Is bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link safe?
http://bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link/
Coveragestrong3 of 4 applicable core capabilities
IPFS gateway URL flagged by 11 security engines as phishing and serving only a broken service-worker error
This address is not a normal commercial website. It is an IPFS content gateway under the inbrowser.link namespace, a technical mechanism for exposing decentralized files through a browser, and the page currently returns only an installation error about a service worker. The decisive concern is threat intelligence: an aggregate scan records 11 malicious and 2 suspicious detections across 93 engines, with 11 independent antivirus families reporting an adverse result, including alphaMountain.ai, Emsisoft and ESET. Clean the browser threat feed and valid TLS results show no additional technical warning, but they do not clear a host that security vendors have flagged as phishing. The operator is undisclosed and the site's own contact and policy pages were not read in full, so there is no trustworthy explanation for the flagged host or the content it is meant to serve.
Be the first to review bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link
Lost money to bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link? Warn others
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
This address is not a normal commercial website. It is an IPFS content gateway under the inbrowser.link namespace, a technical mechanism for exposing decentralized files through a browser, and the page currently returns only an installation error about a service worker. The decisive concern is threat intelligence: an aggregate scan records 11 malicious and 2 suspicious detections across 93 engines, with 11 independent antivirus families reporting an adverse result, including alphaMountain.ai, Emsisoft and ESET. Clean the browser threat feed and valid TLS results show no additional technical warning, but they do not clear a host that security vendors have flagged as phishing. The operator is undisclosed and the site's own contact and policy pages were not read in full, so there is no trustworthy explanation for the flagged host or the content it is meant to serve.
The decisive signal: phishing detections by multiple vendors
An aggregate reputation scan records 11 malicious detections and 2 suspicious ones across 93 engines. Those negative results are not a single noisy vendor: 11 independent antivirus families flagged this host, and the listed families include alphaMountain.ai, Emsisoft and ESET. A host of this kind belongs in the high-risk band because the engine consensus points to phishing use, meaning the address has been seen hosting content built to imitate a legitimate page or harvest credentials.
Clean results elsewhere do not cancel that out. The browser threat feed returned no threat warning and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection, but both of those simply say no additional warning was raised at scan time and the connection is encrypted. Neither verifies who runs the host or what it will serve next.
The technical wrapper is legitimate; the host's reputation is not
The address itself is an IPFS gateway URL under the inbrowser.link namespace, which is commonly used to expose content stored on the InterPlanetary File System through a standard browser. That is a neutral technical mechanism, not a fraud signal on its own.
What the address actually returns is far less reassuring. The page shows an installation error stating an error occurred while trying to install a service worker for the same long IPFS identifier, so a visitor arriving here gets a broken gateway, not content. The site's own contact and policy text was never read in full, and no operator, company or contact details are disclosed in what was observed, so there is nothing to explain who published the content or why it is being flagged.
Why the score is 30
11 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
13/ 93
detectionsFresh result
13 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 11
- Suspicious
- 2
- Total
- 93
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| alphaMountain.aiMalicious | phishing |
| EmsisoftMalicious | phishing |
| ESETMalicious | phishing |
| FortinetMalicious | phishing |
| KasperskyMalicious | phishing |
| LevelBlueMalicious | phishing |
| LionicMalicious | phishing |
| NetcraftMalicious | malicious |
| RisingMalicious | phishing |
| WebrootMalicious | malicious |
| Yandex SafebrowsingMalicious | phishing |
| ErmesSuspicious | not recommended |
| Forcepoint ThreatSeekerSuspicious | suspicious |
All 93 engine results
- alphaMountain.ai - phishing - Malicious
- Emsisoft - phishing - Malicious
- ESET - phishing - Malicious
- Fortinet - phishing - Malicious
- Kaspersky - phishing - Malicious
- LevelBlue - phishing - Malicious
- Lionic - phishing - Malicious
- Netcraft - Malicious
- Rising - phishing - Malicious
- Webroot - Malicious
- Yandex Safebrowsing - phishing - Malicious
- Ermes - not recommended - Suspicious
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
Installation Error: An error occurred while trying to install the service worker.
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Installation Error: An error occurred while trying to install the service worker.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
IPFS Service Worker Gateway | HEAD@7256355
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 61 antivirus results.
What independent research found
1 external finding was saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
1 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
Phishing & Impersonation
Service and business model
Unknown
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 0111 malicious and 2 suspicious detections across 93 engines, with 11 independent antivirus families reporting adverse results including alphaMountain.ai, Emsisoft and ESET.
- 0211 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result.
- 03The host is an IPFS gateway URL under the inbrowser.link namespace, a standard mechanism for exposing decentralized content through a browser.
Web research findings
Independent findings for bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainbafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link
- Redirects tobafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link
- Hosted byProtocol Labs
- Referencesdelegated-ipfs.dev · trustless-gateway.net
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
Domain & Encryption
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link/
- 2200https://bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link/
Server Reputation
Referenced Domains
Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruscomplete
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentpartial
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
maliciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
11 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. · The page returns only an installation error about failing to install a service worker for the same IPFS identifier, rather than functional content.
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 13 of 93 engines flagged | Completed | Adverse | fresh · analysed Oct 19, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Limited | No saved finding | this scan · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Independent research | 1 independent finding was saved | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 19, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result13 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessfresh · analysed Oct 19, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 19, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionLimited
- FindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 19, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 19, 2026
- Independent research
- Result1 independent finding was saved
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 19, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link a scam or a legit website?
Is bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link safe to use?
I already paid or entered my details on bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link — what should I do?
Can I get my money back from bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link?
Did bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link steal my password or personal information?
How do I report bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link?
bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link looks professional — how can it still be a scam?
Has bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link domain?
Does bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link have a valid SSL certificate?
How often is the bafkreiezmd4nzibsiqhijt2gwbek2z2vephne4pl43m2v36m7lg7enzyuy.ipfs.inbrowser.link report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
IPFS gateway URL flagged by 11 security engines as phishing and serving only a broken service-worker error
This address is not a normal commercial website. It is an IPFS content gateway under the inbrowser.link namespace, a technical mechanism for exposing decentralized files through a browser, and the page currently returns only an installation error about a service worker. The decisive concern is threat intelligence: an aggregate scan records 11 malicious and 2 suspicious detections across 93 engines, with 11 independent antivirus families reporting an adverse result, including alphaMountain.ai, Emsisoft and ESET. Clean the browser threat feed and valid TLS results show no additional technical warning, but they do not clear a host that security vendors have flagged as phishing. The operator is undisclosed and the site's own contact and policy pages were not read in full, so there is no trustworthy explanation for the flagged host or the content it is meant to serve.
09 · Community