Is fajddluzs6da4gfu7ijikmp65t2xgwunl5vgdq6xqncqvk3bimueaiad.onion safe?
http://fajddluzs6da4gfu7ijikmp65t2xgwunl5vgdq6xqncqvk3bimueaiad.onion/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: partial · 3 of 5 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (57 of 93 engines answered): completed
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading · not run: did not fully complete
- page capture · not available: did not fully complete
- domain records · not run: did not fully complete
- web research: completed
Unverified .onion site: technical checks show only one isolated suspicious flag, but its purpose could not be confirmed
This address is a valid-format Tor hidden service (.onion), so its operator is anonymous by design. Of 93 antivirus engines, one (LevelBlue) marked the URL as suspicious and the rest did not flag it. The browser threat feed gave no warning. The evidence does not show what the site offers or who runs it. A clean technical result is not proof of safety, so we rate it Moderate Risk.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 55/100
Moderate Risk covers scores 45–69. 1 finding pulled the score down; 1 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- Moderate1 antivirus result marked the URL as suspicious.-32 pts
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe browser threat feed returned no threat warning.
Points come from the saved evidence ledger: it lowered the score from 87 to 55 and split those 32 points between the findings that show points; the others carry no points in the ledger. Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
This address is a valid-format Tor hidden service (.onion), so its operator is anonymous by design. Of 93 antivirus engines, one (LevelBlue) marked the URL as suspicious and the rest did not flag it. The browser threat feed gave no warning. The evidence does not show what the site offers or who runs it. A clean technical result is not proof of safety, so we rate it Moderate Risk.
What the security checks found
One antivirus engine out of 93 rated the URL suspicious, and no other vendor agreed. A single detection like this is weak evidence on its own, but it is not nothing. The browser threat feed returned no threat warning.
Who runs it and what it does is unknown
Our research confirmed only that this is a standard v3 .onion address, which is built from a cryptographic key. That says nothing about the operator's identity or honesty. We found no evidence of the site's offer, business, or customer experience, so the risk to anyone paying or sharing data with it remains unverified.
Why the score is 55
1 antivirus result marked the URL as suspicious. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
1/ 93
detectionsFresh result
1 engine flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 0
- Suspicious
- 1
- Total
- 93
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| LevelBlueSuspicious | suspicious |
All 93 engine results
- LevelBlue - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Unrated
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Unrated
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekerproxy avoidance
- Googlepornography
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
No page claim could be verified for fajddluzs6da4gfu7ijikmp65t2xgwunl5vgdq6xqncqvk3bimueaiad.onion because no usable page content or saved capture was available.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
1 external finding was saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
2 of the 5 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
Web research findings
Independent findings for fajddluzs6da4gfu7ijikmp65t2xgwunl5vgdq6xqncqvk3bimueaiad.onion, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for fajddluzs6da4gfu7ijikmp65t2xgwunl5vgdq6xqncqvk3bimueaiad.onion. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruscomplete
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentnot run
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidenceunavailable
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
1 antivirus result marked the URL as suspicious.
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 1 of 93 engines flagged | Completed | Adverse | fresh · analysed Oct 19, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | The saved page capture was not reliable enough to use | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Independent research | 1 independent finding was saved | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 19, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result1 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionCompletedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessfresh · analysed Oct 19, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 19, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionUnavailableFindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- ResultThe saved page capture was not reliable enough to use
- CompletionUnavailableFindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Independent research
- Result1 independent finding was saved
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 19, 2026
06 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is fajddluzs6da4gfu7ijikmp65t2xgwunl5vgdq6xqncqvk3bimueaiad.onion a scam or is it safe?
Is fajddluzs6da4gfu7ijikmp65t2xgwunl5vgdq6xqncqvk3bimueaiad.onion safe to use?
Has fajddluzs6da4gfu7ijikmp65t2xgwunl5vgdq6xqncqvk3bimueaiad.onion been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is fajddluzs6da4gfu7ijikmp65t2xgwunl5vgdq6xqncqvk3bimueaiad.onion on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How often is the fajddluzs6da4gfu7ijikmp65t2xgwunl5vgdq6xqncqvk3bimueaiad.onion report updated?
07 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Unverified .onion site: technical checks show only one isolated suspicious flag, but its purpose could not be confirmed
The written conclusion remains part of the saved report.
This address is a valid-format Tor hidden service (.onion), so its operator is anonymous by design. Of 93 antivirus engines, one (LevelBlue) marked the URL as suspicious and the rest did not flag it. The browser threat feed gave no warning. The evidence does not show what the site offers or who runs it. A clean technical result is not proof of safety, so we rate it Moderate Risk.
08 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of fajddluzs6da4gfu7ijikmp65t2xgwunl5vgdq6xqncqvk3bimueaiad.onion?Verify and reply