e0c0df9fcd48b3b5.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of VettingAgent_04ce77ce63fd8806e0c0df9fcd48b3b5.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of VettingAgent_04ce77ce63fd8806e0c0df9fcd48b3b5.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.