Is muhammedfirooz77-stack.github.io safe?
http://muhammedfirooz77-stack.github.io/
muhammedfirooz77-stack.github.io returns GitHub 404 with 6 VirusTotal phishing flags
The GitHub Pages subdomain displays only the standard 404 error page with no site content or active functionality. VirusTotal reports 6 malicious detections labeling it phishing, while Google Safe Browsing shows no flag and the IP belongs to GitHub's CDN.
Read the full analysisLoading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
The GitHub Pages subdomain displays only the standard 404 error page with no site content or active functionality. VirusTotal reports 6 malicious detections labeling it phishing, while Google Safe Browsing shows no flag and the IP belongs to GitHub's CDN.
Site appearance and behavior
Visiting the URL loads GitHub's official 404 page stating there is no Pages site here, with links to documentation. No content, redirects, downloads, or interactive elements are present.
Decisive evidence from signals
VirusTotal analysis shows 6 malicious detections out of 92 engines, specifically flagged as phishing by Emsisoft, ESET, Fortinet, Netcraft, Sophos, and Webroot. The hosting IP 185.199.108.153 carries an abuse confidence score of 46 with 59 reports, though this is GitHub infrastructure shared across many users.
Page content fetch confirms HTTP 404 status with zero body text or metadata. No TLS validation applies, Safe Browsing is clean, and no observed behaviors like popups or credential harvesting occur.
User impact and recommendation
The page itself poses no immediate technical threat and is harmless to load. Domain-level reputation flags create moderate risk for potential past or future misuse in phishing campaigns. Avoid entering credentials or following links from this subdomain; treat similar GitHub Pages URLs with caution until reputation clears.
Why the score is 68
6 independent antivirus familyies reported an adverse result. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
Fresh result
6 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 6
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 92
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| EmsisoftMalicious | phishing |
| ESETMalicious | phishing |
| FortinetMalicious | phishing |
| NetcraftMalicious | malicious |
| SophosMalicious | phishing |
| WebrootMalicious | malicious |
All 92 engine results
- Emsisoft - phishing - Malicious
- ESET - phishing - Malicious
- Fortinet - phishing - Malicious
- Netcraft - malicious - Malicious
- Sophos - phishing - Malicious
- Webroot - malicious - Malicious
- 0xSI_f33d - unrated - Clean
- Abusix - clean - Clean
- Acronis - clean - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - clean - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - clean - Clean
- AlienVault - clean - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - unrated - Clean
- AlphaSOC - unrated - Clean
- Antiy-AVL - clean - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- AutoShun - unrated - Clean
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - unrated - Clean
- BitDefender - clean - Clean
- Bkav - unrated - Clean
- BlockList - clean - Clean
- Blueliv - clean - Clean
- Certego - clean - Clean
- ChainPatrol - clean - Clean
- Chong Lua Dao - unrated - Clean
- CINS Army - clean - Clean
- Cluster25 - unrated - Clean
- CRDF - clean - Clean
- Criminal IP - clean - Clean
- CSIS Security Group - unrated - Clean
- CTX AI - clean - Clean
- Cyan - unrated - Clean
- Cyble - clean - Clean
- CyRadar - clean - Clean
- desenmascara.me - clean - Clean
- DNS8 - unrated - Clean
- Dr.Web - clean - Clean
- EmergingThreats - clean - Clean
- Ermes - unrated - Clean
- ESTsecurity - clean - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - clean - Clean
- Fortra - unrated - Clean
- G-Data - clean - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- Google Safe Browsing - clean - Clean
- GreenSnow - clean - Clean
- GreyNoise - unrated - Clean
- Gridinsoft - unrated - Clean
- Guardpot - unrated - Clean
- Heimdal Security - clean - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- IPsum - clean - Clean
- Juniper Networks - clean - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - unrated - Clean
- Kaspersky - clean - Clean
- LevelBlue - clean - Clean
- Lionic - clean - Clean
- Lumu - unrated - Clean
- Malwared - clean - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - clean - Clean
- MalwareURL - unrated - Clean
- Mimecast - unrated - Clean
- OpenPhish - clean - Clean
- PhishFort - unrated - Clean
- Phishing Database - clean - Clean
- Phishtank - clean - Clean
- PREBYTES - clean - Clean
- PrecisionSec - unrated - Clean
- Quick Heal - clean - Clean
- Quttera - clean - Clean
- Rising - clean - Clean
- SafeToOpen - unrated - Clean
- Sangfor - clean - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - unrated - Clean
- Scantitan - clean - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - clean - Clean
- Seclookup - clean - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - unrated - Clean
- SOCRadar - unrated - Clean
- StopForumSpam - clean - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - clean - Clean
- ThreatHive - clean - Clean
- URLhaus - clean - Clean
- URLQuery - unrated - Clean
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - clean - Clean
- VIPRE - unrated - Clean
- ViriBack - clean - Clean
- VX Vault - clean - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - clean - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - clean - Clean
- ZeroCERT - clean - Clean
- ZeroFox - unrated - Clean
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Captured during this scan in a safe sandbox. Opening this report does not revisit the site. Marker positions are approximate. See full visual analysis →
No scam visual patterns were identified
Standard GitHub 404 error page with no site content
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Standard GitHub 404 error page with no site content
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
- 1
What the site claims
The page presents itself as a service operating on muhammedfirooz77-stack.github.io.
- 2
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
- 3
What independent research found
No complete independent-research result was available in this saved report.
- 4
What remains unverified
3 of the five core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
Phishing & Impersonation
Service and business model
Unknown
Unknown
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 016 independent antivirus familyies reported an adverse result.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
Domain & Encryption
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
Some evidence sources did not complete, and those gaps remain visible below.
Technical threat
Malware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
Additional evidence review
Operator / customer risk
Complaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 6 of 92 engines flagged | Completed | Adverse | fresh · Jul 30, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Limited | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Independent research | Independent research was not available for this report | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
- Page content
- Result: Page content was not available for semantic review
- Limited
- No saved finding
- Visual evidence
- Result: 1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- Completed
- No adverse finding
- Independent research
- Result: Independent research was not available for this report
- Unavailable
- No saved finding
07 · Community
Community
08 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

0 community contributions
Share what happened, what the site requested, and what others should watch for.
Community reviews never change the scanner verdict.