Is environmentchallenge.org safe?
http://environmentchallenge.org/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: strong · 5 of 6 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (59 of 93 engines answered) · saved result: did not fully complete
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading: completed
- page capture: completed
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
Environment Challenge is an unfinished nonprofit 'skeleton' site soliciting development funding, not a scam operation.
Environment Challenge (environmentchallenge.org) presents itself as a project of MaximumGood Inc., an IRS-approved 501(c)(3) nonprofit founded in 2004. The live page is transparent about its own incompleteness: it states the website needs funding to be completed, especially to pay a web developer, and that only a logo and a skeleton site with a masthead, footer, register/login features and About Us pages exist so far. Independent research corroborates the operator's nonprofit status through ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer. No phishing, malware, fake-shop, or payment-fraud mechanics were observed. The score reflects a low-risk but unpolished site: the operator identity is verifiable, yet the site is a placeholder soliciting donations and its own pages are thin.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 78/100
Low Risk covers scores 70–84. 1 finding pulled the score down; 3 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- Strong1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe operator is a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit founded in 2004, corroborated by ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer.
- SupportsNo Safe Browsing warning and a valid TLS connection were observed.
- SupportsThe registrable domain is 4454 days old
No points per finding are stored for this report: our analysis weighed all findings together to set the score. Each finding shows its saved severity instead (Decisive, Strong, Moderate or Minor). Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
Environment Challenge (environmentchallenge.org) presents itself as a project of MaximumGood Inc., an IRS-approved 501(c)(3) nonprofit founded in 2004. The live page is transparent about its own incompleteness: it states the website needs funding to be completed, especially to pay a web developer, and that only a logo and a skeleton site with a masthead, footer, register/login features and About Us pages exist so far. Independent research corroborates the operator's nonprofit status through ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer. No phishing, malware, fake-shop, or payment-fraud mechanics were observed. The score reflects a low-risk but unpolished site: the operator identity is verifiable, yet the site is a placeholder soliciting donations and its own pages are thin.
A verifiable nonprofit behind an unfinished site
The site's operator is MaximumGood Inc., which describes itself as an IRS-approved 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofit founded in 2004 and states that donations are tax deductible. That claim is independently corroborated by ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer, which lists Maximumgood Inc of Watertown, MA as tax-exempt since June 2004. This is a real registered entity, not an anonymous storefront.
The site is candid about its own state. Its own text says the website needs funding to be completed, especially to pay for a web developer to build features and pages, and that only a logo and a skeleton website with a masthead, footer, register/login features and About Us pages have been created. A screenshot observation confirms the same message is visible on the page. This is a solicitation for development funding, not a deceptive commercial funnel.
No technical threats or deceptive commercial mechanics observed
The browser threat feed returned no threat warning for the domain, and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection. The domain is also long-established at 4454 days old. These are clean technical signals, though they only mean no detections were recorded, not that the site is fully trustworthy.
One saved antivirus observation records an adverse result from a single engine family (Lumu and Fortinet), but this is a stale, partial detection rather than a fresh confirmation of active malware. No phishing forms, fake checkout pages, or deceptive download controls were observed on the site. The page does link out to other domains, including maximumgood.org and dailysource.org, which are consistent with the operator's stated network of nonprofit-focused websites rather than an affiliate or monetization scheme.
Why the score is 78
The saved checks found no material threat, but the evidence was not strong enough for the highest Safe tier. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
2/ 93
detectionsSaved analysis from October 23, 2026 - stale
2 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 1
- Suspicious
- 1
- Total
- 93
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| LumuMalicious | malware |
| FortinetSuspicious | spam |
All 93 engine results
- Lumu - malware - Malicious
- Fortinet - spam - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Unrated
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekerinformation technology
- Googlecivil_society_and_npo
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
Want to help us create this website? This website needs funding to be completed, especially to pay for a web developer to build features and pages.
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Want to help us create this website? This website needs funding to be completed, especially to pay for a web developer to build features and pages.
What the page says about itself
What the site says about itself, quoted from the pages we read. The site wrote these words; they are not our findings.
- Page title
New MaximumGood website
Pages we read
- Main page/Read
- About page/about-us/Read
- Terms/terms-of-service/Could not be read
- Contact page/contact/Read
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
New MaximumGood website
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 59 antivirus results.
What independent research found
2 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
1 of the 6 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Content
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01The site openly states it is a skeleton needing funding for development, which is transparent rather than deceptive.
- 02The operator is a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit founded in 2004, corroborated by ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer.
- 03No Safe Browsing warning and a valid TLS connection were observed.
Web research findings
Independent findings for environmentchallenge.org, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- MaximumGood About Usopen
"We are an IRS-approved 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofit organization and all donations are tax deductible. We were founded in 2004."
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainenvironmentchallenge.org
- Redirects toenvironmentchallenge.org
- Hosted byNew Dream Network, LLC
- Referencesgmpg.org · cdnjs.cloudflare.com
Domain Timeline
- Aug 20, 2014Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 12 years old when this review was saved.
- Oct 31, 2026Saved security review — Rated Low Risk
This saved scan found no material threat, but the evidence was not strong enough for the highest Safe tier.
environmentchallenge.org has operated for years and this review found no material threat — a long track record, though it is never a guarantee on its own.
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
- Phone number listed (34231-7479).
- Postal address visible on the page.
Domain & Encryption
Certificate issued for www.environmentchallenge.org.
Scripts, fonts and CDNs
- cdnjs
Payment providers the page loads
None seen among the outside domains we saved.
Read from the first 20 outside domains the page loads and the shop platform it uses; the web server and platform rows are under Hosting & Technology. A payment script on the page does not prove the shop accepts that method at checkout, or that you are protected.
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://environmentchallenge.org/
- 2206https://environmentchallenge.org/
Server Reputation
Referenced Domains
Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentcomplete
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 2 of 93 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · analysed Oct 23, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 31, 2026 |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 31, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 31, 2026 |
| Independent research | 2 independent findings were saved | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 31, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result2 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionLimitedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Oct 23, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 31, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 31, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 31, 2026
- Independent research
- Result2 independent findings were saved
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 31, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is environmentchallenge.org a scam or is it safe?
Is environmentchallenge.org safe to use?
Has environmentchallenge.org been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is environmentchallenge.org on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the environmentchallenge.org domain?
Does environmentchallenge.org have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is environmentchallenge.org hosted?
How often is the environmentchallenge.org report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Environment Challenge is an unfinished nonprofit 'skeleton' site soliciting development funding, not a scam operation.
Environment Challenge (environmentchallenge.org) presents itself as a project of MaximumGood Inc., an IRS-approved 501(c)(3) nonprofit founded in 2004. The live page is transparent about its own incompleteness: it states the website needs funding to be completed, especially to pay a web developer, and that only a logo and a skeleton site with a masthead, footer, register/login features and About Us pages exist so far. Independent research corroborates the operator's nonprofit status through ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer. No phishing, malware, fake-shop, or payment-fraud mechanics were observed. The score reflects a low-risk but unpolished site: the operator identity is verifiable, yet the site is a placeholder soliciting donations and its own pages are thin.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of environmentchallenge.org?Verify and reply