Is c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com safe?
http://c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: strong · 5 of 6 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (57 of 93 engines answered): completed
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading · not available: did not fully complete
- page capture · not available: did not fully complete
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
Randomized subdomain is blocked by DNS filtering lists and flagged by one antivirus engine, and its page refused all connections.
This host is a long random hexadecimal subdomain under a 531-day-old parent domain. Two independent HaGeZi DNS blocklists carry it, one antivirus family (VIPRE) reported it as adverse, and the server refused the connection when the page was fetched, so its own content, contact and policy text were never reviewed. The browser threat feed returned no warning and a valid TLS certificate exists, but the address was served over plain HTTP with no redirect. With no readable content and no operator identity, the evidence points to transient or abusive infrastructure rather than a legitimate service.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 38/100
High Risk covers scores 21–44. 1 finding pulled the score down; 2 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- Moderate1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result.
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe registrable domain is 531 days old (8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com, the parent domain of this subdomain host; it does not show how long the subdomain itself has existed)
- SupportsThe browser threat feed returned no threat warning
No points per finding are stored for this report: our analysis weighed all findings together to set the score. Each finding shows its saved severity instead (Decisive, Strong, Moderate or Minor). Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
Lost money or shared details on c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com? Do this now
Act quickly: the first hours matter most for a chargeback.
- Call your bank or card issuer now
Ask them to dispute the charge or open a chargeback; the sooner you act, the better your odds. Card payments can often be reversed. Bank transfers and gift cards are harder, but report them to your bank too. Crypto payments usually cannot be reversed: report the wallet address and transaction ID to the exchange you sent from.
- Change any password you entered
If you entered a password on c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com, change it there and anywhere you reused it, and turn on two-factor authentication. Keep screenshots, order confirmations and messages as evidence.
- Report the site
Reports help get scam sites taken down faster and warn other people.
- Report the domain to its registrar
GoDaddy.com, LLC takes abuse reports at abuse@godaddy.com (480-624-2505). Include the address and what happened.
- Ignore anyone offering to recover your money
"Recovery" services or agents who contact you, or ask for a fee up front, are almost always a second scam aimed at victims. Your bank's dispute process and the official reporting services never charge a fee in advance.
Full answers about refunds and reporting are in the Safety FAQ below.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
This host is a long random hexadecimal subdomain under a 531-day-old parent domain. Two independent HaGeZi DNS blocklists carry it, one antivirus family (VIPRE) reported it as adverse, and the server refused the connection when the page was fetched, so its own content, contact and policy text were never reviewed. The browser threat feed returned no warning and a valid TLS certificate exists, but the address was served over plain HTTP with no redirect. With no readable content and no operator identity, the evidence points to transient or abusive infrastructure rather than a legitimate service.
Blocklisted and flagged, with no vendor consensus
The host appears in HaGeZi's Multi LIGHT basic-protection list and in the wildcard entries of HaGeZi's Multi PRO mini list, both of which are used to filter ads, trackers and badware. Being listed on two independent filtering feeds is a concrete adverse signal about how this infrastructure is used.
Antivirus results are mixed rather than unanimous: one independent antivirus family, VIPRE, reported an adverse result, while the aggregate shows a single detection across 93 engines with no vendor consensus. That is a moderate technical signal, not proof of a specific payload.
The site itself could not be read
The fetch was refused outright (connection refused on port 80), so the site's own page, contact, About and policy text was never reviewed. Nothing about the operator, its purpose or its commercial model can be confirmed from the site itself.
The registrable parent domain is 531 days old, which is context only and says nothing about how long this particular subdomain has existed. The host name is a long random hexadecimal string, a pattern common to automated or obfuscated web operations, and no operator identity is established.
Clean checks do not offset the blocklist record
The browser threat feed returned no threat warning, and a valid TLS certificate exists for the host. These are absence-of-detection results, not evidence of safe operation, and they do not explain why two DNS filtering feeds carry the domain.
The scanned address was served over plain HTTP with no redirect to HTTPS, so any traffic to it would be unencrypted despite the certificate. Combined with the blocklist entries and the refused connection, the technical picture is of disposable infrastructure rather than a maintained public service.
Why the score is 38
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
1/ 93
detectionsFresh result
1 engine flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 1
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 93
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| VIPREMalicious | malware |
All 93 engine results
- VIPRE - malware - Malicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Unrated
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Unrated
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Unrated
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- Googletechnology
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
No page claim could be verified for c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com because no usable page content or saved capture was available.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
2 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
1 of the 6 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
Web research findings
Independent findings for c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainc.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com
- Redirects toc.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com
- Hosted byServers.com B.V.
Domain Timeline
- May 16, 2025Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 1.4 years old when this review was saved.
- Oct 29, 2026Saved security review — Rated High Risk
The completed checks from this saved scan are detailed above.
Domain & Encryption
Report this domain to its registrar: send the address and what happened to this contact.
Certificate issued for 8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com.
Server Reputation
Sites linked to this one
Other sites we have reports for that share something checkable with this one. A shared detail is a lead to compare, not proof that the sites have the same owner or the same risk; each keeps its own rating.
On the same server IP
Also served from 185.106.140.166 (Servers.com B.V.). Unrelated sites can share a server, so this is a lead, not proof.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruscomplete
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentunavailable
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidenceunavailable
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result.
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 1 of 93 engines flagged | Completed | Adverse | fresh · analysed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 29, 2026 |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | The saved page capture was not reliable enough to use | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Independent research | 2 independent findings were saved | Completed | Adverse | this scan · Oct 29, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result1 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionCompletedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessfresh · analysed Oct 29, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 29, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionUnavailableFindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- ResultThe saved page capture was not reliable enough to use
- CompletionUnavailableFindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Independent research
- Result2 independent findings were saved
- CompletionCompletedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 29, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com a scam or a legit website?
Is c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com safe to use?
What should I do if I already gave my details to c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com?
Can I get my money back from c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com?
Is my device at risk after visiting c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com?
How do I report c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com?
Why does c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com look legitimate if it's a scam?
Has c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com domain?
Does c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com have a valid SSL certificate?
How often is the c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Randomized subdomain is blocked by DNS filtering lists and flagged by one antivirus engine, and its page refused all connections.
The written conclusion remains part of the saved report.
This host is a long random hexadecimal subdomain under a 531-day-old parent domain. Two independent HaGeZi DNS blocklists carry it, one antivirus family (VIPRE) reported it as adverse, and the server refused the connection when the page was fetched, so its own content, contact and policy text were never reviewed. The browser threat feed returned no warning and a valid TLS certificate exists, but the address was served over plain HTTP with no redirect. With no readable content and no operator identity, the evidence points to transient or abusive infrastructure rather than a legitimate service.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of c.8806daeca4718ab0ce5a415659a5659fcb22c9fac2a7ed431ade8b9f.com?Verify and reply