Is misruleoflaw.com safe?
http://misruleoflaw.com/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: strong · 5 of 6 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (60 of 92 engines answered) · saved result: did not fully complete
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading: completed
- page capture: completed
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
Misrule of Law is a long-running personal legal-commentary blog whose only real risk signals are a stale antivirus record and a generic automated trust score.
The site presents itself as "MISRULE OF LAW — A Chronicle of Legal & Judicial Mischief," a blog of legal and judicial commentary written by Mark Pulliam, a lawyer and writer in east Tennessee who says he practised in California for 30 years. Its only commercial call to action is a same-site email sign-up for updates, described on the page as a direct communication rather than a mass mailing list. The domain has been registered since 2014, current Safe Browsing and TLS checks are clean, and there is no affiliate funnel, checkout, or cross-domain order path. Two adverse items remain: a saved antivirus observation in which six engine families returned an adverse result, and an automated trust aggregator that labels the site a likely scam. Neither is tied to any observed deceptive mechanism on the page, so the score sits in the low-risk band rather than Safe.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 72/100
Low Risk covers scores 70–84. 2 findings pulled the score down; 3 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- Strong6 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
- ModerateOne public warning in public web research: "In summary, misruleoflaw.com has a very low trust score which indicates that there is a strong likelyhood the website is a scam."
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe site names its author, Mark Pulliam, a lawyer and writer in east Tennessee, rather than hiding behind an anonymous storefront.
- SupportsThe registrable domain is 4625 days old and WHOIS records a 2014-02-25 registration date, consistent with a long-lived publication.
- SupportsThe browser threat feed returned no threat warning and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection.
No points per finding are stored for this report: our analysis weighed all findings together to set the score. Each finding shows its saved severity instead (Decisive, Strong, Moderate or Minor). Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
The site presents itself as "MISRULE OF LAW — A Chronicle of Legal & Judicial Mischief," a blog of legal and judicial commentary written by Mark Pulliam, a lawyer and writer in east Tennessee who says he practised in California for 30 years. Its only commercial call to action is a same-site email sign-up for updates, described on the page as a direct communication rather than a mass mailing list. The domain has been registered since 2014, current Safe Browsing and TLS checks are clean, and there is no affiliate funnel, checkout, or cross-domain order path. Two adverse items remain: a saved antivirus observation in which six engine families returned an adverse result, and an automated trust aggregator that labels the site a likely scam. Neither is tied to any observed deceptive mechanism on the page, so the score sits in the low-risk band rather than Safe.
A personal legal blog, not a storefront
The captured page identifies the site as "MISRULE OF LAW" with the tagline "A Chronicle of Legal & Judicial Mischief," and the author block names Mark Pulliam, a lawyer and writer living in east Tennessee, a University of Texas School of Law graduate who practised in California for 30 years. That is a named, self-described author rather than an anonymous storefront.
The only commercial call to action found is a same-site email sign-up: "SIGN UP FOR UPDATES," "Subscribe," and "We promise, we don't spam," with the form text stating "This is not a mass mailing list. It is a direct communication from me to you. No spamming!" There is no cart, no checkout, no affiliate link, and no cross-domain order path in the captured evidence.
The outbound links on the page point to other commentary publications — Liberty Law Blog, City Journal, Overlawyered, Originalism Blog, Power Line, Instapundit and Crime and Consequences — and none of them carry a commercial or monetisation intent in the evidence. They read as a blogroll, not a funnel.
Stale detections and a generic trust score, with no observed mechanism
A saved antivirus observation records that six independent engine families returned an adverse result, and the record itself notes it comes from a saved observation rather than a fresh submission, so the timing should be confirmed. Current checks are clean: the browser threat feed returned no threat warning and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection.
An automated trust aggregator published a very low trust score and stated there is a strong likelihood the website is a scam. That is an automated metric rather than a documented complaint, and nothing in the captured page content — no fake checkout, no credential form, no download, no redirect chain — matches a scam mechanism. It is adverse context, not proof of a specific fraud.
The domain's registration date is recorded as 2014-02-25, and the registrable domain is 4625 days old, which is consistent with a long-lived personal publication rather than a throwaway scam domain. One small gap: no direct contact email was found on the captured page, which limits how easily a reader could verify the author directly.
