Is darkfat.com safe?

http://darkfat.com/

High RiskStatus

Coveragestrong2 of 4 applicable core capabilities

Verdict

Darkfat.com is a redirector that funnels visitors into unlicensed gambling sites.

The domain automatically forwards traffic through unrelated domains to reach slot-gambling destinations. Multiple security vendors flag it for phishing and proxy avoidance, and the operator provides no licensing or contact details.

Avoid the site; it is a known redirector to unlicensed gambling platforms and carries moderate-to-high operator risk.
Read full analysis
No saved capture is availableThe verdict remains based on the completed checks below.
3 antivirus engines flagged this URLFortinet, Webroot, Gridinsoft
Calibrated safety spectrum

Where this site sits

  1. Dangerous1–20
  2. High Risk21–44
  3. Moderate Risk45–69
  4. Low Risk70–84
  5. Safe85–100

The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.

01 · Investigation Brief

Investigation Brief

The domain automatically forwards traffic through unrelated domains to reach slot-gambling destinations. Multiple security vendors flag it for phishing and proxy avoidance, and the operator provides no licensing or contact details.

Security-vendor flags and redirect behavior

Fortinet, Webroot, and Gridinsoft list the domain for phishing, malicious activity, and proxy avoidance.

The site functions as a redirect hub, automatically forwarding visitors through unrelated domains before reaching a final gambling destination.

Technical checks versus operator risk

The domain is 1544 days old and the hosting IP shows no abuse reports; the browser threat feed and TLS checks are clean.

Despite clean technical signals, the operator identity is unknown and the site participates in traffic-brokering schemes that funnel users to gambling platforms.

How visitors reach the gambling destination

A visitor lands on darkfat.com and is immediately redirected through a chain of unrelated domains before arriving at a slot-gambling site.

Why the score is 35

Saved antivirus evidence is adverse but is not fresh enough for a current conviction. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.

02 · Security Evidence

Security evidence

Collected signals and independent provider data for this URL.

Antivirus Engines

3/ 92

detections

Saved result - stale

3 engines flagged this URL

Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.

Malicious
2
Suspicious
1
Total
92
Adverse antivirus results
EngineFinding
FortinetMaliciousphishing
WebrootMaliciousmalicious
GridinsoftSuspicioussuspicious
All 92 engine results
  • Fortinet - phishing - Malicious
  • Webroot - malicious - Malicious
  • Gridinsoft - suspicious - Suspicious
  • 0xSI_f33d - unrated - Clean
  • Abusix - clean - Clean
  • Acronis - clean - Clean
  • ADMINUSLabs - clean - Clean
  • AILabs (MONITORAPP) - clean - Clean
  • AlienVault - clean - Clean
  • alphaMountain.ai - clean - Clean
  • AlphaSOC - unrated - Clean
  • Antiy-AVL - clean - Clean
  • ArcSight Threat Intelligence - unrated - Clean
  • AutoShun - unrated - Clean
  • Bfore.Ai PreCrime - unrated - Clean
  • BitDefender - clean - Clean
  • Bkav - unrated - Clean
  • BlockList - clean - Clean
  • Blueliv - clean - Clean
  • Certego - clean - Clean
  • ChainPatrol - unrated - Clean
  • Chong Lua Dao - unrated - Clean
  • CINS Army - clean - Clean
  • Cluster25 - unrated - Clean
  • CRDF - clean - Clean
  • Criminal IP - unrated - Clean
  • CSIS Security Group - unrated - Clean
  • CTX AI - clean - Clean
  • Cyan - unrated - Clean
  • Cyble - clean - Clean
  • CyRadar - clean - Clean
  • desenmascara.me - clean - Clean
  • DNS8 - unrated - Clean
  • Dr.Web - clean - Clean
  • EmergingThreats - clean - Clean
  • Emsisoft - clean - Clean
  • Ermes - unrated - Clean
  • ESET - clean - Clean
  • ESTsecurity - clean - Clean
  • Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - clean - Clean
  • Fortra - unrated - Clean
  • G-Data - clean - Clean
  • GCP Abuse Intelligence - unrated - Clean
  • Google Safe Browsing - clean - Clean
  • GreenSnow - clean - Clean
  • GreyNoise - unrated - Clean
  • Guardpot - unrated - Clean
  • Heimdal Security - clean - Clean
  • Hunt.io Intelligence - unrated - Clean
  • IPsum - clean - Clean
  • Juniper Networks - clean - Clean
  • K7AntiVirus - unrated - Clean
  • Kaspersky - clean - Clean
  • LevelBlue - clean - Clean
  • Lionic - clean - Clean
  • Lumu - unrated - Clean
  • Malwared - clean - Clean
  • MalwarePatrol - clean - Clean
  • MalwareURL - unrated - Clean
  • Mimecast - unrated - Clean
  • Netcraft - unrated - Clean
  • OpenPhish - clean - Clean
  • PhishFort - unrated - Clean
  • Phishing Database - clean - Clean
  • Phishtank - clean - Clean
  • PREBYTES - clean - Clean
  • PrecisionSec - unrated - Clean
  • Quick Heal - clean - Clean
  • Quttera - clean - Clean
  • Rising - clean - Clean
  • SafeToOpen - unrated - Clean
  • Sangfor - clean - Clean
  • Sansec eComscan - unrated - Clean
  • Scantitan - clean - Clean
  • SCUMWARE.org - clean - Clean
  • Seclookup - clean - Clean
  • Snort IP sample list - unrated - Clean
  • SOCRadar - unrated - Clean
  • Sophos - clean - Clean
  • StopForumSpam - clean - Clean
  • Sucuri SiteCheck - clean - Clean
  • ThreatHive - clean - Clean
  • URLhaus - clean - Clean
  • URLQuery - unrated - Clean
  • Viettel Threat Intelligence - clean - Clean
  • VIPRE - unrated - Clean
  • ViriBack - clean - Clean
  • VX Vault - clean - Clean
  • Xcitium Verdict Cloud - unrated - Clean
  • Yandex Safebrowsing - clean - Clean
  • ZeroCERT - clean - Clean
  • ZeroFox - unrated - Clean

