Is 54.37.156.213 safe?
http://54.37.156.213/?keyname=fHeVvX6
Coveragestrong2 of 4 applicable core capabilities
Phishing-test page on security-flagged infrastructure
The page visibly identifies itself as “TESTE DE PHISHING,” but the IP has multiple malicious and suspicious detections. No supplied evidence shows a credential form, malware download, or commercial transaction, so it cannot be confirmed as an active phishing attack; nevertheless, the detection record and failed TLS validation make it unsuitable for routine use.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
The page visibly identifies itself as “TESTE DE PHISHING,” but the IP has multiple malicious and suspicious detections. No supplied evidence shows a credential form, malware download, or commercial transaction, so it cannot be confirmed as an active phishing attack; nevertheless, the detection record and failed TLS validation make it unsuitable for routine use.
What the page shows
The captured page displays “TESTE DE PHISHING,” “Visualforma,” and the IP address 54.37.156.213. This supports a phishing-test context, but the available evidence does not document a login form or credential submission flow.
Technical reputation warrants caution
Four independent antivirus families returned adverse results, while a broader scan recorded five malicious and two suspicious detections among 90 engines. These are meaningful warning signals even though they do not, by themselves, establish what the page does to visitors.
The saved TLS check also failed to validate the connection. Combined with the adverse reputation, this supports a Moderate Risk rating rather than treating the apparent test page as safe.
Why the score is 48
4 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
7/ 90
detectionsFresh result
7 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 5
- Suspicious
- 2
- Total
- 90
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| alphaMountain.aiMalicious | malicious |
| BitDefenderMalicious | malware |
| FortinetMalicious | phishing |
| G-DataMalicious | malware |
| SophosMalicious | malware |
| GridinsoftSuspicious | suspicious |
| SOCRadarSuspicious | suspicious |
All 90 engine results
- alphaMountain.ai - malicious - Malicious
- BitDefender - malware - Malicious
- Fortinet - phishing - Malicious
- G-Data - malware - Malicious
- Sophos - malware - Malicious
- Gridinsoft - suspicious - Suspicious
- SOCRadar - suspicious - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - unrated - Clean
- Abusix - clean - Clean
- Acronis - clean - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - clean - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - clean - Clean
- AlienVault - clean - Clean
- AlphaSOC - unrated - Clean
- Antiy-AVL - clean - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- AutoShun - unrated - Clean
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - unrated - Clean
- Bkav - unrated - Clean
- BlockList - clean - Clean
- Blueliv - clean - Clean
- Certego - clean - Clean
- ChainPatrol - unrated - Clean
- Chong Lua Dao - clean - Clean
- CINS Army - clean - Clean
- CRDF - clean - Clean
- Criminal IP - unrated - Clean
- CSIS Security Group - unrated - Clean
- CTX AI - clean - Clean
- Cyan - unrated - Clean
- Cyble - clean - Clean
- CyRadar - clean - Clean
- desenmascara.me - clean - Clean
- DNS8 - unrated - Clean
- Dr.Web - clean - Clean
- EmergingThreats - clean - Clean
- Emsisoft - clean - Clean
- Ermes - unrated - Clean
- ESET - clean - Clean
- ESTsecurity - clean - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - clean - Clean
- Fortra - unrated - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- Google Safe Browsing - clean - Clean
- GreenSnow - clean - Clean
- GreyNoise - unrated - Clean
- Guardpot - unrated - Clean
- Heimdal Security - clean - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- IPsum - clean - Clean
- Juniper Networks - clean - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - unrated - Clean
- Kaspersky - unrated - Clean
- LevelBlue - unrated - Clean
- Lionic - clean - Clean
- Lumu - unrated - Clean
- Malwared - clean - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - clean - Clean
- MalwareURL - unrated - Clean
- Mimecast - unrated - Clean
- Netcraft - unrated - Clean
- OpenPhish - clean - Clean
- PhishFort - unrated - Clean
- Phishtank - clean - Clean
- PREBYTES - clean - Clean
- PrecisionSec - unrated - Clean
- Quick Heal - clean - Clean
- Quttera - clean - Clean
- Rising - clean - Clean
- SafeToOpen - unrated - Clean
- Sangfor - clean - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - unrated - Clean
- Scantitan - clean - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - clean - Clean
- Seclookup - clean - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - unrated - Clean
- StopForumSpam - clean - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - clean - Clean
- ThreatHive - clean - Clean
- URLhaus - clean - Clean
- URLQuery - unrated - Clean
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - clean - Clean
- VIPRE - unrated - Clean
- ViriBack - clean - Clean
- VX Vault - clean - Clean
- Webroot - clean - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - clean - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - clean - Clean
- ZeroCERT - clean - Clean
- ZeroFox - unrated - Clean
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
TESTE DE PHISHING
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
TESTE DE PHISHING
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Teste de Phishing
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 90 antivirus results.
What independent research found
The search completed without a material external warning or corroborating report.
What remains unverified
2 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Content
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 014 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result.
- 02The IP received several malicious or suspicious security detections.
- 03The visible page labels itself “TESTE DE PHISHING.”
Web research findings
Independent findings for 54.37.156.213, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for 54.37.156.213. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domain54.37.156.213
- Redirects to54.37.156.213
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
- No direct contact email found on the captured page.
Domain & Encryption
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruscomplete
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentpartial
- Analysispartial
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
maliciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
Additional evidence review · Additional evidence review
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 7 of 90 engines flagged | Completed | Adverse | fresh · Sep 18, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Limited | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Independent research | The search completed without a material external finding | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
- Antivirus
- Result7 of 90 engines flagged
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessfresh · Sep 18, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionLimited
- FindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Independent research
- ResultThe search completed without a material external finding
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- FreshnessNot available
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is 54.37.156.213 a scam or is it safe?
Is 54.37.156.213 safe to use?
Has 54.37.156.213 been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is 54.37.156.213 on any phishing or malware blacklists?
Does 54.37.156.213 have a valid SSL certificate?
How often is the 54.37.156.213 report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Phishing-test page on security-flagged infrastructure
The page visibly identifies itself as “TESTE DE PHISHING,” but the IP has multiple malicious and suspicious detections. No supplied evidence shows a credential form, malware download, or commercial transaction, so it cannot be confirmed as an active phishing attack; nevertheless, the detection record and failed TLS validation make it unsuitable for routine use.
09 · Community