Is cdn.staticsee.com safe?
http://cdn.staticsee.com/
cdn.staticsee.com flagged as phishing infrastructure for scam shops
This CDN domain fails to load directly but is repeatedly identified hosting assets for fake e-commerce phishing sites that impersonate retailers with urgency timers and fake discounts. 8 VirusTotal engines detect it as malicious/phishing; external reports confirm use in Black Friday and warehouse sale scams.
Read the full analysisLoading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
This CDN domain fails to load directly but is repeatedly identified hosting assets for fake e-commerce phishing sites that impersonate retailers with urgency timers and fake discounts. 8 VirusTotal engines detect it as malicious/phishing; external reports confirm use in Black Friday and warehouse sale scams.
Site appearance and function
Direct access returns only a proxy upstream failed error with no content, scripts, or forms visible. The domain functions as a static asset host rather than a standalone site.
Strongest evidence and limitations
VirusTotal reports 8 malicious detections (including phishing labels from alphaMountain.ai, CyRadar, ESET, Fortinet) out of 92 engines. Independent reports document its use in credential-harvesting fake shops. Limitations include unavailable page content scan, clean Google Safe Browsing result, and no observed credential collection on this exact visit.
Practical user impact
Visiting or clicking links that load resources from this domain risks exposure to phishing pages or malware downloads. Treat any site pulling assets from cdn.staticsee.com as high risk and avoid interaction.
Why the score is 20
7 independent antivirus familyies reported an adverse result. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
Fresh result
8 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 8
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 92
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| ADMINUSLabsMalicious | malicious |
| alphaMountain.aiMalicious | phishing |
| Chong Lua DaoMalicious | malicious |
| CyRadarMalicious | phishing |
| ESETMalicious | phishing |
| FortinetMalicious | phishing |
| GridinsoftMalicious | phishing |
| LionicMalicious | phishing |
All 92 engine results
- ADMINUSLabs - malicious - Malicious
- alphaMountain.ai - phishing - Malicious
- Chong Lua Dao - malicious - Malicious
- CyRadar - phishing - Malicious
- ESET - phishing - Malicious
- Fortinet - phishing - Malicious
- Gridinsoft - phishing - Malicious
- Lionic - phishing - Malicious
- 0xSI_f33d - unrated - Clean
- Abusix - clean - Clean
- Acronis - clean - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - clean - Clean
- AlienVault - clean - Clean
- AlphaSOC - unrated - Clean
- Antiy-AVL - clean - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- AutoShun - unrated - Clean
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - unrated - Clean
- BitDefender - clean - Clean
- Bkav - unrated - Clean
- BlockList - clean - Clean
- Blueliv - clean - Clean
- Certego - clean - Clean
- ChainPatrol - unrated - Clean
- CINS Army - clean - Clean
- Cluster25 - unrated - Clean
- CRDF - clean - Clean
- Criminal IP - unrated - Clean
- CSIS Security Group - unrated - Clean
- CTX AI - clean - Clean
- Cyan - unrated - Clean
- Cyble - clean - Clean
- desenmascara.me - clean - Clean
- DNS8 - unrated - Clean
- Dr.Web - clean - Clean
- EmergingThreats - clean - Clean
- Emsisoft - clean - Clean
- Ermes - unrated - Clean
- ESTsecurity - clean - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - clean - Clean
- Fortra - unrated - Clean
- G-Data - clean - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- Google Safe Browsing - clean - Clean
- GreenSnow - clean - Clean
- GreyNoise - unrated - Clean
- Guardpot - unrated - Clean
- Heimdal Security - clean - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- IPsum - clean - Clean
- Juniper Networks - clean - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - unrated - Clean
- Kaspersky - unrated - Clean
- LevelBlue - clean - Clean
- Lumu - unrated - Clean
- Malwared - clean - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - clean - Clean
- MalwareURL - unrated - Clean
- Mimecast - unrated - Clean
- Netcraft - unrated - Clean
- OpenPhish - clean - Clean
- PhishFort - unrated - Clean
- Phishing Database - clean - Clean
- Phishtank - clean - Clean
- PREBYTES - clean - Clean
- PrecisionSec - unrated - Clean
- Quick Heal - clean - Clean
- Quttera - clean - Clean
- Rising - clean - Clean
- SafeToOpen - unrated - Clean
- Sangfor - clean - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - unrated - Clean
- Scantitan - clean - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - clean - Clean
- Seclookup - clean - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - unrated - Clean
- SOCRadar - unrated - Clean
- Sophos - clean - Clean
- StopForumSpam - clean - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - clean - Clean
- ThreatHive - clean - Clean
- URLhaus - clean - Clean
- URLQuery - unrated - Clean
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - clean - Clean
- VIPRE - unrated - Clean
- ViriBack - clean - Clean
- VX Vault - clean - Clean
- Webroot - clean - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - unrated - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - clean - Clean
- ZeroCERT - clean - Clean
- ZeroFox - unrated - Clean
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Captured during this scan in a safe sandbox. Opening this report does not revisit the site. Marker positions are approximate. See full visual analysis →
Visual context from the captured page
White page displaying only 'proxy upstream failed'
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
White page displaying only 'proxy upstream failed'
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
- 1
What the site claims
The page presents itself as a service operating on cdn.staticsee.com.
- 2
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
- 3
What independent research found
2 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
- 4
What remains unverified
2 of the five core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
Phishing & Impersonation
Also observed: Fake Shop & Commercial Deception
Service and business model
Unknown
Unknown
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 017 independent antivirus familyies reported an adverse result.
Web research findings
Independent findings for cdn.staticsee.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
Domain Timeline
- Aug 26, 2024Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 1.9 years old today.
- Jul 31, 2026Saved security review — Flagged as dangerous
The completed checks from this saved scan are detailed above.
Domain & Encryption
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
Malware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
Additional evidence review
Operator / customer risk
Complaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 8 of 92 engines flagged | Completed | Adverse | fresh · Jul 31, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Independent research | 2 independent findings were saved | Completed | Adverse | Not available |
- Page content
- Result: Page content was not available for semantic review
- Unavailable
- No saved finding
- Visual evidence
- Result: 1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- Completed
- No adverse finding
- Independent research
- Result: 2 independent findings were saved
- Completed
- Adverse
07 · Community
Community
08 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

0 community contributions
Share what happened, what the site requested, and what others should watch for.
Community reviews never change the scanner verdict.