MalwareTips

Is fan.reviews safe?

http://fan.reviews/

Low RiskStatus

Coveragestrong3 of 4 applicable core capabilities

Verdict

Fan.reviews operates as a review platform for adult content creators with paid premium features for creators.

The site functions as a user-generated review platform focused on creators from OnlyFans, Patreon, and Fansly. It offers paid premium subscriptions to creators that unlock additional moderation and visibility tools. No malware or technical threats were detected, and the domain has been registered for over six years.

The site presents low technical risk but operates in the adult content review space with paid creator tools. Users should exercise normal caution with any personal information shared on user-generated platforms.
Read full analysis
No saved capture is availableThe verdict remains based on the completed checks below.
No antivirus detections across 91 engines
Post Facebook
Calibrated safety spectrum

Where this site sits

  1. Dangerous1–20
  2. High Risk21–44
  3. Moderate Risk45–69
  4. Low Risk70–84
  5. Safe85–100

The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.

01 · Investigation Brief

Investigation Brief

The site functions as a user-generated review platform focused on creators from OnlyFans, Patreon, and Fansly. It offers paid premium subscriptions to creators that unlock additional moderation and visibility tools. No malware or technical threats were detected, and the domain has been registered for over six years.

Technical infrastructure shows no active threats

The hosting IP carries an abuse confidence score of 0/100 with no saved reports, indicating clean infrastructure.

The domain has been registered for 2191 days, providing substantial age-based legitimacy signals.

Creator-focused subscription model with premium features

The site offers Premium subscription plans for creators that include unlimited quick challenges, the ability to pin reviews, comment for context, and verify authentic fans.

The platform positions itself as a neutral third-party review service and explicitly states it will not mediate disputes between fans and creators.

Why the score is 78

The score combines saved deterministic evidence with the grounded analysis available for this report. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.

02 · Security Evidence

Security evidence

Collected signals and independent provider data for this URL.

Antivirus Engines

0/ 91

No detections

Saved result - stale

No detections across 91 engines

No antivirus engine in this saved scan raised an adverse result. This is one signal, not a guarantee.

