Is seguranca-live.com safe?
http://seguranca-live.com/
Coveragepartial2 of 4 applicable core capabilities
seguranca-live.com is a Microsoft-branded credential-harvesting login portal flagged as phishing by multiple security engines.
seguranca-live.com presents itself as a Microsoft account sign-in page, but it is not associated with Microsoft or any legitimate provider. Independent research describes a login-themed page imitating a Microsoft sign-in experience, and a scan of the domain found it flagged by 25 of 92 security engines, with several web-classification sources categorizing it as phishing, fraud-related, or malware-associated. A saved antivirus observation adds that 11 independent antivirus families returned an adverse result. The domain is only 165 days old, and its own pages could not be captured during analysis, so its contact, About and policy text was never reviewed. This combination of brand impersonation, broad adverse classification, and an unreadable, very new site places it in the Dangerous band.
Be the first to review seguranca-live.com
Lost money to seguranca-live.com? Warn others
Did you use seguranca-live.com?
Follow seguranca-live.com
Get a notification in your MalwareTips bell when new reviews arrive (one digest a day at most), when the verdict changes after a rescan, and when MalwareTips or the verified site owner replies. Unfollow any time.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
seguranca-live.com presents itself as a Microsoft account sign-in page, but it is not associated with Microsoft or any legitimate provider. Independent research describes a login-themed page imitating a Microsoft sign-in experience, and a scan of the domain found it flagged by 25 of 92 security engines, with several web-classification sources categorizing it as phishing, fraud-related, or malware-associated. A saved antivirus observation adds that 11 independent antivirus families returned an adverse result. The domain is only 165 days old, and its own pages could not be captured during analysis, so its contact, About and policy text was never reviewed. This combination of brand impersonation, broad adverse classification, and an unreadable, very new site places it in the Dangerous band.
Microsoft sign-in imitation with broad adverse classification
Independent research states that the domain hosts a login-themed webpage that imitates a Microsoft account sign-in experience. That is the defining shape of a credential-harvesting page: a visitor who types an email address and password into a page that looks like Microsoft's would be handing those credentials to whoever operates the site, not to Microsoft.
The same research reports that the domain was flagged by 25 out of 92 security engines, with several web-classification sources categorizing it as phishing, fraud-related, or malware-associated. A separate saved antivirus observation records adverse results from 11 independent antivirus families. These are independent classifications, not a single vendor's opinion, and they align with the impersonation described above.
Clean transport checks do not offset the operator risk
The browser threat feed returned no threat warning, and the saved TLS check did not validate the connection. These are transport and blocklist observations only; they mean no warning was raised at the time of the check, not that the site is safe. A phishing page can be served over a valid or invalid connection and still harvest whatever is typed into it.
The site's own page, contact, About and policy text could not be captured because the connection failed with a socket hang up. That means there is no operator identity, no company information, and no policy text to weigh against the impersonation finding. The registrable domain is only 165 days old, which is consistent with a short-lived phishing deployment rather than an established service.
Why the score is 12
11 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
13/ 94
detectionsSaved analysis from October 2, 2026 - stale
13 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 12
- Suspicious
- 1
- Total
- 94
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| alphaMountain.aiMalicious | phishing |
| BitDefenderMalicious | phishing |
| Chong Lua DaoMalicious | malicious |
| Forcepoint ThreatSeekerMalicious | phishing |
| FortinetMalicious | phishing |
| G-DataMalicious | phishing |
| GridinsoftMalicious | phishing |
| LionicMalicious | phishing |
| SeclookupMalicious | malicious |
| SophosMalicious | phishing |
| VIPREMalicious | phishing |
| WebrootMalicious | malicious |
| ESETSuspicious | suspicious |
All 94 engine results
- alphaMountain.ai - phishing - Malicious
- BitDefender - phishing - Malicious
- Chong Lua Dao - Malicious
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - phishing - Malicious
- Fortinet - phishing - Malicious
- G-Data - phishing - Malicious
- Gridinsoft - phishing - Malicious
- Lionic - phishing - Malicious
- Seclookup - Malicious
- Sophos - phishing - Malicious
- VIPRE - phishing - Malicious
- Webroot - Malicious
- ESET - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- CINS Army - Clean
- Cluster25 - Unrated
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Unrated
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Independent evidence classifies the site as login portal, but the page's own claim could not be captured.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
2 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
2 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
Phishing & Impersonation
Service and business model
Login Portal
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01One public warning on a scam-warning or security site: "The domain seguranca-live.com appears to host a login-themed webpage that imitates a Microsoft account sign-in experience."
- 0211 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
- 03The registrable domain is 165 days old.
Web research findings
Independent findings for seguranca-live.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- PCriskopen
"The domain seguranca-live.com appears to host a login-themed webpage that imitates a Microsoft account sign-in experience."
- PCriskopen
"The domain was flagged by 25 out of 92 security engines, and several web-classification sources categorized it as phishing, fraud-related, or malware-associated."
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainseguranca-live.com
- Redirects toseguranca-live.com
- Hosted byTeam Internet AG
Domain Timeline
- May 12, 2026Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 5 months old when this review was saved.
- Oct 24, 2026Saved security review — Rated Dangerous
The completed checks from this saved scan are detailed above.
seguranca-live.com was registered very recently when this review was saved and was already flagged. Freshly-registered domains are disproportionately used for scams, and a young domain with active threat signals warrants extra caution.
Domain & Encryption
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentunavailable
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidenceunavailable
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
11 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing. · The saved TLS check did not validate the connection
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
One public warning on a scam-warning or security site: "The domain seguranca-live.com appears to host a login-themed webpage that imitates a Microsoft account sign-in experience."
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 13 of 94 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · analysed Oct 2, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 24, 2026 |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | The saved page capture was not reliable enough to use | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Independent research | 2 independent findings were saved | Completed | Adverse | this scan · Oct 24, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result13 of 94 engines flagged
- CompletionLimited
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Oct 2, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 24, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionUnavailable
- FindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- ResultThe saved page capture was not reliable enough to use
- CompletionUnavailable
- FindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Independent research
- Result2 independent findings were saved
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 24, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is seguranca-live.com a scam or a legit website?
Is seguranca-live.com safe to use?
I already paid or entered my details on seguranca-live.com — what should I do?
Can I get my money back from seguranca-live.com?
Did seguranca-live.com steal my password or personal information?
How do I report seguranca-live.com?
seguranca-live.com looks professional — how can it still be a scam?
Has seguranca-live.com been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is seguranca-live.com on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the seguranca-live.com domain?
Where is seguranca-live.com hosted?
How often is the seguranca-live.com report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
seguranca-live.com is a Microsoft-branded credential-harvesting login portal flagged as phishing by multiple security engines.
The written conclusion remains part of the saved report.
seguranca-live.com presents itself as a Microsoft account sign-in page, but it is not associated with Microsoft or any legitimate provider. Independent research describes a login-themed page imitating a Microsoft sign-in experience, and a scan of the domain found it flagged by 25 of 92 security engines, with several web-classification sources categorizing it as phishing, fraud-related, or malware-associated. A saved antivirus observation adds that 11 independent antivirus families returned an adverse result. The domain is only 165 days old, and its own pages could not be captured during analysis, so its contact, About and policy text was never reviewed. This combination of brand impersonation, broad adverse classification, and an unreadable, very new site places it in the Dangerous band.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of seguranca-live.com?Verify and reply