Is bafkreie724md4n57k4hcwxddsehxtsu6mm5yoqgplp43qxjpmsyaazmrra.ipfs.inbrowser.link safe?
http://bafkreie724md4n57k4hcwxddsehxtsu6mm5yoqgplp43qxjpmsyaazmrra.ipfs.inbrowser.link/
Coveragepartial1 of 4 applicable core capabilities
IPFS gateway with mixed antivirus flags but no confirmed malicious behavior
The URL is an IPFS service-worker gateway that currently fails to install due to a TypeError. Six antivirus engines flag the domain, yet the browser threat feed shows no threat. The risk stems from the gateway's ability to serve arbitrary IPFS content rather than any built-in scam or malware mechanism.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
The URL is an IPFS service-worker gateway that currently fails to install due to a TypeError. Six antivirus engines flag the domain, yet the browser threat feed shows no threat. The risk stems from the gateway's ability to serve arbitrary IPFS content rather than any built-in scam or malware mechanism.
Antivirus detections versus safe-browsing clearance
Six independent antivirus families (alphaMountain.ai, Fortinet, Kaspersky and others) returned an adverse result for the domain.
the browser threat feed returned no threat warning for the same URL.
Gateway failure and IPFS content risk
The page displays an installation error stating that an error occurred while trying to install the service worker.
The domain functions as a transparent redirect for IPFS public gateways, routing visitors to the inbrowser.link service-worker gateway.
Why the score is 62
6 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
9/ 92
detectionsSaved result - stale
9 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 6
- Suspicious
- 3
- Total
- 92
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| alphaMountain.aiMalicious | phishing |
| FortinetMalicious | phishing |
| KasperskyMalicious | phishing |
| SophosMalicious | phishing |
| WebrootMalicious | malicious |
| Yandex SafebrowsingMalicious | phishing |
| Forcepoint ThreatSeekerSuspicious | suspicious |
| LevelBlueSuspicious | suspicious |
| SOCRadarSuspicious | suspicious |
All 92 engine results
- alphaMountain.ai - phishing - Malicious
- Fortinet - phishing - Malicious
- Kaspersky - phishing - Malicious
- Sophos - phishing - Malicious
- Webroot - malicious - Malicious
- Yandex Safebrowsing - phishing - Malicious
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - suspicious - Suspicious
- LevelBlue - suspicious - Suspicious
- SOCRadar - suspicious - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - unrated - Clean
- Abusix - clean - Clean
- Acronis - clean - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - clean - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - clean - Clean
- AlienVault - clean - Clean
- AlphaSOC - unrated - Clean
- Antiy-AVL - clean - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- AutoShun - unrated - Clean
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - unrated - Clean
- BitDefender - clean - Clean
- Bkav - unrated - Clean
- BlockList - clean - Clean
- Blueliv - clean - Clean
- Certego - clean - Clean
- ChainPatrol - unrated - Clean
- Chong Lua Dao - clean - Clean
- CINS Army - clean - Clean
- Cluster25 - unrated - Clean
- CRDF - clean - Clean
- Criminal IP - unrated - Clean
- CSIS Security Group - unrated - Clean
- CTX AI - clean - Clean
- Cyan - unrated - Clean
- Cyble - clean - Clean
- CyRadar - clean - Clean
- desenmascara.me - clean - Clean
- DNS8 - unrated - Clean
- Dr.Web - clean - Clean
- EmergingThreats - clean - Clean
- Emsisoft - clean - Clean
- Ermes - unrated - Clean
- ESET - clean - Clean
- ESTsecurity - clean - Clean
- Fortra - unrated - Clean
- G-Data - clean - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- Google Safe Browsing - clean - Clean
- GreenSnow - clean - Clean
- GreyNoise - unrated - Clean
- Gridinsoft - unrated - Clean
- Guardpot - unrated - Clean
- Heimdal Security - clean - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- IPsum - clean - Clean
- Juniper Networks - clean - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - unrated - Clean
- Lionic - clean - Clean
- Lumu - unrated - Clean
- Malwared - clean - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - clean - Clean
- MalwareURL - unrated - Clean
- Mimecast - unrated - Clean
- Netcraft - unrated - Clean
- OpenPhish - clean - Clean
- PhishFort - unrated - Clean
- Phishing Database - clean - Clean
- Phishtank - clean - Clean
- PREBYTES - clean - Clean
- PrecisionSec - unrated - Clean
- Quick Heal - clean - Clean
- Quttera - clean - Clean
- Rising - clean - Clean
- SafeToOpen - unrated - Clean
- Sangfor - clean - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - unrated - Clean
- Scantitan - clean - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - clean - Clean
- Seclookup - clean - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - unrated - Clean
- StopForumSpam - clean - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - clean - Clean
- ThreatHive - clean - Clean
- URLhaus - clean - Clean
- URLQuery - unrated - Clean
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - clean - Clean
- VIPRE - unrated - Clean
- ViriBack - clean - Clean
- VX Vault - clean - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - clean - Clean
- ZeroCERT - clean - Clean
- ZeroFox - unrated - Clean
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
Installation Error: An error occurred while trying to install the service worker.
