Is natalydate.com safe?
http://natalydate.com/
Coveragestrong3 of 4 applicable core capabilities
Nataly Date charges credits for a contact exchange that reviewers say never arrives
Nataly Date is a paid dating site operated by Crystal Universal Transit LLP in London, using a credit system in which members spend 100 Credits for an approved request for another member's personal contact information, and only after completing 200 'Steps' of interaction. Security scans are clean, but independent review evidence describes the central paid promise failing: an independent review platform's reviewer says women encourage 15 paid letters before declining to exchange details, and other review sites question whether profiles are real and note that registration emails are not verified. A binding arbitration clause removes court access for disputes. The combination of a pay-to-unlock-contact model and adverse user reports puts this in the High Risk band.
Be the first to review natalydate.com
Lost money to natalydate.com? Warn others
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
Nataly Date is a paid dating site operated by Crystal Universal Transit LLP in London, using a credit system in which members spend 100 Credits for an approved request for another member's personal contact information, and only after completing 200 'Steps' of interaction. Security scans are clean, but independent review evidence describes the central paid promise failing: an independent review platform's reviewer says women encourage 15 paid letters before declining to exchange details, and other review sites question whether profiles are real and note that registration emails are not verified. A binding arbitration clause removes court access for disputes. The combination of a pay-to-unlock-contact model and adverse user reports puts this in the High Risk band.
The paid promise: credits for contact details
The site's own terms describe a paywall placed directly in front of the goal most dating-site visitors have: exchanging contact information. A request costs 100 Credits per approved request, and you only become eligible to make that request after completing 200 'Steps' through direct interaction with the other member. That means money and time are spent before the contact exchange even becomes possible.
Independent review evidence describes what happens at the end of that paid path. An independent review platform's reviewer writes that women 'lure you into releasing their contact details after 15 paid letters,' and that after letter 14 or 15 communication deteriorates, with the other party saying they do not want to exchange details because they do not have feelings. That is an adverse customer report about the paid outcome, not a directory listing.
Doubts about whether the profiles are real people
A review on Doves of Love states the reviewer 'would not call these profiles real with absolute confidence,' raising concerns about authenticity. This is review commentary rather than a verified finding, but it points in the same direction as the paid-contact complaint.
A separate review on Loving.is notes that users' emails for registration are not verified, which it says makes it possible that fraudulent profiles will appear on the site. Unverified sign-ups do not by themselves prove that any profile is fake, but they mean the platform has no strong barrier preventing fabricated accounts from being created.
Disputes are pushed into binding arbitration
The Terms of Use state that the user and the company agree to arbitration 'instead of the right to a trial before a judge or jury in a public court,' and that disputes 'shall be exclusively resolved by binding arbitration.' For a service built around prepaid credits, that clause makes it harder for a dissatisfied paying member to pursue a claim through ordinary courts.
The same terms are a legally binding distance agreement between the user and Crystal Universal Transit LLP at a London address, so the operator identity is disclosed. Disclosed ownership does not offset the paid-contact complaints, but it is worth noting for completeness.
Why the score is 38
Contact information costs 100 Credits per approved request and is gated behind 200 'Steps' of interaction, placing payment ahead of the site's core promise. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
0/ 78
No detectionsSaved analysis from August 18, 2020 - stale
No detections across 71 engines that rated this URL
No antivirus engine that answered raised an adverse result; 7 had no rating for this URL. This is one signal, not a guarantee.
- Malicious
- 0
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 78
All 78 engine results
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- Artists Against 419 - Clean
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Avira - Clean
- BADWARE.INFO - Clean
- Baidu-International - Clean
- BitDefender - Clean
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- CLEAN MX - Clean
- Comodo Valkyrie Verdict - Unrated
- CRDF - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- CyberCrime - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- Cyren - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Clean
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- EonScope - Clean
- ESET - Clean
- Feodo Tracker - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- FraudScore - Clean
- G-Data - Clean
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- IPsum - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Clean
- Kaspersky - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- MalSilo - Clean
- Malware Domain Blocklist - Clean
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwareDomainList - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- malwares.com URL checker - Clean
- Netcraft - Clean
- NotMining - Unrated
- Nucleon - Clean
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- Sangfor - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- SecureBrain - Clean
- securolytics - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Clean
- Sophos - Clean
- Spam404 - Clean
- Spamhaus - Clean
- StopBadware - Unrated
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Tencent - Clean
- ThreatHive - Clean
- Threatsourcing - Clean
- Trustwave - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- Virusdie External Site Scan - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Web Security Guard - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- zvelo - Clean
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
Meet Slavic Charm
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Meet Slavic Charm
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Online Single Women Dating Site | Nataly Date
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 71 antivirus results.