Security Scans

Browser Threat Feed
Not flagged on major threat lists

Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.

03 · Investigation Story

Investigation story

The behavior, reputation, and operator evidence that explains how this site may affect a visitor.
  1. What the site claims

    Independent evidence classifies the site as gambling, but the page's own claim could not be captured.

  2. What we observed

    Saved browser evidence recorded forced redirects.

  3. What independent research found

    2 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.

  4. What remains unverified

    2 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.

What kind of site and risk is this?

Threat category

Crypto Casino & Gambling Fraud

Service and business model

Gambling

Transaction

Observed behavior

Forced Redirects

Evidence behind this classification

  1. 01Saved antivirus evidence is adverse but is not fresh enough for a current conviction.

Web research findings

Independent findings for darkfat.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.

Business registration
No public record found
Could not match the site to a registered company — common for small sites.
Clone check
No clone detected
The completed research found no supported clone indicator.
Typosquat check
No look-alike match
The completed research found no supported look-alike match.
Web mentions
2 scam reports
Scam reports (2)
Direct quotes from public scam databases, forums, and news.
  • Gridinsoftopen

    "Low Trust Online Casino This site is classified as Low Trust Online Casino based on multiple risk signals"

  • GitHubopen

    "These are web proxies."

Reputation Sources

How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.

Google Safe Browsing
Not listedCheck ↗
VirusTotal
ListedCheck ↗
AbuseIPDB
Not listedCheck ↗

04 · Domain & Infrastructure

Domain & infrastructure

Timeline · identity · encryption · redirects · hosting

The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.

Infrastructure map

How the saved page connected to the wider web.

  1. Domaindarkfat.com
  2. Redirects toairhost.es
  3. Hosted byCloudflare, Inc.

Domain Timeline

  1. May 21, 2022
    Domain registered

    First appeared in WHOIS records — 4.2 years old today.

  2. Aug 13, 2026
    Saved security review — Flagged as suspicious

    The completed checks from this saved scan are detailed above.

darkfat.com is an established domain now carrying threat signals. An older domain that starts tripping security checks is a classic pattern for an asset that was sold, repurposed, or compromised — the age alone is not reassurance.

