Is bafkreicro2whebnx7l7spq5lljamkp2gmfshanufz4vdskn3a3i7gr6ec4.ipfs.inbrowser.link safe?
http://bafkreicro2whebnx7l7spq5lljamkp2gmfshanufz4vdskn3a3i7gr6ec4.ipfs.inbrowser.link/
Coveragestrong2 of 4 applicable core capabilities
IPFS gateway URL flagged by multiple scanners but no confirmed malicious content on this specific CID
The address is an IPFS service-worker gateway (inbrowser.link) serving a single content identifier. Eight of 91 engines label it phishing or suspicious, yet the browser threat feed shows no warning and the hosting IP has zero abuse reports. The page itself failed to render, showing only a service-worker installation error.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
The address is an IPFS service-worker gateway (inbrowser.link) serving a single content identifier. Eight of 91 engines label it phishing or suspicious, yet the browser threat feed shows no warning and the hosting IP has zero abuse reports. The page itself failed to render, showing only a service-worker installation error.
Scanner detections versus gateway context
Eight independent antivirus families and eight of 91 antivirus engines returned adverse results, several explicitly labeling the URL as phishing or suspicious.
The same pattern appears in other IPFS gateway scans; the detections are triggered by the possibility that any CID could host phishing pages rather than by confirmed malicious behavior on this specific address.
Gateway infrastructure and load failure
The domain inbrowser.link is a documented IPFS Subdomain Gateway that routes browser requests to content stored on the InterPlanetary File System via a service worker.
The provided screenshot shows an "Installation Error" message stating that the service worker could not be installed, so no page content was rendered for analysis.
Why the score is 55
8 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
9/ 91
detectionsFresh result
9 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 8
- Suspicious
- 1
- Total
- 91
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| alphaMountain.aiMalicious | phishing |
| Forcepoint ThreatSeekerMalicious | phishing |
| FortinetMalicious | phishing |
| G-DataMalicious | phishing |
| KasperskyMalicious | phishing |
| SOCRadarMalicious | phishing |
| WebrootMalicious | malicious |
| Yandex SafebrowsingMalicious | phishing |
| ESETSuspicious | suspicious |
All 91 engine results
- alphaMountain.ai - phishing - Malicious
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - phishing - Malicious
- Fortinet - phishing - Malicious
- G-Data - phishing - Malicious
- Kaspersky - phishing - Malicious
- SOCRadar - phishing - Malicious
- Webroot - malicious - Malicious
- Yandex Safebrowsing - phishing - Malicious
- ESET - suspicious - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - unrated - Clean
- Abusix - clean - Clean
- Acronis - clean - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - clean - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - clean - Clean
- AlienVault - clean - Clean
- AlphaSOC - unrated - Clean
- Antiy-AVL - clean - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- AutoShun - unrated - Clean
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - unrated - Clean
- BitDefender - clean - Clean
- Bkav - unrated - Clean
- BlockList - clean - Clean
- Blueliv - clean - Clean
- Certego - clean - Clean
- ChainPatrol - unrated - Clean
- Chong Lua Dao - clean - Clean
- CINS Army - clean - Clean
- CRDF - clean - Clean
- Criminal IP - clean - Clean
- CSIS Security Group - unrated - Clean
- CTX AI - clean - Clean
- Cyan - unrated - Clean
- Cyble - clean - Clean
- CyRadar - clean - Clean
- desenmascara.me - clean - Clean
- DNS8 - unrated - Clean
- Dr.Web - clean - Clean
- EmergingThreats - clean - Clean
- Emsisoft - clean - Clean
- Ermes - unrated - Clean
- ESTsecurity - clean - Clean
- Fortra - unrated - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- Google Safe Browsing - clean - Clean
- GreenSnow - clean - Clean
- GreyNoise - unrated - Clean
- Gridinsoft - unrated - Clean
- Guardpot - unrated - Clean
- Heimdal Security - clean - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- IPsum - clean - Clean
- Juniper Networks - clean - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - unrated - Clean
- LevelBlue - clean - Clean
- Lionic - clean - Clean
- Lumu - unrated - Clean
- Malwared - clean - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - clean - Clean
- MalwareURL - unrated - Clean
- Mimecast - unrated - Clean
- Netcraft - unrated - Clean
- OpenPhish - clean - Clean
- PhishFort - unrated - Clean
- Phishing Database - clean - Clean
- Phishtank - clean - Clean
- PREBYTES - clean - Clean
- PrecisionSec - unrated - Clean
- Quick Heal - clean - Clean
- Quttera - clean - Clean
- Rising - clean - Clean
- SafeToOpen - unrated - Clean
- Sangfor - clean - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - unrated - Clean
- Scantitan - clean - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - clean - Clean
- Seclookup - clean - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - unrated - Clean
- Sophos - clean - Clean
- StopForumSpam - clean - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - clean - Clean
- ThreatHive - clean - Clean
- URLhaus - clean - Clean
- URLQuery - unrated - Clean
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - clean - Clean
- VIPRE - unrated - Clean
- ViriBack - clean - Clean
- VX Vault - clean - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - clean - Clean
- ZeroCERT - clean - Clean
- ZeroFox - unrated - Clean
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
Installation Error. An error occurred while trying to install the service worker.