Why the score is 72
The saved checks found no material threat, but the evidence was not strong enough for the highest Safe tier. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
6/ 92
detectionsSaved analysis from October 6, 2026 - stale
6 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 6
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 92
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| AILabs (MONITORAPP)Malicious | malicious |
| alphaMountain.aiMalicious | malicious |
| Chong Lua DaoMalicious | malicious |
| Forcepoint ThreatSeekerMalicious | phishing |
| GridinsoftMalicious | phishing |
| SeclookupMalicious | malicious |
All 92 engine results
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Malicious
- alphaMountain.ai - Malicious
- Chong Lua Dao - Malicious
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - phishing - Malicious
- Gridinsoft - phishing - Malicious
- Seclookup - Malicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- alphaMountain.aiMalicious
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekerphishing and other frauds
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
MISRULE OF LAW A Chronicle of Legal & Judicial Mischief
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
MISRULE OF LAW A Chronicle of Legal & Judicial Mischief
What the page says about itself
What the site says about itself, quoted from the pages we read. The site wrote these words; they are not our findings.
- Page title
Misrule of Law | Misrule of Law | A Chronicle of Legal & Judicial Mischief
Pages we read
- Main page/Read
- About page/about/Read
- Contact page/contact/Read
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Misrule of Law | Misrule of Law | A Chronicle of Legal & Judicial Mischief
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 60 antivirus results.
What independent research found
2 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
1 of the 6 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Content
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01The site names its author, Mark Pulliam, a lawyer and writer in east Tennessee, rather than hiding behind an anonymous storefront.
- 02The registrable domain is 4625 days old and WHOIS records a 2014-02-25 registration date, consistent with a long-lived publication.
- 03The browser threat feed returned no threat warning and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection.
Web research findings
Independent findings for misruleoflaw.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- Scamadviseropen
"In summary, misruleoflaw.com has a very low trust score which indicates that there is a strong likelyhood the website is a scam."
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainmisruleoflaw.com
- Redirects tomisruleoflaw.com
- Hosted byInMotion Hosting, Inc.
- Referencesfonts.googleapis.com · googletagmanager.com
Domain Timeline
- Feb 25, 2014Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 12 years old when this review was saved.
- Oct 26, 2026Saved security review — Rated Low Risk
This saved scan found no material threat, but the evidence was not strong enough for the highest Safe tier.
misruleoflaw.com has operated for years and this review found no material threat — a long track record, though it is never a guarantee on its own.
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
- No direct contact email found on the captured page.
Domain & Encryption
Certificate issued for misruleoflaw.com.
Analytics and ads
- Google Tag Manager
Scripts, fonts and CDNs
- Google Fonts
Payment providers the page loads
None seen among the outside domains we saved.
Read from the first 20 outside domains the page loads and the shop platform it uses; the web server and platform rows are under Hosting & Technology. A payment script on the page does not prove the shop accepts that method at checkout, or that you are protected.
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://misruleoflaw.com/
- 2200https://misruleoflaw.com/
Server Reputation
Referenced Domains
Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentcomplete
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
6 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
One public warning in public web research: "In summary, misruleoflaw.com has a very low trust score which indicates that there is a strong likelyhood the website is a scam."
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 6 of 92 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · analysed Oct 6, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 26, 2026 |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 26, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 26, 2026 |
| Independent research | 2 independent findings were saved | Completed | Adverse | this scan · Oct 26, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result6 of 92 engines flagged
- CompletionLimitedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Oct 6, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 26, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 26, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 26, 2026
- Independent research
- Result2 independent findings were saved
- CompletionCompletedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 26, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is misruleoflaw.com a scam or is it safe?
Is misruleoflaw.com safe to use?
Has misruleoflaw.com been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is misruleoflaw.com on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the misruleoflaw.com domain?
Does misruleoflaw.com have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is misruleoflaw.com hosted?
How often is the misruleoflaw.com report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Misrule of Law is a long-running personal legal-commentary blog whose only real risk signals are a stale antivirus record and a generic automated trust score.
The site presents itself as "MISRULE OF LAW — A Chronicle of Legal & Judicial Mischief," a blog of legal and judicial commentary written by Mark Pulliam, a lawyer and writer in east Tennessee who says he practised in California for 30 years. Its only commercial call to action is a same-site email sign-up for updates, described on the page as a direct communication rather than a mass mailing list. The domain has been registered since 2014, current Safe Browsing and TLS checks are clean, and there is no affiliate funnel, checkout, or cross-domain order path. Two adverse items remain: a saved antivirus observation in which six engine families returned an adverse result, and an automated trust aggregator that labels the site a likely scam. Neither is tied to any observed deceptive mechanism on the page, so the score sits in the low-risk band rather than Safe.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of misruleoflaw.com?Verify and reply