Is cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev safe?
http://cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev/
Coveragestrong3 of 4 applicable core capabilities
Cloudflare Workers subdomain flagged as phishing by two antivirus engines while its page fails to load
This address is a randomly generated Cloudflare Workers subdomain, a free serverless hosting slot that anyone can deploy code to. Two independent antivirus families, LevelBlue and URLQuery, have flagged it as malicious, specifically for phishing, and the page itself would not render during review, showing only a loading failure. The browser threat feed returned no warning and the connection was encrypted, but those are baseline hygiene facts, not evidence of a trustworthy operator. Because the site's own pages could not be read and no legitimate purpose or reputation is visible, the score sits in the High Risk band.
Be the first to review cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev
Lost money to cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev? Warn others
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
This address is a randomly generated Cloudflare Workers subdomain, a free serverless hosting slot that anyone can deploy code to. Two independent antivirus families, LevelBlue and URLQuery, have flagged it as malicious, specifically for phishing, and the page itself would not render during review, showing only a loading failure. The browser threat feed returned no warning and the connection was encrypted, but those are baseline hygiene facts, not evidence of a trustworthy operator. Because the site's own pages could not be read and no legitimate purpose or reputation is visible, the score sits in the High Risk band.
What the security checks actually show
The strongest adverse signal is a multi-engine scan result: 2 malicious and 0 suspicious detections across 93 engines, with two independent antivirus families reporting an adverse result, named as LevelBlue and URLQuery. A phishing classification from multiple vendors is a concrete, target-bound warning about what this host has been serving, not a generic category guess.
Counter-evidence exists and should be weighed honestly: the browser threat feed returned no threat warning, and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection. Neither clears the site. Safe Browsing is a lagging indicator and a valid certificate only proves the connection is encrypted, not that the operator is honest. A phishing page can sit behind HTTPS just as easily as a legitimate one.
No readable content and no accountable operator
The page failed to load during review, displaying only 'Loading failed' for the host. That means the site's own text, contact details, About page and policies were never read in full, so there is no way to confirm what the site claims to be or who runs it. A host that cannot be inspected cannot be vouched for.
The address itself is a Cloudflare Workers subdomain, a free serverless deployment slot with a randomly generated name. That infrastructure is used by legitimate developers and by malicious redirect and phishing pages alike, so it provides no identity, no business registration and no accountability. Combined with the phishing flags and the unreadable page, there is nothing here that supports trusting the operator.
Why the score is 30
2 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
2/ 93
detectionsFresh result
2 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 2
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 93
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| LevelBlueMalicious | phishing |
| URLQueryMalicious | malicious |
All 93 engine results
- LevelBlue - phishing - Malicious
- URLQuery - Malicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Unrated
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Clean
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
Loading failed
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Loading failed
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
The captured page did not expose a clear title or service claim.
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 60 antivirus results.
What independent research found
The search completed without a material external warning or corroborating report.
What remains unverified
1 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
Phishing & Impersonation
Service and business model
Unknown
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01Two independent antivirus families, LevelBlue and URLQuery, reported an adverse result, with 2 malicious and 0 suspicious detections across 93 engines.
- 022 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result.
- 03The page failed to load, showing only 'Loading failed', and the site's own contact details were not reviewed.
Web research findings
Independent findings for cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domaincq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev
- Redirects tocq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev
- Hosted byCloudflare, Inc.
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
Domain & Encryption
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruscomplete
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentpartial
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
2 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. · The page failed to load, showing only 'Loading failed', and the site's own contact details were not reviewed.
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 2 of 93 engines flagged | Completed | Adverse | fresh · analysed Oct 23, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 23, 2026 |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Limited | No saved finding | this scan · Oct 23, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 23, 2026 |
| Independent research | The search completed without a material external finding | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 23, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result2 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessfresh · analysed Oct 23, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 23, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionLimited
- FindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 23, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 23, 2026
- Independent research
- ResultThe search completed without a material external finding
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 23, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev a scam or a legit website?
Is cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev safe to use?
What should I do if I already gave my details to cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev?
Can I get my money back from cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev?
Did cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev steal my password or personal information?
How do I report cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev?
Why does cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev look legitimate if it's a scam?
Has cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev domain?
Does cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev have a valid SSL certificate?
How often is the cq6d-kp22-3ota.talennvalyo8gy83.workers.dev report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Cloudflare Workers subdomain flagged as phishing by two antivirus engines while its page fails to load
This address is a randomly generated Cloudflare Workers subdomain, a free serverless hosting slot that anyone can deploy code to. Two independent antivirus families, LevelBlue and URLQuery, have flagged it as malicious, specifically for phishing, and the page itself would not render during review, showing only a loading failure. The browser threat feed returned no warning and the connection was encrypted, but those are baseline hygiene facts, not evidence of a trustworthy operator. Because the site's own pages could not be read and no legitimate purpose or reputation is visible, the score sits in the High Risk band.
09 · Community