Malicious
0
Suspicious
0
Total
91
All 91 engine results
  • 0xSI_f33d - unrated - Clean
  • Abusix - clean - Clean
  • Acronis - clean - Clean
  • ADMINUSLabs - clean - Clean
  • AILabs (MONITORAPP) - clean - Clean
  • AlienVault - clean - Clean
  • alphaMountain.ai - clean - Clean
  • AlphaSOC - unrated - Clean
  • Antiy-AVL - clean - Clean
  • ArcSight Threat Intelligence - unrated - Clean
  • AutoShun - unrated - Clean
  • Bfore.Ai PreCrime - unrated - Clean
  • BitDefender - clean - Clean
  • Bkav - unrated - Clean
  • BlockList - clean - Clean
  • Blueliv - clean - Clean
  • Certego - clean - Clean
  • ChainPatrol - unrated - Clean
  • Chong Lua Dao - clean - Clean
  • CINS Army - clean - Clean
  • Cluster25 - unrated - Clean
  • CRDF - clean - Clean
  • Criminal IP - clean - Clean
  • CSIS Security Group - unrated - Clean
  • CTX AI - clean - Clean
  • Cyan - unrated - Clean
  • Cyble - clean - Clean
  • CyRadar - clean - Clean
  • desenmascara.me - clean - Clean
  • DNS8 - unrated - Clean
  • Dr.Web - clean - Clean
  • EmergingThreats - clean - Clean
  • Emsisoft - clean - Clean
  • Ermes - unrated - Clean
  • ESET - clean - Clean
  • ESTsecurity - clean - Clean
  • Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - clean - Clean
  • Fortinet - clean - Clean
  • Fortra - unrated - Clean
  • G-Data - clean - Clean
  • GCP Abuse Intelligence - unrated - Clean
  • Google Safe Browsing - clean - Clean
  • GreenSnow - clean - Clean
  • GreyNoise - unrated - Clean
  • Gridinsoft - unrated - Clean
  • Guardpot - unrated - Clean
  • Heimdal Security - clean - Clean
  • Hunt.io Intelligence - unrated - Clean
  • IPsum - clean - Clean
  • Juniper Networks - clean - Clean
  • K7AntiVirus - unrated - Clean
  • Kaspersky - clean - Clean
  • LevelBlue - clean - Clean
  • Lionic - clean - Clean
  • Lumu - unrated - Clean
  • Malwared - clean - Clean
  • MalwarePatrol - clean - Clean
  • MalwareURL - unrated - Clean
  • Mimecast - unrated - Clean
  • Netcraft - unrated - Clean
  • OpenPhish - clean - Clean
  • PhishFort - unrated - Clean
  • Phishtank - clean - Clean
  • PREBYTES - clean - Clean
  • PrecisionSec - unrated - Clean
  • Quick Heal - clean - Clean
  • Quttera - clean - Clean
  • Rising - clean - Clean
  • SafeToOpen - unrated - Clean
  • Sangfor - clean - Clean
  • Sansec eComscan - unrated - Clean
  • Scantitan - clean - Clean
  • SCUMWARE.org - clean - Clean
  • Seclookup - clean - Clean
  • Snort IP sample list - unrated - Clean
  • SOCRadar - unrated - Clean
  • Sophos - clean - Clean
  • StopForumSpam - clean - Clean
  • Sucuri SiteCheck - clean - Clean
  • ThreatHive - clean - Clean
  • URLhaus - clean - Clean
  • URLQuery - unrated - Clean
  • Viettel Threat Intelligence - clean - Clean
  • VIPRE - unrated - Clean
  • ViriBack - clean - Clean
  • VX Vault - clean - Clean
  • Webroot - clean - Clean
  • Xcitium Verdict Cloud - unrated - Clean
  • Yandex Safebrowsing - clean - Clean
  • ZeroCERT - clean - Clean
  • ZeroFox - unrated - Clean

Security Scans

Browser Threat Feed
Not flagged on major threat lists

Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.

03 · Investigation Story

Investigation story

The behavior, reputation, and operator evidence that explains how this site may affect a visitor.

  1. What the site claims

    FanReviews | Review Onlyfans, Patreon, And Fansly Creators

  2. What we observed

    The page content was captured and checked alongside 91 antivirus results.

  3. What independent research found

    2 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.

  4. What remains unverified

    1 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.

What kind of site and risk is this?

Threat category

No threat category confirmed

Service and business model

Content

Subscription

Observed behavior

No disruptive browser behavior saved

Evidence behind this classification

  1. 01Domain registered for 2191 days
  2. 02Clean hosting IP with 0/100 abuse score
  3. 03Creator premium plans with specific feature unlocks

Web research findings

Independent findings for fan.reviews, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.

Business registration
No public record found
Could not match the site to a registered company — common for small sites.
Clone check
No clone detected
The completed research found no supported clone indicator.
Typosquat check
No look-alike match
The completed research found no supported look-alike match.
Web mentions
No scam reports found
The completed search returned no sourced scam reports or complaints.

No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for fan.reviews. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.

Reputation Sources

How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.

Google Safe Browsing
Not listedCheck ↗
VirusTotal
Not listedCheck ↗
AbuseIPDB
Not listedCheck ↗
Also verify:Spamhaus ↗DNSBL / SURBL ↗PhishTank ↗

04 · Domain & Infrastructure

Domain & infrastructure

Timeline · identity · encryption · redirects · hosting

The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.

Infrastructure map

How the saved page connected to the wider web.

  1. Domainfan.reviews
  2. Redirects tofan.reviews
  3. Hosted byCloudflare, Inc.
  4. Referencesgoogletagmanager.com · discord.gg

Domain Timeline

  1. Sep 9, 2020
    Domain registered

    First appeared in WHOIS records — 6.0 years old today.

