Is dlink10.com safe?
http://dlink10.com/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: strong · 5 of 6 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (58 of 93 engines answered) · saved result: did not fully complete
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading: completed
- page capture: completed
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
dlink10.com is a bare mirror landing page for Clictune.com with no reviewed contact details and no independent reputation
The page at dlink10.com shows only a short line identifying it as a "Mirror domain of Clictune.com" with a status of ok, so it is a thin redirect/mirror stub rather than a real service of its own. The domain is 97 days old, and the only saved antivirus observation is a single suspicious mark from an older analysis, while the browser threat feed returned no threat warning. The site's own contact details were not reviewed because the page text was not read in full, and independent research only surfaced a Chrome extension listing that references the domain. Nothing here shows malware, phishing, or a payment trap, but the site is also too thin and too new to call safe.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 62/100
Moderate Risk covers scores 45–69. 1 finding pulled the score down; 1 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- Moderate1 antivirus result marked the URL as suspicious. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe browser threat feed returned no threat warning for this host.
No points per finding are stored for this report: our analysis weighed all findings together to set the score. Each finding shows its saved severity instead (Decisive, Strong, Moderate or Minor). Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
The page at dlink10.com shows only a short line identifying it as a "Mirror domain of Clictune.com" with a status of ok, so it is a thin redirect/mirror stub rather than a real service of its own. The domain is 97 days old, and the only saved antivirus observation is a single suspicious mark from an older analysis, while the browser threat feed returned no threat warning. The site's own contact details were not reviewed because the page text was not read in full, and independent research only surfaced a Chrome extension listing that references the domain. Nothing here shows malware, phishing, or a payment trap, but the site is also too thin and too new to call safe.
A thin mirror stub, not a service
The only content captured from the page is the line "Mirror domain of Clictune.com - status ok dlink10.com". That tells a visitor the domain exists to point at another service, but it does not explain what Clictune is, who runs it, or what a visitor is expected to do here.
Independent research returned a single neutral record tying the domain to a Chrome extension listing, which is consistent with mirror infrastructure for a browser-side service rather than a standalone website. That record does not confirm the operator's identity or intent.
The site's own contact details were not reviewed because the page text was not read in full, so we cannot say what contact information, if any, the site publishes.
No active threat detected, but no safety proof either
The browser threat feed returned no threat warning for this host, and the saved antivirus observation contains only a single suspicious mark from an older analysis rather than a confirmed malware or phishing detection. Neither result is a clean bill of health; they simply mean no active threat was flagged at scan time.
A valid TLS certificate exists for the host, but the scanned address was served over plain HTTP with no redirect to HTTPS, so the connection to it was not encrypted. On a page this bare that is a minor concern, but it means anything typed into it would travel unprotected.
The registrable domain is only 97 days old, so there is no long operating history to weigh in its favour, and the operator's public reputation remains unverified beyond the mirror claim itself.
Why the score is 62
The score combines saved deterministic evidence with the grounded analysis available for this report. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
1/ 93
detectionsSaved analysis from October 18, 2026 - stale
1 engine flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 0
- Suspicious
- 1
- Total
- 93
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| alphaMountain.aiSuspicious | suspicious |
All 93 engine results
- alphaMountain.ai - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Unrated
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- alphaMountain.aiSuspicious, Newly Registered
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
Mirror domain of Clictune.com - status ok
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Mirror domain of Clictune.com - status ok
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
The captured page appears to offer a content service.
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 58 antivirus results.
What independent research found
1 external finding was saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
1 of the 6 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Content
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01The page identifies itself only as a mirror domain of Clictune.com with a status of ok.
- 02The registrable domain is 97 days old, giving no established operating history.
- 031 antivirus result marked the URL as suspicious. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
Web research findings
Independent findings for dlink10.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for dlink10.com. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domaindlink10.com
- Redirects todlink10.com
- Hosted byCloudflare, Inc.
Domain Timeline
- Jul 27, 2026Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 3 months old when this review was saved.
- Nov 2, 2026Saved security review — Rated Moderate Risk
The evidence in this saved scan is mixed or incomplete; the completed checks are detailed above.
dlink10.com was registered very recently when this review was saved. Freshly-registered domains are disproportionately used for scams, so a young domain whose evidence is mixed or incomplete warrants extra caution.
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
Domain & Encryption
Cloudflare DNS is used by legitimate and scam sites alike, so it does not identify who runs the site.
Certificate issued for dlink10.com.
A shared Cloudflare address answers for many sites, so it is not the site's own server and says nothing about who runs it.
Payment providers the page loads
None seen among the outside domains we saved.
Read from the first 20 outside domains the page loads and the shop platform it uses; the web server and platform rows are under Hosting & Technology. A payment script on the page does not prove the shop accepts that method at checkout, or that you are protected.
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentcomplete
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
unknownMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
1 antivirus result marked the URL as suspicious. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 1 of 93 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · analysed Oct 18, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Nov 2, 2026 |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Nov 2, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Nov 2, 2026 |
| Independent research | 1 independent finding was saved | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Nov 2, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result1 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionLimitedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Oct 18, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Nov 2, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Nov 2, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Nov 2, 2026
- Independent research
- Result1 independent finding was saved
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Nov 2, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is dlink10.com a scam or is it safe?
Is dlink10.com safe to use?
Has dlink10.com been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is dlink10.com on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the dlink10.com domain?
Does dlink10.com have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is dlink10.com hosted?
How often is the dlink10.com report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
dlink10.com is a bare mirror landing page for Clictune.com with no reviewed contact details and no independent reputation
The page at dlink10.com shows only a short line identifying it as a "Mirror domain of Clictune.com" with a status of ok, so it is a thin redirect/mirror stub rather than a real service of its own. The domain is 97 days old, and the only saved antivirus observation is a single suspicious mark from an older analysis, while the browser threat feed returned no threat warning. The site's own contact details were not reviewed because the page text was not read in full, and independent research only surfaced a Chrome extension listing that references the domain. Nothing here shows malware, phishing, or a payment trap, but the site is also too thin and too new to call safe.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of dlink10.com?Verify and reply