Is onehack.st safe?
http://onehack.st/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: strong · 5 of 6 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (58 of 91 engines answered) · saved result: did not fully complete
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading: completed
- page capture: completed
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
OneHack is a young community forum sharing tutorials and tools, and one saved antivirus check flagged it as malicious.
OneHack (onehack.st) presents itself as a user-generated community forum for sharing tutorials, tools and resources. The registrable domain is only 292 days old, and the only saved antivirus observation reports that one independent engine flagged the domain as malicious, though that result is stale. The browser threat feed returned no warning and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection, so the site is not currently blocked and its transport is encrypted. The forum links out to accounts on X and Telegram, which are normal community channels rather than a payment flow, and there is no affiliate or checkout path in the evidence. Because one adverse antivirus detection exists and the domain is young with limited independent verification, the site sits at Moderate Risk rather than Safe or Low Risk.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 65/100
Moderate Risk covers scores 45–69. 2 findings pulled the score down; 3 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- Strong1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
- MinorNo direct contact email was found on the captured page.
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe browser threat feed returned no threat warning for the domain.
- SupportsThe saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection.
- SupportsThe hosting IP has an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across zero saved reports.
No points per finding are stored for this report: our analysis weighed all findings together to set the score. Each finding shows its saved severity instead (Decisive, Strong, Moderate or Minor). Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
OneHack (onehack.st) presents itself as a user-generated community forum for sharing tutorials, tools and resources. The registrable domain is only 292 days old, and the only saved antivirus observation reports that one independent engine flagged the domain as malicious, though that result is stale. The browser threat feed returned no warning and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection, so the site is not currently blocked and its transport is encrypted. The forum links out to accounts on X and Telegram, which are normal community channels rather than a payment flow, and there is no affiliate or checkout path in the evidence. Because one adverse antivirus detection exists and the domain is young with limited independent verification, the site sits at Moderate Risk rather than Safe or Low Risk.
What the site appears to be
The visible page identifies the brand as OneHack, also written 1Hack, at onehack.st. It is set up as a community forum where members share tutorials, tools and resources rather than as a storefront or a licensed service. The page also points to a 'Mini Tools' area described as free tools by OneHack.st.
The site links outward to a profile on X and a channel on Telegram under OneHack branding. These are cross-site links to social platforms, and the evidence shows no commercial or payment intent behind them.
Technical checks versus operator risk
The technical picture is mixed. The saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection and the hosting IP has an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across zero saved reports, both of which are favourable. The browser threat feed returned no threat warning at the time of the check, so the domain is not currently on that blocklist.
However, one independent antivirus family, Chong Lua Dao, reported an adverse result for this domain. That saved observation is described as stale and comes from a saved antivirus store rather than a fresh submission, so the detection should be treated as real but time-limited. Since the domain is only 292 days old, the flag is not offset by a long track record of clean scanning or by an abundance of independent reputation data.
What this means for visitors
OneHack appears to be a forum for sharing tools and tutorials, with a free 'Mini Tools' area. Because the content is member-generated, the safety of anything downloaded or followed from the forum depends on who posted it; the site itself does not guarantee that third-party tools are clean. The scanned page shows no direct contact email, which makes it harder to resolve problems with an operator through a verified channel.
The outbound links go to OneHack profiles on X and Telegram. Those are normal community channels, but they are external platforms where conversations and file sharing happen away from the onehack.st domain, so visitors should treat the forum and the social channels as separate sources of unverified material.
Why the score is 65
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
1/ 91
detectionsSaved analysis from September 7, 2026 - stale
1 engine flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 1
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 91
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| Chong Lua DaoMalicious | malicious |
All 91 engine results
- Chong Lua Dao - Malicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Unrated
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- alphaMountain.aiInformation Technology
- BitDefenderadvice
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekerinformation technology
- Sophosinformation technology
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
OneHack a.k.a 1Hack
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
OneHack a.k.a 1Hack
What the page says about itself
What the site says about itself, quoted from the pages we read. The site wrote these words; they are not our findings.
- Page title
OneHack a.k.a 1Hack - Together WE Learn 🚀
- Meta description
Free Learning Community — courses, tools, tutorials, and premium resources. Together WE Learn. OneHack a.k.a 1Hack — where curiosity meets creation.
Pages we read
- Main page/Read
- Terms/tosRead
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
OneHack a.k.a 1Hack - Together WE Learn 🚀
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 58 antivirus results.
What independent research found
The search completed without a material external warning or corroborating report.
What remains unverified
1 of the 6 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Content
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 011 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
- 02The registrable domain is only 292 days old, so it has a short track record.
- 03The hosting IP has an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across zero saved reports.
Web research findings
Independent findings for onehack.st, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for onehack.st. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainonehack.st
- Redirects toonehack.st
- Hosted byCloudflare, Inc.
Domain Timeline
- Jan 13, 2026Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 9 months old when this review was saved.
- Nov 1, 2026Saved security review — Rated Moderate Risk
The evidence in this saved scan is mixed or incomplete; the completed checks are detailed above.
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
- No direct contact email found on the captured page.
- Links to 4 social profiles.
Domain & Encryption
Certificate issued for onehack.st.
A shared Cloudflare address answers for many sites, so it is not the site's own server and says nothing about who runs it.
Payment providers the page loads
None seen among the outside domains we saved.
Read from the first 20 outside domains the page loads and the shop platform it uses; the web server and platform rows are under Hosting & Technology. A payment script on the page does not prove the shop accepts that method at checkout, or that you are protected.
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://onehack.st/
- 2200https://onehack.st/
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentcomplete
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No direct contact email was found on the captured page.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 1 of 91 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · analysed Sep 7, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Nov 1, 2026 |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Nov 1, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Nov 1, 2026 |
| Independent research | The search completed without a material external finding | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Nov 1, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result1 of 91 engines flagged
- CompletionLimitedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Sep 7, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Nov 1, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Nov 1, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Nov 1, 2026
- Independent research
- ResultThe search completed without a material external finding
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Nov 1, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is onehack.st a scam or is it safe?
Is onehack.st safe to use?
Has onehack.st been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is onehack.st on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the onehack.st domain?
Does onehack.st have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is onehack.st hosted?
How often is the onehack.st report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
OneHack is a young community forum sharing tutorials and tools, and one saved antivirus check flagged it as malicious.
OneHack (onehack.st) presents itself as a user-generated community forum for sharing tutorials, tools and resources. The registrable domain is only 292 days old, and the only saved antivirus observation reports that one independent engine flagged the domain as malicious, though that result is stale. The browser threat feed returned no warning and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection, so the site is not currently blocked and its transport is encrypted. The forum links out to accounts on X and Telegram, which are normal community channels rather than a payment flow, and there is no affiliate or checkout path in the evidence. Because one adverse antivirus detection exists and the domain is young with limited independent verification, the site sits at Moderate Risk rather than Safe or Low Risk.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of onehack.st?Verify and reply