Is bafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link safe?
http://bafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link/
Coveragestrong2 of 4 applicable core capabilities
IPFS gateway subdomain flagged by multiple antivirus vendors as phishing infrastructure
The URL resolves to an IPFS service-worker gateway that antivirus aggregators associate with credential-harvesting campaigns. While the specific CID has no fresh malicious payload evidence, the subdomain pattern is widely abused for phishing and the infrastructure itself is documented as a vector for such attacks.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
The URL resolves to an IPFS service-worker gateway that antivirus aggregators associate with credential-harvesting campaigns. While the specific CID has no fresh malicious payload evidence, the subdomain pattern is widely abused for phishing and the infrastructure itself is documented as a vector for such attacks.
Antivirus and threat-intel signals
Aggregated antivirus data from alphaMountain.ai, Sophos, and Kaspersky labels similar IPFS gateway subdomains as phishing or malicious.
Technical observations
The connection uses a valid TLS certificate and the browser threat feed currently shows no warning for this exact URL.
The host belongs to a decentralized IPFS gateway network that is frequently leveraged by third parties to host phishing pages because content is hard to takedown.
Operator and visitor risk
The subdomain pattern is documented as a platform for credential theft; visitors should avoid entering any login, wallet, or payment details.
Why the score is 35
Saved antivirus evidence is adverse but is not fresh enough for a current conviction. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
20/ 92
detectionsSaved result - stale
20 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 18
- Suspicious
- 2
- Total
- 92
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| alphaMountain.aiMalicious | phishing |
| Chong Lua DaoMalicious | malicious |
| Cluster25Malicious | phishing |
| CyRadarMalicious | phishing |
| EmsisoftMalicious | phishing |
| Forcepoint ThreatSeekerMalicious | phishing |
| FortinetMalicious | phishing |
| KasperskyMalicious | phishing |
| LevelBlueMalicious | phishing |
| LionicMalicious | phishing |
| NetcraftMalicious | malicious |
| RisingMalicious | phishing |
| SeclookupMalicious | malicious |
| SOCRadarMalicious | phishing |
| SophosMalicious | phishing |
| VIPREMalicious | phishing |
| WebrootMalicious | malicious |
| Yandex SafebrowsingMalicious | phishing |
| ESETSuspicious | suspicious |
| GridinsoftSuspicious | suspicious |
All 92 engine results
- alphaMountain.ai - phishing - Malicious
- Chong Lua Dao - malicious - Malicious
- Cluster25 - phishing - Malicious
- CyRadar - phishing - Malicious
- Emsisoft - phishing - Malicious
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - phishing - Malicious
- Fortinet - phishing - Malicious
- Kaspersky - phishing - Malicious
- LevelBlue - phishing - Malicious
- Lionic - phishing - Malicious
- Netcraft - malicious - Malicious
- Rising - phishing - Malicious
- Seclookup - malicious - Malicious
- SOCRadar - phishing - Malicious
- Sophos - phishing - Malicious
- VIPRE - phishing - Malicious
- Webroot - malicious - Malicious
- Yandex Safebrowsing - phishing - Malicious
- ESET - suspicious - Suspicious
- Gridinsoft - suspicious - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - unrated - Clean
- Abusix - clean - Clean
- Acronis - clean - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - clean - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - clean - Clean
- AlienVault - clean - Clean
- AlphaSOC - unrated - Clean
- Antiy-AVL - clean - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- AutoShun - unrated - Clean
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - unrated - Clean
- BitDefender - clean - Clean
- Bkav - unrated - Clean
- BlockList - clean - Clean
- Blueliv - clean - Clean
- Certego - clean - Clean
- ChainPatrol - unrated - Clean
- CINS Army - clean - Clean
- CRDF - clean - Clean
- Criminal IP - clean - Clean
- CSIS Security Group - unrated - Clean
- CTX AI - clean - Clean
- Cyan - unrated - Clean
- Cyble - clean - Clean
- desenmascara.me - clean - Clean
- DNS8 - unrated - Clean
- Dr.Web - clean - Clean
- EmergingThreats - clean - Clean
- Ermes - unrated - Clean
- ESTsecurity - clean - Clean
- Fortra - unrated - Clean
- G-Data - clean - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- Google Safe Browsing - clean - Clean
- GreenSnow - clean - Clean
- GreyNoise - unrated - Clean
- Guardpot - unrated - Clean
- Heimdal Security - clean - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- IPsum - clean - Clean
- Juniper Networks - clean - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - unrated - Clean
- Lumu - unrated - Clean
- Malwared - clean - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - clean - Clean
- MalwareURL - unrated - Clean
- Mimecast - unrated - Clean
- OpenPhish - clean - Clean
- PhishFort - unrated - Clean
- Phishing Database - clean - Clean
- Phishtank - clean - Clean
- PREBYTES - clean - Clean
- PrecisionSec - unrated - Clean
- Quick Heal - clean - Clean
- Quttera - clean - Clean
- SafeToOpen - unrated - Clean
- Sangfor - clean - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - unrated - Clean
- Scantitan - clean - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - clean - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - unrated - Clean
- StopForumSpam - clean - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - clean - Clean
- ThreatHive - clean - Clean
- URLhaus - clean - Clean
- URLQuery - unrated - Clean
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - clean - Clean
- ViriBack - clean - Clean
- VX Vault - clean - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - clean - Clean
- ZeroCERT - clean - Clean
- ZeroFox - unrated - Clean
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
Installation Error: An error occurred while trying to install the service worker.
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Installation Error: An error occurred while trying to install the service worker.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
IPFS Service Worker Gateway | HEAD@4eeddd5
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 92 antivirus results.
What independent research found
1 external finding were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
2 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
Phishing & Impersonation
Service and business model
Unknown
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01Saved antivirus evidence is adverse but is not fresh enough for a current conviction.
Web research findings
Independent findings for bafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- PhishDestroyopen
"operates as an IPFS gateway-based credential theft platform. Analysis indicates the site impersonates legitimate login portals to harvest usernames, passwords, and session tokens"
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainbafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link
- Redirects tobafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link
- Hosted byProtocol Labs
- Referencesdelegated-ipfs.dev · trustless-gateway.link
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
- No direct contact email found on the captured page.
Domain & Encryption
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://bafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link/
- 2200https://bafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link/
Server Reputation
Referenced Domains
Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentpartial
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
Additional evidence review
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 20 of 92 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · Aug 7, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Limited | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Independent research | 1 independent finding were saved | Completed | Adverse | Not available |
- Antivirus
- Result20 of 92 engines flagged
- CompletionLimited
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · Aug 7, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionLimited
- FindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Independent research
- Result1 independent finding were saved
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- FreshnessNot available
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is bafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link a scam or a legit website?
Is bafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link safe to use?
I already paid or entered my details on bafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link — what should I do?
Can I get my money back from bafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link?
Did bafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link steal my password or personal information?
How do I report bafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link?
bafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link looks professional — how can it still be a scam?
Has bafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is bafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the bafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link domain?
Does bafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link have a valid SSL certificate?
How often is the bafkreicrajg7ecnrxbgwcdayhyzemwxmv76owwhy45m6rbkyjikinuxk5e.ipfs.inbrowser.link report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
IPFS gateway subdomain flagged by multiple antivirus vendors as phishing infrastructure
The URL resolves to an IPFS service-worker gateway that antivirus aggregators associate with credential-harvesting campaigns. While the specific CID has no fresh malicious payload evidence, the subdomain pattern is widely abused for phishing and the infrastructure itself is documented as a vector for such attacks.
09 · Community
