Is neural.dq.fct.unl.pt safe?
http://neural.dq.fct.unl.pt/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: strong · 3 of 4 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (59 of 64 engines answered) · saved result: did not fully complete
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading: completed
- page capture: completed
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
Academic NMR research portal with no commercial funnel or detected threats
This is a non-commercial academic resource hosted on university infrastructure, presenting the SPINUS tool for NMR spectroscopy prediction. Technical checks are clean: no Safe Browsing warning, a valid encrypted connection, and a hosting IP with no abuse reports. The only adverse note is that the captured page did not show a direct contact email, which is a minor transparency gap rather than a risk mechanism. No commercial CTAs, affiliate links, or cross-domain order paths were found, so the score reflects a safe, low-risk academic site.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 88/100
Safe covers scores 85–100. 1 finding pulled the score down; 5 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- MinorNo direct contact email found on the captured page.
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe browser threat feed returned no threat warning.
- SupportsThe saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection.
- SupportsThe page presents the SPINUS tool for NMR spectroscopy prediction, consistent with an academic research portal.
- SupportsThe hosting IP has an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across 0 saved reports.
- SupportsThe Internet Archive first captured the site's home page on January 27, 1998, with yearly captures unbroken from 2007 to 2026.
No points per finding are stored for this report: our analysis weighed all findings together to set the score. Each finding shows its saved severity instead (Decisive, Strong, Moderate or Minor). Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
This is a non-commercial academic resource hosted on university infrastructure, presenting the SPINUS tool for NMR spectroscopy prediction. Technical checks are clean: no Safe Browsing warning, a valid encrypted connection, and a hosting IP with no abuse reports. The only adverse note is that the captured page did not show a direct contact email, which is a minor transparency gap rather than a risk mechanism. No commercial CTAs, affiliate links, or cross-domain order paths were found, so the score reflects a safe, low-risk academic site.
Clean technical checks and long-standing archive presence
The browser threat feed returned no threat warning for this host, and the saved TLS check confirmed a valid encrypted connection. The hosting IP carries an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across zero saved reports, meaning no abuse activity has been recorded against it.
The Internet Archive first captured the site's home page on January 27, 1998, with yearly captures unbroken from 2007 to 2026. This dates when the site was archived, not when the domain was registered, but it does show a long-standing public presence consistent with an academic project.
Minor transparency gap but no commercial risk
The captured page did not show a direct contact email. This is a minor transparency gap for an academic tool, but it is not a risk mechanism and does not indicate deception. The page content clearly identifies the SPINUS (Structure-based Predictions In NUclear magnetic resonance Spectroscopy) tool, matching the stated academic purpose.
No commercial CTAs, affiliate relationships, or cross-domain order paths were present in the evidence. The site operates as a free academic resource with no monetization funnel, so there is no commercial mechanism to evaluate for customer harm.
Why the score is 88
The saved checks and analysis found no material threat. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
0/ 64
No detectionsSaved analysis from May 13, 2017 - stale
No detections across 59 engines that rated this URL
No antivirus engine that answered raised an adverse result; 5 had no rating for this URL. This is one signal, not a guarantee.
- Malicious
- 0
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 64
All 64 engine results
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Avira - Clean
- Baidu-International - Clean
- BitDefender - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- C-SIRT - Clean
- Certly - Clean
- CLEAN MX - Clean
- Comodo Site Inspector - Clean
- CyberCrime - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- Dr.Web - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- ESET - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- FraudScore - Clean
- FraudSense - Clean
- G-Data - Clean
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Clean
- Kaspersky - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Malc0de Database - Clean
- Malekal - Clean
- Malware Domain Blocklist - Clean
- Malwarebytes hpHosts - Clean
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwareDomainList - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- malwares.com URL checker - Clean
- Netcraft - Unrated
- Nucleon - Clean
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Opera - Clean
- ParetoLogic - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- SecureBrain - Clean
- securolytics - Clean
- Sophos - Unrated
- Spam404 - Clean
- StopBadware - Unrated
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Tencent - Clean
- ThreatHive - Clean
- Trustwave - Clean
- URLQuery - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Web Security Guard - Clean
- Websense ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Webutation - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZCloudsec - Clean
- ZDB Zeus - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- Zerofox - Clean
- ZeusTracker - Clean
- zvelo - Clean
How security vendors categorise this site
- BitDefendereducation
- Websense ThreatSeekereducational institutions
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
SPINUS (Structure-based Predictions In NUclear magnetic resonance Spectroscopy)
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
SPINUS (Structure-based Predictions In NUclear magnetic resonance Spectroscopy)
What the page says about itself
What the site says about itself, quoted from the pages we read. The site wrote these words; they are not our findings.
- Page title
Neural
Pages we read
- Main page/Read
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Neural
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 59 antivirus results.
What independent research found
The search completed without a material external warning or corroborating report.
What remains unverified
1 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Content
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01The browser threat feed returned no threat warning.
- 02The saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection.
- 03The hosting IP has an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across 0 saved reports.
Web research findings
Independent findings for neural.dq.fct.unl.pt, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for neural.dq.fct.unl.pt. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainneural.dq.fct.unl.pt
- Redirects toneural.dq.fct.unl.pt
- Hosted byFaculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa
- Referencesdq.fct.unl.pt
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
- No direct contact email found on the captured page.
Domain & Encryption
Certificate issued for neural.dq.fct.unl.pt.
Payment providers the page loads
None seen among the outside domains we saved.
Read from the first 20 outside domains the page loads and the shop platform it uses; the web server and platform rows are under Hosting & Technology. A payment script on the page does not prove the shop accepts that method at checkout, or that you are protected.
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://neural.dq.fct.unl.pt/
- 2206https://neural.dq.fct.unl.pt/
Server Reputation
Referenced Domains
Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentcomplete
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
unknownMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No direct contact email found on the captured page.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 0 of 64 engines flagged | Limited | No saved finding | stale fallback · analysed May 13, 2017 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 23, 2026 |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 23, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 23, 2026 |
| Independent research | The search completed without a material external finding | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 23, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result0 of 64 engines flagged
- CompletionLimitedFindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed May 13, 2017
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 23, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 23, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 23, 2026
- Independent research
- ResultThe search completed without a material external finding
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 23, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is neural.dq.fct.unl.pt legit and safe?
Is neural.dq.fct.unl.pt safe to use?
Could a legitimate site like neural.dq.fct.unl.pt still be used in a scam?
Has neural.dq.fct.unl.pt been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is neural.dq.fct.unl.pt on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the neural.dq.fct.unl.pt domain?
Does neural.dq.fct.unl.pt have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is neural.dq.fct.unl.pt hosted?
How often is the neural.dq.fct.unl.pt report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Academic NMR research portal with no commercial funnel or detected threats
This is a non-commercial academic resource hosted on university infrastructure, presenting the SPINUS tool for NMR spectroscopy prediction. Technical checks are clean: no Safe Browsing warning, a valid encrypted connection, and a hosting IP with no abuse reports. The only adverse note is that the captured page did not show a direct contact email, which is a minor transparency gap rather than a risk mechanism. No commercial CTAs, affiliate links, or cross-domain order paths were found, so the score reflects a safe, low-risk academic site.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of neural.dq.fct.unl.pt?Verify and reply