Domain & Encryption

Domain History
Age4 years old
RegistrarGoDaddy.com, LLC
RegisteredMay 21, 2022
ExpiresMay 21, 2027
Owner privacyUnknown
Encryption Certificate
StatusValid
ProtocolTLSv1.3
IssuerGoogle Trust Services · WE1
ExpiresNov 5, 2026 (84d)
Self-signedNo
Hosting & Technology
HostingCloudflare, Inc.
Server locationUS

Redirect Chain

Hops
10
Cross-domain
Yes
Lookalike
No
Punycode
No
  • 1301http://darkfat.com/
  • 2301https://darkfat.com/
  • 3301https://nezha2.es/cross-domain
  • 4301https://popspizzapasta.ca/cross-domain
  • 5301https://kinestesia.es/cross-domain
  • 6301https://store.material.com.tw/cross-domain
  • 7301https://laddboxtest.se/cross-domain
  • 8301https://memorybook.es/cross-domain
  • 9301https://lasabrosa.es/cross-domain
  • 10301https://airhost.es/cross-domain

Server Reputation

Abuse Intelligence
Confidence score0%
Reports on file0
ISPCloudflare, Inc.
Usage typeContent Delivery Network

05 · Evidence Ledger

Evidence ledger

Coverage, provenance, and source freshness remain separate so a missing check is never mistaken for a clean result.
  1. Antiviruspartial
  2. Browser threat feedcomplete
  3. Page contentunavailable
  4. Analysiscomplete
  5. Visual evidenceunavailable
Completed analysis

The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.

Technical threat

suspicious

Malware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.

Additional evidence review

Operator / customer risk

unknown

Complaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.

No confirmed evidence in this dimension.

Source coverage and freshness

Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.

Antivirus
Result3 of 92 engines flagged
CompletionLimited
FindingAdverse
Freshnessstale fallback · Aug 13, 2026
Browser protection
ResultNo browser threat-list match
CompletionCompleted
FindingNo adverse finding
FreshnessNot available
Page content
ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
CompletionUnavailable
FindingNo saved finding
FreshnessNot available
Visual evidence
ResultThe saved page capture was not reliable enough to use
CompletionUnavailable
FindingNo saved finding
FreshnessNot available
Independent research
Result2 independent findings were saved
CompletionCompleted
FindingAdverse
FreshnessNot available

06 · Your Next Move

Your next move

Unlicensed casino / gambling warning signs

This looks like an unlicensed crypto-casino / betting site — the kind promoted through fake celebrity ads.

  1. Treat darkfat.com as unverified

    Do not enter credentials or send money until you have independently verified the business.

  2. Don't deposit, connect a wallet, or sign up

    Unlicensed crypto casinos rig the games and freeze withdrawals — treat any crypto you deposit as gone. "Bonuses" exist to lock your money behind impossible wagering requirements.

  3. Check for a real gambling licence before trusting any casino

    Legitimate casinos show a verifiable licence number (UKGC, MGA, or a state gaming board) you can confirm on the regulator's own website. No licence, or an unverifiable one, means no protection.

  4. If you already deposited, act fast

    Crypto transfers are usually irreversible — report the wallet to the exchange you sent from and to IC3 (ic3.gov). Card deposits may be chargeback-eligible; contact your bank. Ignore any "recovery agent" who contacts you afterward — that's a second scam.