What independent research found
3 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
1 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
Subscription Trap
Service and business model
Content
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01Contact information costs 100 Credits per approved request and is gated behind 200 'Steps' of interaction, placing payment ahead of the site's core promise.
- 022 independent sources carry complaints or warnings about this site, including: "Women lure you into releasing their contact details after 15 paid letters. But after letter 14/15, communication deteriorates and they say: no, don't want to…"
- 03Reviewers question whether profiles are real and note that registration emails are not verified, which allows fabricated profiles in principle.
Web research findings
Independent findings for natalydate.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- Trustpilotopen
"Women lure you into releasing their contact details after 15 paid letters. But after letter 14/15, communication deteriorates and they say: no, don't want to exchange the details because they dont have feelings."
- Loving.isopen
"Users' emails for registration are not verified, so it is possible that fraudulent profiles will appear on the site."
- Doves of Loveopen
"I would not call these profiles “real” with absolute confidence."
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainnatalydate.com
- Redirects tonatalydate.com
- Hosted byAmazon.com, Inc.
- Referencesconnect.facebook.net · accounts.google.com
Domain Timeline
- Jan 12, 2016Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 10 years old when this review was saved.
- Oct 24, 2026Saved security review — Rated High Risk
The completed checks from this saved scan are detailed above.
natalydate.com is an established domain now carrying threat signals. An older domain that starts tripping security checks is a classic pattern for an asset that was sold, repurposed, or compromised — the age alone is not reassurance.
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
- Contact email on the site's own domain (support@natalydate.com).
Domain & Encryption
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://natalydate.com/
- 2200https://natalydate.com/
Server Reputation
Referenced Domains
Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentcomplete
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
unknownMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
Contact information costs 100 Credits per approved request and is gated behind 200 'Steps' of interaction, placing payment ahead of the site's core promise. · 2 independent sources carry complaints or warnings about this site, including: "Women lure you into releasing their contact details after 15 paid letters. But after letter 14/15, communication deteriorates and they say: no, don't want to…"
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 0 of 78 engines flagged | Limited | No saved finding | stale fallback · analysed Aug 18, 2020 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 24, 2026 |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 24, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 24, 2026 |
| Independent research | 3 independent findings were saved | Completed | Adverse | this scan · Oct 24, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result0 of 78 engines flagged
- CompletionLimited
- FindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Aug 18, 2020
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 24, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 24, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 24, 2026
- Independent research
- Result3 independent findings were saved
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 24, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is natalydate.com a scam or a legit online store?
Is natalydate.com safe to use?
What should I do if I already gave my details to natalydate.com?
Can I get my money back from natalydate.com?
I ordered from natalydate.com but nothing arrived — is it a fake shop?
How do I report natalydate.com?
Why does natalydate.com look legitimate if it's a scam?
Has natalydate.com been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is natalydate.com on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the natalydate.com domain?
Does natalydate.com have a valid SSL certificate?
How often is the natalydate.com report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Nataly Date charges credits for a contact exchange that reviewers say never arrives
Nataly Date is a paid dating site operated by Crystal Universal Transit LLP in London, using a credit system in which members spend 100 Credits for an approved request for another member's personal contact information, and only after completing 200 'Steps' of interaction. Security scans are clean, but independent review evidence describes the central paid promise failing: an independent review platform's reviewer says women encourage 15 paid letters before declining to exchange details, and other review sites question whether profiles are real and note that registration emails are not verified. A binding arbitration clause removes court access for disputes. The combination of a pay-to-unlock-contact model and adverse user reports puts this in the High Risk band.
09 · Community