  2. Sep 9, 2026
    Saved security review — Reviewed — inconclusive

    The completed checks from this saved scan are detailed above.

fan.reviews has operated for years with no threat signals in this review — a long, stable track record, though it is never a guarantee on its own.

Contact Verification

Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.

What We Found
No clear contact details on the page
Emails on site's domainNone
Phone numbersNone
Postal addressNot listed
Linked social profiles0
Signal Summary
Several contact red flags
  • No direct contact email found on the captured page.

Domain & Encryption

Domain History
Age6 years old
RegistrarGoDaddy.com, LLC
RegisteredSep 9, 2020
ExpiresSep 9, 2027
Owner privacyUnknown
Encryption Certificate
StatusValid
ProtocolTLSv1.3
IssuerGoogle Trust Services · WE1
ExpiresOct 20, 2026 (40d)
Self-signedNo
Hosting & Technology
HostingCloudflare, Inc.
Server locationUS
Web servercloudflare
Platform / CMSperformance-lab 3.9.0; plugins: webp-upl

Redirect Chain

Hops
1
Cross-domain
No
Lookalike
No
Punycode
No
  • 1301http://fan.reviews/
  • 2206https://fan.reviews/

Server Reputation

Abuse Intelligence
Confidence score0%
Reports on file0
ISPCloudflare, Inc.
Usage typeContent Delivery Network

Referenced Domains

Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.

googletagmanager.comdiscord.ggreddit.comx.cominstagram.complayer.vimeo.comtiktok.comtwitter.comallmylinks.comtipsnaps.comstatic.cloudflareinsights.com

05 · Evidence Ledger

Evidence ledger

Coverage, provenance, and source freshness remain separate so a missing check is never mistaken for a clean result.
  1. Antiviruspartial
  2. Browser threat feedcomplete
  3. Page contentcomplete
  4. Analysiscomplete
  5. Visual evidenceunavailable
Completed analysis

The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.

Technical threat

unknown

Malware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.

No confirmed evidence in this dimension.

Operator / customer risk

unknown

Complaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.

No confirmed evidence in this dimension.

Source coverage and freshness

Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.

Antivirus
Result0 of 91 engines flagged
CompletionLimited
FindingNo saved finding
Freshnessstale fallback · Sep 9, 2026
Browser protection
ResultNo browser threat-list match
CompletionCompleted
FindingNo adverse finding
FreshnessNot available
Page content
ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
CompletionCompleted
FindingNo adverse finding
FreshnessNot available
Visual evidence
ResultThe saved page capture was not reliable enough to use
CompletionUnavailable
FindingNo saved finding
FreshnessNot available
Independent research
Result2 independent findings were saved
CompletionCompleted
FindingNo adverse finding
FreshnessNot available

06 · Your Next Move

Your next move

Verify before you trust

We couldn't gather enough signal for a confident verdict — tread carefully.

  1. Find the company through independent channels

    Search for the business on LinkedIn, an official registry (Companies House, OpenCorporates, SEC EDGAR), or via the brand's known social channels. If you can't trace a real entity, that itself is a red flag.

  2. Never pay by crypto, gift card, or bank transfer

    If the site forces an irreversible payment method, stop. Cards and PayPal give you chargeback protection — irreversible methods don't.

  3. Ask the forum

    Post the URL in the MalwareTips Scam Reports forum — experienced members often recognise patterns immediately.