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Installation Error: An error occurred while trying to install the service worker.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
IPFS Service Worker Gateway | HEAD@19e64f8
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 92 antivirus results.
What independent research found
1 external finding were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
3 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Unknown
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 016 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
- 02the browser threat feed shows no threat warning.
- 03Page fails to install service worker with a TypeError.
Web research findings
Independent findings for bafkreie724md4n57k4hcwxddsehxtsu6mm5yoqgplp43qxjpmsyaazmrra.ipfs.inbrowser.link, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for bafkreie724md4n57k4hcwxddsehxtsu6mm5yoqgplp43qxjpmsyaazmrra.ipfs.inbrowser.link. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainbafkreie724md4n57k4hcwxddsehxtsu6mm5yoqgplp43qxjpmsyaazmrra.ipfs.inbrowser.link
- Redirects tobafkreie724md4n57k4hcwxddsehxtsu6mm5yoqgplp43qxjpmsyaazmrra.ipfs.inbrowser.link
- Hosted byProtocol Labs
- Referencesdelegated-ipfs.dev · trustless-gateway.net
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
- No direct contact email found on the captured page.
Domain & Encryption
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://bafkreie724md4n57k4hcwxddsehxtsu6mm5yoqgplp43qxjpmsyaazmrra.ipfs.inbrowser.link/
- 2200https://bafkreie724md4n57k4hcwxddsehxtsu6mm5yoqgplp43qxjpmsyaazmrra.ipfs.inbrowser.link/
Server Reputation
Referenced Domains
Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentpartial
- Analysispartial
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
Additional evidence review
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 9 of 92 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · Aug 28, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Limited | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Independent research | 1 independent finding were saved | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
- Antivirus
- Result9 of 92 engines flagged
- CompletionLimited
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · Aug 28, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionLimited
- FindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Independent research
- Result1 independent finding were saved
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- FreshnessNot available
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is bafkreie724md4n57k4hcwxddsehxtsu6mm5yoqgplp43qxjpmsyaazmrra.ipfs.inbrowser.link a scam or is it safe?
Is bafkreie724md4n57k4hcwxddsehxtsu6mm5yoqgplp43qxjpmsyaazmrra.ipfs.inbrowser.link safe to use?
Has bafkreie724md4n57k4hcwxddsehxtsu6mm5yoqgplp43qxjpmsyaazmrra.ipfs.inbrowser.link been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is bafkreie724md4n57k4hcwxddsehxtsu6mm5yoqgplp43qxjpmsyaazmrra.ipfs.inbrowser.link on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the bafkreie724md4n57k4hcwxddsehxtsu6mm5yoqgplp43qxjpmsyaazmrra.ipfs.inbrowser.link domain?
Does bafkreie724md4n57k4hcwxddsehxtsu6mm5yoqgplp43qxjpmsyaazmrra.ipfs.inbrowser.link have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is bafkreie724md4n57k4hcwxddsehxtsu6mm5yoqgplp43qxjpmsyaazmrra.ipfs.inbrowser.link hosted?
How often is the bafkreie724md4n57k4hcwxddsehxtsu6mm5yoqgplp43qxjpmsyaazmrra.ipfs.inbrowser.link report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
IPFS gateway with mixed antivirus flags but no confirmed malicious behavior
The URL is an IPFS service-worker gateway that currently fails to install due to a TypeError. Six antivirus engines flag the domain, yet the browser threat feed shows no threat. The risk stems from the gateway's ability to serve arbitrary IPFS content rather than any built-in scam or malware mechanism.
09 · Community