Is 42.225.202.233 safe?
http://42.225.202.233:45104/bin.sh
Coveragestrong3 of 4 applicable core capabilities
Dangerous: this script URL is widely detected as malicious
The target points to a shell-script path and received 10 malicious and 3 suspicious detections across 92 engines, with adverse findings from eight independent antivirus families. Although the server currently refuses connections and one browser-protection check showed no warning, the strong multi-engine detections make this target dangerous.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
The target points to a shell-script path and received 10 malicious and 3 suspicious detections across 92 engines, with adverse findings from eight independent antivirus families. Although the server currently refuses connections and one browser-protection check showed no warning, the strong multi-engine detections make this target dangerous.
Strong malware detections
The saved scan recorded 10 malicious and 3 suspicious results among 92 engines. Eight independent antivirus families also returned adverse findings, providing substantial evidence of a technical threat rather than an isolated alert.
Currently unreachable, but not cleared
The server refused the saved connection attempt, so its content and any operator, contact, or policy information could not be reviewed. The TLS check also did not validate the connection.
A browser-protection check returned no warning, but that limited result does not outweigh the numerous malicious and suspicious detections.
Technical risk outweighs limited reputation context
The hosting IP had a low abuse-confidence score based on only one saved report, but the target-specific multi-engine detections are materially stronger evidence of danger.
Why the score is 12
8 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
13/ 92
detectionsFresh result
13 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 10
- Suspicious
- 3
- Total
- 92
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| BitDefenderMalicious | malware |
| CRDFMalicious | malicious |
| EmsisoftMalicious | malware |
| ESETMalicious | malware |
| FortinetMalicious | malware |
| G-DataMalicious | malware |
| GreyNoiseMalicious | malicious |
| SophosMalicious | malware |
| VIPREMalicious | malware |
| WebrootMalicious | malicious |
| alphaMountain.aiSuspicious | suspicious |
| GridinsoftSuspicious | suspicious |
| SOCRadarSuspicious | suspicious |
All 92 engine results
- BitDefender - malware - Malicious
- CRDF - malicious - Malicious
- Emsisoft - malware - Malicious
- ESET - malware - Malicious
- Fortinet - malware - Malicious
- G-Data - malware - Malicious
- GreyNoise - malicious - Malicious
- Sophos - malware - Malicious
- VIPRE - malware - Malicious
- Webroot - malicious - Malicious
- alphaMountain.ai - suspicious - Suspicious
- Gridinsoft - suspicious - Suspicious
- SOCRadar - suspicious - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - unrated - Clean
- Abusix - clean - Clean
- Acronis - clean - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - clean - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - clean - Clean
- AlienVault - clean - Clean
- AlphaSOC - unrated - Clean
- Antiy-AVL - clean - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- AutoShun - unrated - Clean
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - unrated - Clean
- Bkav - unrated - Clean
- BlockList - clean - Clean
- Blueliv - clean - Clean
- Certego - clean - Clean
- ChainPatrol - unrated - Clean
- Chong Lua Dao - clean - Clean
- CINS Army - clean - Clean
- Criminal IP - unrated - Clean
- CSIS Security Group - unrated - Clean
- CTX AI - clean - Clean
- Cyan - unrated - Clean
- Cyble - clean - Clean
- CyRadar - clean - Clean
- desenmascara.me - clean - Clean
- DNS8 - unrated - Clean
- Dr.Web - clean - Clean
- EmergingThreats - clean - Clean
- Ermes - unrated - Clean
- ESTsecurity - clean - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - unrated - Clean
- Fortra - unrated - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- Google Safe Browsing - clean - Clean
- GreenSnow - clean - Clean
- Guardpot - unrated - Clean
- Heimdal Security - clean - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- IPsum - clean - Clean
- Juniper Networks - clean - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - unrated - Clean
- Kaspersky - unrated - Clean
- LevelBlue - clean - Clean
- Lionic - clean - Clean
- Lumu - unrated - Clean
- Malwared - clean - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - clean - Clean
- MalwareURL - unrated - Clean
- Mimecast - unrated - Clean
- Netcraft - unrated - Clean
- OpenPhish - clean - Clean
- PhishFort - unrated - Clean
- Phishing Database - clean - Clean
- Phishtank - clean - Clean
- PREBYTES - clean - Clean
- PrecisionSec - unrated - Clean
- Quick Heal - clean - Clean
- Quttera - clean - Clean
- Rising - clean - Clean
- SafeToOpen - unrated - Clean
- Sangfor - clean - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - unrated - Clean
- Scantitan - clean - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - clean - Clean
- Seclookup - clean - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - unrated - Clean
- StopForumSpam - clean - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - clean - Clean
- Synthient - unrated - Clean
- ThreatHive - clean - Clean
- URLhaus - clean - Clean
- URLQuery - unrated - Clean
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - clean - Clean
- ViriBack - clean - Clean
- VX Vault - clean - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - clean - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - clean - Clean
- ZeroCERT - clean - Clean
- ZeroFox - unrated - Clean
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Independent evidence classifies the site as downloader, but the page's own claim could not be captured.
What we observed
Saved browser evidence recorded file downloads.
What independent research found
The search completed without a material external warning or corroborating report.
What remains unverified
1 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
Malware & Deceptive Downloads
Service and business model
Downloader
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01The target received 10 malicious and 3 suspicious detections across 92 engines.
- 028 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result.
- 03The server refused the connection, preventing review of its content and operator information.
Web research findings
Independent findings for 42.225.202.233, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for 42.225.202.233. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domain42.225.202.233
- Redirects to42.225.202.233
- Hosted byChina Unicom Henan province network
Domain & Encryption
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruscomplete
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentunavailable
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidenceunavailable
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
maliciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
Additional evidence review · Additional evidence review
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 13 of 92 engines flagged | Completed | Adverse | fresh · Oct 5, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | The saved page capture was not reliable enough to use | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Independent research | The search completed without a material external finding | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
- Antivirus
- Result13 of 92 engines flagged
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessfresh · Oct 5, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionUnavailable
- FindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- ResultThe saved page capture was not reliable enough to use
- CompletionUnavailable
- FindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Independent research
- ResultThe search completed without a material external finding
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- FreshnessNot available
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is 42.225.202.233 a scam or a legit download site?
Is 42.225.202.233 safe to use?
I already paid or entered my details on 42.225.202.233 — what should I do?
Can I get my money back from 42.225.202.233?
Is my device infected after visiting 42.225.202.233?
How do I report 42.225.202.233?
42.225.202.233 looks professional — how can it still be a scam?
Has 42.225.202.233 been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is 42.225.202.233 on any phishing or malware blacklists?
Where is 42.225.202.233 hosted?
How often is the 42.225.202.233 report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Dangerous: this script URL is widely detected as malicious
The written conclusion remains part of the saved report.
The target points to a shell-script path and received 10 malicious and 3 suspicious detections across 92 engines, with adverse findings from eight independent antivirus families. Although the server currently refuses connections and one browser-protection check showed no warning, the strong multi-engine detections make this target dangerous.
09 · Community