Is datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev safe?
https://datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev/dl/eyJ0IjoicjIiLCJmIjoiTGVnZW5kIG9mIFplbGRhIFRlYXJzIG9mIHRoZSBLaW5nZG9tLkJhc2UuTlNQIiwiYyI6ImFwcGxpY2F0aW9uL29jdGV0LXN0cmVhbSIsImUiOjE3OTIxNDA3MDAsImsiOiJ1cGxvYWRzL2ZkZWM5NmY5LTNhY2YtNDRlMS1iODE0LWYwZWQzODY3YjBiMi9MZWdlbmQgb2YgWmVsZGEgVGVhcnMgb2YgdGhlIEtpbmdkb20uQmFzZS5OU1AifQ.2f76819d5a5235701bdbabf1c398357a7f3078f23cae379e8fc52e53b51ba965
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: strong · 3 of 4 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (59 of 93 engines answered): completed
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading · limited: did not fully complete
- page capture: completed
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
Expired file link for a Nintendo Switch game file, flagged by two antivirus engines
This address is a direct download link on a shared Cloudflare Workers subdomain. It now only shows a 'Link expired' notice, so the page itself could not be reviewed. Two of 93 antivirus engines (BitDefender and G-Data) flagged this URL as malicious. That is a small but real adverse signal for an unofficial file download, so we rate it High Risk.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 40/100
High Risk covers scores 21–44. 1 finding pulled the score down; 2 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- Strong1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result.
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe browser threat feed gave no warning.
- SupportsThe saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection
No points per finding are stored for this report: our analysis weighed all findings together to set the score. Each finding shows its saved severity instead (Decisive, Strong, Moderate or Minor). Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
Lost money or shared details on datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev? Do this now
Act quickly: the first hours matter most for a chargeback.
- Call your bank or card issuer now
Ask them to dispute the charge or open a chargeback; the sooner you act, the better your odds. Card payments can often be reversed. Bank transfers and gift cards are harder, but report them to your bank too. Crypto payments usually cannot be reversed: report the wallet address and transaction ID to the exchange you sent from.
- Change any password you entered
If you entered a password on datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev, change it there and anywhere you reused it, and turn on two-factor authentication. Keep screenshots, order confirmations and messages as evidence.
- Report the site
Reports help get scam sites taken down faster and warn other people.
- Report the domain to its registrar
The registrar is the company that sold this domain. ICANN's lookup shows the registrar's abuse contact.
- Ignore anyone offering to recover your money
"Recovery" services or agents who contact you, or ask for a fee up front, are almost always a second scam aimed at victims. Your bank's dispute process and the official reporting services never charge a fee in advance.
Full answers about refunds and reporting are in the Safety FAQ below.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
This address is a direct download link on a shared Cloudflare Workers subdomain. It now only shows a 'Link expired' notice, so the page itself could not be reviewed. Two of 93 antivirus engines (BitDefender and G-Data) flagged this URL as malicious. That is a small but real adverse signal for an unofficial file download, so we rate it High Risk.
What the checks found
Two antivirus engines out of 93 reported this link as malicious, and none marked it suspicious. Both detections, from BitDefender and G-Data, count as one independent antivirus family.
The browser threat feed gave no warning, and the connection is properly encrypted. These results mean nothing was detected; they do not show that the file is safe.
Who runs it and what the page shows
The link returned HTTP 410, meaning the content is gone. The only visible text was 'Link expired — please go back and click Download again.' There were no contact, About or policy pages to review.
Our research found only a public DataDock source-code project. Nothing ties that project to this deployment, so the operator is unidentified. The hosting IP has no abuse reports.
Why the score is 40
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
2/ 93
detectionsFresh result
2 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 2
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 93
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| BitDefenderMalicious | malware |
| G-DataMalicious | malware |
All 93 engine results
- BitDefender - malware - Malicious
- G-Data - malware - Malicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Unrated
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Clean
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekerweb hosting
- Sophosinformation technology
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
Link expired — please go back and click Download again.
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Link expired — please go back and click Download again.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Independent evidence classifies the site as downloader, but the page's own claim could not be captured.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
1 external finding was saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
1 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
Malware & Deceptive Downloads
Service and business model
Downloader
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 012 of 93 engines flagged the link as malicious.
- 021 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result.
- 03The link has expired (HTTP 410), so the page content was not reviewed.
Web research findings
Independent findings for datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domaindatadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev
- Redirects todatadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev
- Hosted byCloudflare, Inc.
Domain & Encryption
Certificate issued for datadock.workers.dev.
A shared Cloudflare address answers for many sites, so it is not the site's own server and says nothing about who runs it.
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruscomplete
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentpartial
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result.
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 2 of 93 engines flagged | Completed | Adverse | fresh · analysed Oct 16, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 16, 2026 |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Limited | No saved finding | this scan · Oct 16, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 16, 2026 |
| Independent research | 1 independent finding was saved | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 16, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result2 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionCompletedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessfresh · analysed Oct 16, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 16, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionLimitedFindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 16, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 16, 2026
- Independent research
- Result1 independent finding was saved
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 16, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev a scam or a legit download site?
Is datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev safe to use?
I already paid or entered my details on datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev — what should I do?
Can I get my money back from datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev?
Is my device infected after visiting datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev?
How do I report datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev?
datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev looks professional — how can it still be a scam?
Has datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev domain?
Does datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev have a valid SSL certificate?
How often is the datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Expired file link for a Nintendo Switch game file, flagged by two antivirus engines
This address is a direct download link on a shared Cloudflare Workers subdomain. It now only shows a 'Link expired' notice, so the page itself could not be reviewed. Two of 93 antivirus engines (BitDefender and G-Data) flagged this URL as malicious. That is a small but real adverse signal for an unofficial file download, so we rate it High Risk.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of datadock-dl.datadock.workers.dev?Verify and reply