Is anba.by safe?
http://anba.by/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: partial · 2 of 4 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (58 of 92 engines answered) · saved result: did not fully complete
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading · limited: did not fully complete
- page capture: completed
- domain records · not available: did not fully complete
- web research: completed
Portfolio site anba.by carries a stale antivirus flag tied to a phishing subdomain, and its own pages could not be reviewed
anba.by presents itself as the personal portfolio of a web developer, Anton Bondarenko, who advertises building and growing online stores. The visible page text is consistent with that claim, and the saved TLS check shows a valid encrypted connection while the browser threat feed returned no warning. However, one independent antivirus family reported an adverse result, and the site's own page, contact, About and policy text could not be read because the request timed out. That combination — a real but stale detection plus unreadable site pages — means the site cannot be treated as clearly safe, even though nothing in the reviewed evidence shows an active scam aimed at visitors.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 62/100
Moderate Risk covers scores 45–69. 1 finding pulled the score down; 2 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- Strong1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.-3 pts
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection.
- SupportsThe browser threat feed returned no threat warning for the site.
Points come from the saved evidence ledger: it lowered the score from 65 to 62 and split those 3 points between the findings that show points; the others carry no points in the ledger. Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
anba.by presents itself as the personal portfolio of a web developer, Anton Bondarenko, who advertises building and growing online stores. The visible page text is consistent with that claim, and the saved TLS check shows a valid encrypted connection while the browser threat feed returned no warning. However, one independent antivirus family reported an adverse result, and the site's own page, contact, About and policy text could not be read because the request timed out. That combination — a real but stale detection plus unreadable site pages — means the site cannot be treated as clearly safe, even though nothing in the reviewed evidence shows an active scam aimed at visitors.
Mixed technical signals: clean browsing check, but an adverse antivirus result
The saved checks are not unanimous. The browser threat feed returned no threat warning, and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection, so the connection itself is not the problem. Against that, one independent antivirus family reported an adverse result, attributed to alphaMountain.ai and Fortinet. That detection is real but stale, so its timing relative to today is uncertain.
The adverse result is specifically associated with a subdomain of this domain rather than the main portfolio page, which suggests either a compromised subdomain or a domain being reused for phishing. The evidence does not establish which, and it does not show that the main page itself serves anything malicious.
The site's own pages could not be reviewed
The page content could not be read: there was no HTTP response and the request timed out after 30 seconds. That means the site's own page, contact, About and policy text was never reviewed, so claims about who runs the site, how to reach them, or what terms apply cannot be verified from this scan.
What was reviewed is limited to a screenshot showing the name Anton Bondarenko and the line about creating and growing online stores. That is consistent with a personal portfolio, but it is a thin basis for trust when the underlying pages are unreachable and an antivirus vendor has flagged the domain.
Why the score is 62
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
2/ 92
detectionsSaved analysis from September 30, 2026 - stale
2 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 1
- Suspicious
- 1
- Total
- 92
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| alphaMountain.aiMalicious | phishing |
| FortinetSuspicious | spam |
All 92 engine results
- alphaMountain.ai - phishing - Malicious
- Fortinet - spam - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Unrated
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- alphaMountain.aiPhishing
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
АНТОН — БОНДАРЕНКО Создаю и развиваю интернет-магазины
What the captured page showed
2 observations- 01
АНТОН — БОНДАРЕНКО
- 02
Создаю и развиваю интернет-магазины
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Independent evidence classifies the site as content, but the page's own claim could not be captured.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
The search completed without a material external warning or corroborating report.
What remains unverified
2 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Content
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 011 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
- 02The page content could not be read because the request timed out, so the site's own page, contact, About and policy text was not reviewed.
- 03The browser threat feed returned no threat warning for the site.
Web research findings
Independent findings for anba.by, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for anba.by. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainanba.by
- Redirects toanba.by
- Hosted byIndividual Entrepreneur Shlukov Andrey Eduardovich
Domain & Encryption
Certificate issued for anba.by.
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://anba.by/
- 2200https://anba.by/
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentpartial
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 2 of 92 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · analysed Sep 30, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 20, 2026 |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Limited | No saved finding | this scan · Oct 20, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 2 visible observations saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 20, 2026 |
| Independent research | The search completed without a material external finding | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 20, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result2 of 92 engines flagged
- CompletionLimitedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Sep 30, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 20, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionLimitedFindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 20, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result2 visible observations saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 20, 2026
- Independent research
- ResultThe search completed without a material external finding
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 20, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is anba.by a scam or is it safe?
Is anba.by safe to use?
Has anba.by been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is anba.by on any phishing or malware blacklists?
Does anba.by have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is anba.by hosted?
How often is the anba.by report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Portfolio site anba.by carries a stale antivirus flag tied to a phishing subdomain, and its own pages could not be reviewed
anba.by presents itself as the personal portfolio of a web developer, Anton Bondarenko, who advertises building and growing online stores. The visible page text is consistent with that claim, and the saved TLS check shows a valid encrypted connection while the browser threat feed returned no warning. However, one independent antivirus family reported an adverse result, and the site's own page, contact, About and policy text could not be read because the request timed out. That combination — a real but stale detection plus unreadable site pages — means the site cannot be treated as clearly safe, even though nothing in the reviewed evidence shows an active scam aimed at visitors.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of anba.by?Verify and reply