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Installation Error. An error occurred while trying to install the service worker.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
IPFS Service Worker Gateway | HEAD@19e64f8
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 91 antivirus results.
What independent research found
2 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
2 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Unknown
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 018 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result.
- 028/91 engines flag the URL as phishing or suspicious
- 03the browser threat feed returns no threat warning
Web research findings
Independent findings for bafkreicro2whebnx7l7spq5lljamkp2gmfshanufz4vdskn3a3i7gr6ec4.ipfs.inbrowser.link, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- Is bafkreieursegqbjjixv6xjqtpco5i56bt7gtcvisn6tomftwrxy2bzqxzi.ipfs.inbrowser.link Safe? Security Scan Report | PCriskopen
"At the time of this scan, 8 out of 91 security engines flagged the URL, with several classifying it as phishing or suspicious."
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainbafkreicro2whebnx7l7spq5lljamkp2gmfshanufz4vdskn3a3i7gr6ec4.ipfs.inbrowser.link
- Redirects tobafkreicro2whebnx7l7spq5lljamkp2gmfshanufz4vdskn3a3i7gr6ec4.ipfs.inbrowser.link
- Hosted byProtocol Labs
- Referencesdelegated-ipfs.dev · trustless-gateway.net
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
- No direct contact email found on the captured page.
Domain & Encryption
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://bafkreicro2whebnx7l7spq5lljamkp2gmfshanufz4vdskn3a3i7gr6ec4.ipfs.inbrowser.link/
- 2200https://bafkreicro2whebnx7l7spq5lljamkp2gmfshanufz4vdskn3a3i7gr6ec4.ipfs.inbrowser.link/
Server Reputation
Referenced Domains
Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruscomplete
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentpartial
- Analysispartial
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
maliciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
Additional evidence review · Additional evidence review
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 9 of 91 engines flagged | Completed | Adverse | fresh · Sep 4, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Limited | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Independent research | 2 independent findings were saved | Completed | Adverse | Not available |
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionLimited
- FindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Independent research
- Result2 independent findings were saved
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- FreshnessNot available
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is bafkreicro2whebnx7l7spq5lljamkp2gmfshanufz4vdskn3a3i7gr6ec4.ipfs.inbrowser.link a scam or is it safe?
Is bafkreicro2whebnx7l7spq5lljamkp2gmfshanufz4vdskn3a3i7gr6ec4.ipfs.inbrowser.link safe to use?
Has bafkreicro2whebnx7l7spq5lljamkp2gmfshanufz4vdskn3a3i7gr6ec4.ipfs.inbrowser.link been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is bafkreicro2whebnx7l7spq5lljamkp2gmfshanufz4vdskn3a3i7gr6ec4.ipfs.inbrowser.link on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the bafkreicro2whebnx7l7spq5lljamkp2gmfshanufz4vdskn3a3i7gr6ec4.ipfs.inbrowser.link domain?
Does bafkreicro2whebnx7l7spq5lljamkp2gmfshanufz4vdskn3a3i7gr6ec4.ipfs.inbrowser.link have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is bafkreicro2whebnx7l7spq5lljamkp2gmfshanufz4vdskn3a3i7gr6ec4.ipfs.inbrowser.link hosted?
How often is the bafkreicro2whebnx7l7spq5lljamkp2gmfshanufz4vdskn3a3i7gr6ec4.ipfs.inbrowser.link report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
IPFS gateway URL flagged by multiple scanners but no confirmed malicious content on this specific CID
The address is an IPFS service-worker gateway (inbrowser.link) serving a single content identifier. Eight of 91 engines label it phishing or suspicious, yet the browser threat feed shows no warning and the hosting IP has zero abuse reports. The page itself failed to render, showing only a service-worker installation error.
09 · Community