    Open

07 · Safety FAQ

Safety FAQ

Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

Is darkfat.com a scam or a legit casino?
darkfat.com shows strong warning signs of being a crypto casino & gambling fraud — do not deposit funds or connect a wallet. Our review tagged it for gambling. 3 of 92 security engines flag it (2 as outright malicious). The domain is 4.2 years old through GoDaddy.com, LLC. It may not be an outright scam, but the risk is high enough that you should verify it independently before trusting it with money or data.
Is darkfat.com safe to use?
darkfat.com has a Safety Score of 35/100 (High Risk). Analysis coverage is strong at 81%. Avoid login, payment and downloads.
What should I do if I already sent funds to darkfat.com?
If you've already paid or handed over details on darkfat.com, act quickly. 1) Cryptocurrency payments are almost always irreversible, so a bank chargeback usually won't apply — instead report the wallet address to the exchange you sent from and ask them to flag it. 2) Report the site to the U.S. FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov or the FBI's IC3 at ic3.gov, and in the UK to Action Fraud at actionfraud.police.uk. 3) If you entered a password, change it on darkfat.com and anywhere you reused it, and turn on two-factor authentication. 4) Watch your bank and email for follow-up fraud, and keep screenshots as evidence.
Can I get my money back from darkfat.com?
Possibly, but it's difficult. Crypto transfers can't be reversed like card payments, so recovery usually depends on the receiving exchange freezing the funds — report the wallet address and transaction ID to that exchange and to IC3 (ic3.gov) as fast as you can. Be very wary of "recovery agents" who contact you promising to get your crypto back; that is almost always a second scam targeting victims.
Is darkfat.com a licensed, regulated casino?
We found no evidence of a verifiable gambling licence for darkfat.com, and it lists no real operator or company details. Legitimate casinos prominently display a licence number from a regulator (like the UKGC, MGA, or a state gaming board) that you can check on the regulator's own website. Unlicensed crypto-casino sites frequently let you deposit and even "win," then block or void withdrawals — so treat any winnings shown on screen as bait, not money you can actually take out.
How do I report darkfat.com?
You can report darkfat.com through several official channels: the U.S. FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov, the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) at ic3.gov, and — in the UK — Action Fraud at actionfraud.police.uk. You can also flag it to Google Safe Browsing (safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish) so other browsers warn about it, and report it to the company being impersonated if there is one. Reporting helps get scam sites taken down faster.
Why does darkfat.com look legitimate if it's a scam?
Modern scams are built to look convincing. A valid SSL padlock, a polished template, stock photos, fake reviews, and a trust badge can all be added in minutes and prove nothing about who runs the site. Scammers buy cheap domains, clone real designs, and copy legal pages wholesale. That's exactly why an automated review that checks the domain's age, hosting, blacklists, and behaviour — rather than just how the page looks — is more reliable than a first impression.
Has darkfat.com been flagged by antivirus engines?
Yes. 3 of 92 antivirus and blocklist engines in our malware network flagged darkfat.com, 2 of them as outright malicious. Even a single detection from a reputable engine is a meaningful warning, and multiple detections rarely happen by accident.
Is darkfat.com on any phishing or malware blacklists?
No — darkfat.com is not currently on the major browser blocklist feeds that Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Edge rely on. Note that blocklists can lag behind brand-new scam domains, so "not listed" is reassuring but not a guarantee on its own.
How old is the darkfat.com domain?
darkfat.com is 4.2 years old, registered on May 21, 2022 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. A multi-year registration history is one of the stronger signals against a scam, though it's never a guarantee on its own — established domains can still be misused.
Does darkfat.com have a valid SSL certificate?
Yes — darkfat.com presents a valid TLSv1.3 certificate issued by Google Trust Services · WE1, valid for another 84 days. Important caveat: SSL only encrypts the connection between you and the site — it does not verify who runs it. Almost all scam sites now have valid SSL too, so a padlock alone never means "safe".
How often is the darkfat.com report updated?
This report is a record of the scan run on August 13, 2026, and the verdict reflects that point in time. Scam sites change fast — they can go live, get flagged, or vanish within days — so if you believe something about darkfat.com has changed, MalwareTips staff can run a fresh scan that re-checks every signal from scratch and republishes an updated verdict.

08 · Final Verdict

Final verdict

The saved conclusion, decisive evidence, and practical action in one final view.
Verdict score
35/100
High Risk

Darkfat.com is a redirector that funnels visitors into unlicensed gambling sites.

Saved capturedarkfat.comCapture-safe
No saved screenshot was available for this report.
Conclusion

The domain automatically forwards traffic through unrelated domains to reach slot-gambling destinations. Multiple security vendors flag it for phishing and proxy avoidance, and the operator provides no licensing or contact details.

Recommended actionAvoid the site; it is a known redirector to unlicensed gambling platforms and carries moderate-to-high operator risk.
Saved evidence only

Missing checks are never treated as a clean result.

Scan another URL
Continue toCommunity

09 · Community

Community

First-hand experiences add human context after the scanner has reached its conclusion.