Is confirmation.com safe?
http://confirmation.com/
Confirmation.com is a legitimate Thomson Reuters audit confirmation platform (domain since 1998)
The site at confirmation.com is the official platform for secure electronic audit confirmations used by banks and accounting firms worldwide. The scanner encountered a proxy upstream failure preventing page load, but all security signals are clean with no threats detected. Strong evidence includes 28-year domain age, Thomson Reuters ownership, zero malware/phishing flags, and independent reviews confirming legitimacy.
Read the full analysisLoading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
The site at confirmation.com is the official platform for secure electronic audit confirmations used by banks and accounting firms worldwide. The scanner encountered a proxy upstream failure preventing page load, but all security signals are clean with no threats detected. Strong evidence includes 28-year domain age, Thomson Reuters ownership, zero malware/phishing flags, and independent reviews confirming legitimacy.
What the site provides
Confirmation.com operates as a specialized login portal and SaaS platform for electronic audit confirmations between auditors, banks, and clients. It is owned and operated by Thomson Reuters and has processed millions of confirmations globally since its founding in 1999.
Strongest evidence and limitations
Domain registered 1998-04-28 (10,321 days old) via MarkMonitor; hosted on Thomson Reuters IP 155.46.210.9 with zero abuse reports. Google Safe Browsing clean. VirusTotal partial scan shows zero malicious detections. The only limitation is the scanner's proxy failure and unavailable page content fetch; no deceptive behavior or credential harvesting observed.
Practical user impact
Legitimate users (auditors and financial institutions) can safely access the service for official confirmations. No risk of malware, phishing, or subscription traps. The proxy error is a transient scanner issue unrelated to site safety.
Why the score is 92
The saved analysis does not include enough completed checks for a Safe rating. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
Saved result - stale
No detections across 92 engines
No antivirus engine in this saved scan raised an adverse result. This is one signal, not a guarantee.
- Malicious
- 0
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 92
All 92 engine results
- 0xSI_f33d - unrated - Clean
- Abusix - clean - Clean
- Acronis - clean - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - clean - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - clean - Clean
- AlienVault - clean - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - clean - Clean
- AlphaSOC - unrated - Clean
- Antiy-AVL - clean - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- AutoShun - unrated - Clean
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - unrated - Clean
- BitDefender - clean - Clean
- Bkav - unrated - Clean
- BlockList - clean - Clean
- Blueliv - clean - Clean
- Certego - clean - Clean
- ChainPatrol - unrated - Clean
- Chong Lua Dao - clean - Clean
- CINS Army - clean - Clean
- Cluster25 - unrated - Clean
- CRDF - clean - Clean
- Criminal IP - unrated - Clean
- CSIS Security Group - unrated - Clean
- CTX AI - clean - Clean
- Cyan - unrated - Clean
- Cyble - clean - Clean
- CyRadar - clean - Clean
- desenmascara.me - clean - Clean
- DNS8 - unrated - Clean
- Dr.Web - clean - Clean
- EmergingThreats - clean - Clean
- Emsisoft - clean - Clean
- Ermes - unrated - Clean
- ESET - clean - Clean
- ESTsecurity - clean - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - clean - Clean
- Fortinet - clean - Clean
- Fortra - unrated - Clean
- G-Data - clean - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- Google Safe Browsing - clean - Clean
- GreenSnow - clean - Clean
- GreyNoise - unrated - Clean
- Gridinsoft - unrated - Clean
- Guardpot - unrated - Clean
- Heimdal Security - clean - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- IPsum - clean - Clean
- Juniper Networks - clean - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - unrated - Clean
- Kaspersky - clean - Clean
- LevelBlue - clean - Clean
- Lionic - clean - Clean
- Lumu - unrated - Clean
- Malwared - clean - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - clean - Clean
- MalwareURL - unrated - Clean
- Mimecast - unrated - Clean
- Netcraft - unrated - Clean
- OpenPhish - clean - Clean
- PhishFort - unrated - Clean
- Phishing Database - clean - Clean
- Phishtank - clean - Clean
- PREBYTES - clean - Clean
- PrecisionSec - unrated - Clean
- Quick Heal - clean - Clean
- Quttera - clean - Clean
- Rising - clean - Clean
- SafeToOpen - unrated - Clean
- Sangfor - clean - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - unrated - Clean
- Scantitan - clean - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - clean - Clean
- Seclookup - clean - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - unrated - Clean
- SOCRadar - unrated - Clean
- Sophos - clean - Clean
- StopForumSpam - clean - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - clean - Clean
- ThreatHive - clean - Clean
- URLhaus - clean - Clean
- URLQuery - unrated - Clean
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - clean - Clean
- VIPRE - unrated - Clean
- ViriBack - clean - Clean
- VX Vault - clean - Clean
- Webroot - clean - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - clean - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - clean - Clean
- ZeroCERT - clean - Clean
- ZeroFox - unrated - Clean
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Captured during this scan in a safe sandbox. Opening this report does not revisit the site.
Visual context from the captured page
Page displays only 'proxy upstream failed'
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Page displays only 'proxy upstream failed'
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
- 1
What the site claims
The page presents itself as a login portal service.
- 2
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
- 3
What independent research found
2 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
- 4
What remains unverified
3 of the five core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Login Portal
Subscription
Observed behavior
Web research findings
Independent findings for confirmation.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
Domain Timeline
- Apr 28, 1998Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 28 years old today.
- Jul 31, 2026Saved security review — Reviewed as safe
This saved scan found no active threat signals in the checks it completed.
confirmation.com has operated for years with no threat signals in this review — a long, stable track record, though it is never a guarantee on its own.
Domain & Encryption
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
Malware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Operator / customer risk
Complaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 0 of 92 engines flagged | Limited | No saved finding | stale fallback · Jul 31, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Independent research | 2 independent findings were saved | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
- Antivirus
- Result: 0 of 92 engines flagged
- Limited
- No saved finding
- Freshness: stale fallback · Jul 31, 2026
- Page content
- Result: Page content was not available for semantic review
- Unavailable
- No saved finding
- Visual evidence
- Result: 1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- Completed
- No adverse finding
- Independent research
- Result: 2 independent findings were saved
- Completed
- No adverse finding
07 · Community
Community
08 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

0 community contributions
Share what happened, what the site requested, and what others should watch for.
Community reviews never change the scanner verdict.