    Open

07 · Safety FAQ

Safety FAQ

Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

Is fan.reviews a scam or is it safe?
fan.reviews has a Safety Score of 78/100 (Low Risk). The saved checks found no material threat, but the report did not meet every requirement for the highest Safe tier. Use normal caution and independently verify the operator before irreversible payments or unusually sensitive actions.
Is fan.reviews safe to use?
fan.reviews has a Safety Score of 78/100 (Low Risk). Analysis coverage is strong at 83%. Normal caution; verify sensitive actions.
Has fan.reviews been flagged by antivirus engines?
No — all 91 antivirus and blocklist engines in our malware network currently report fan.reviews as clean. That's a good sign, though antivirus coverage is only one of the many signals we weigh, and brand-new scam sites can appear clean before vendors catch up.
Is fan.reviews on any phishing or malware blacklists?
No — fan.reviews is not currently on the major browser blocklist feeds that Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Edge rely on. Note that blocklists can lag behind brand-new scam domains, so "not listed" is reassuring but not a guarantee on its own.
How old is the fan.reviews domain?
fan.reviews is 6 years old, registered on September 9, 2020 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. A multi-year registration history is one of the stronger signals against a scam, though it's never a guarantee on its own — established domains can still be misused.
Does fan.reviews have a valid SSL certificate?
Yes — fan.reviews presents a valid TLSv1.3 certificate issued by Google Trust Services · WE1, valid for another 40 days. Important caveat: SSL only encrypts the connection between you and the site — it does not verify who runs it. Almost all scam sites now have valid SSL too, so a padlock alone never means "safe".
Where is fan.reviews hosted?
fan.reviews resolves to an IP operated by Cloudflare, Inc. in US (Content Delivery Network). Hosting location alone doesn't make a site good or bad — but hosting that doesn't match a brand's claimed country, or that sits on networks known for abuse, is one of the many signals we weigh alongside the verdict above.
How often is the fan.reviews report updated?
This report is a record of the scan run on September 9, 2026, and the verdict reflects that point in time. Scam sites change fast — they can go live, get flagged, or vanish within days — so if you believe something about fan.reviews has changed, MalwareTips staff can run a fresh scan that re-checks every signal from scratch and republishes an updated verdict.

08 · Final Verdict

Final verdict

The saved conclusion, decisive evidence, and practical action in one final view.
Verdict score
78/100
Low Risk

Fan.reviews operates as a review platform for adult content creators with paid premium features for creators.

Saved capturefan.reviewsCapture-safe
No saved screenshot was available for this report.
Conclusion

The site functions as a user-generated review platform focused on creators from OnlyFans, Patreon, and Fansly. It offers paid premium subscriptions to creators that unlock additional moderation and visibility tools. No malware or technical threats were detected, and the domain has been registered for over six years.

Recommended actionThe site presents low technical risk but operates in the adult content review space with paid creator tools. Users should exercise normal caution with any personal information shared on user-generated platforms.
Saved evidence only

Missing checks are never treated as a clean result.

Scan another URL
Continue toCommunity

09 · Community

Community

First-hand experiences add human context after the scanner has reached its conclusion.
Category and recency

More reports in this category

Recent Low Risk reports are prioritized by broad site category when that data is available. This is not a fingerprint match and does not imply identical risk.

Browse all reports
Low Risksafety73
glbiochem.co
Sep 9, 2026
Read the review
Low Risksafety72
r34video.com
Sep 9, 2026
Read the review
Low Risksafety82
secureapps.myencryptedemail.com
Sep 9, 2026
Read the review
Low Risksafety78
boggbag.com
Sep 9, 2026
Read the review
Low Risksafety82
ellicere.com
Sep 9, 2026
Read the review
Low Risksafety72
38.147.160.49
Sep 9, 2026
Read the review
Low Risksafety82
fast-poll.com
Sep 9, 2026
Read the review
Low Risksafety78
merexa.app
Sep 9, 2026
Read the review
Low Risksafety78
seemabconsultantsltd.co.uk
Sep 9, 2026
Read the review
Low Risksafety75
lunaland.ink
Sep 9, 2026
Read the review
Low Risksafety72
automazioniitalia.com
Sep 9, 2026
Read the review
Low Risksafety82
jeddahfhl.com
Sep 9, 2026
Read the review

This automated risk assessment reflects the evidence available at scan time. It is informational, not legal advice. Always use your own judgement before sharing personal information or money online.