Is sifu.lol safe?
http://sifu.lol/
Coveragestrong3 of 4 applicable core capabilities
sifu.lol is a young domain that silently redirects visitors to a Kiwi Farms forum thread and is flagged by multiple security engines
sifu.lol does not present its own content. The saved navigation evidence shows the address redirecting the browser to an unrelated external domain, landing on a Kiwi Farms forum thread about a named individual. The registrable domain is only 301 days old, and the site's own contact and policy pages were not read in full. Independent research found the domain flagged as suspicious by security vendors, with one scanner reporting 6 of 91 engines classifying it under spam or suspicious activity and one indicating malicious behavior. The browser threat feed returned no warning and the encrypted connection is valid, but those are absence-of-detection results, not evidence of a trustworthy operator. Because the site's own pages could not be reviewed and the domain has no established reputation, this cannot be rated Safe or Low Risk.
Be the first to review sifu.lol
Lost money to sifu.lol? Warn others
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
sifu.lol does not present its own content. The saved navigation evidence shows the address redirecting the browser to an unrelated external domain, landing on a Kiwi Farms forum thread about a named individual. The registrable domain is only 301 days old, and the site's own contact and policy pages were not read in full. Independent research found the domain flagged as suspicious by security vendors, with one scanner reporting 6 of 91 engines classifying it under spam or suspicious activity and one indicating malicious behavior. The browser threat feed returned no warning and the encrypted connection is valid, but those are absence-of-detection results, not evidence of a trustworthy operator. Because the site's own pages could not be reviewed and the domain has no established reputation, this cannot be rated Safe or Low Risk.
What the domain actually does
The only target-bound behaviour captured is a redirect: the browser was sent from sifu.lol to an unrelated external domain, specifically a Kiwi Farms forum thread concerning an individual named Alexander Ferguson Smith. The screenshot review shows a browser-check page for kiwifarms.st, consistent with the redirect landing on that forum rather than on any content hosted at sifu.lol itself.
The domain is 301 days old, so it is not an established property with a long history. The site's own contact details were not reviewed because the page text was not read in full, which means there is no verified operator identity, address, or policy text to weigh against the redirect behaviour.
Reputation flags versus clean technical checks
Independent research produced adverse findings. One vendor currently classifies the site as a suspicious website and highlights four blacklist detections. A second scanner reports the domain flagged by 6 out of 91 security engines, with several classifying it under spam or suspicious activity and one indicating malicious behavior. A saved antivirus observation also records two independent antivirus families reporting an adverse result, though that observation is marked stale and should be treated as real but time-sensitive.
On the other side, the browser threat feed returned no threat warning and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection. These are clean technical results, but they only mean no detection was recorded at the time of the check. They do not establish that the operator is trustworthy, and they do not offset the redirect to an unrelated forum or the vendor flags.
Why the score is 40
2 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
3/ 91
detectionsSaved analysis from September 22, 2026 - stale
3 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 2
- Suspicious
- 1
- Total
- 91
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| Bfore.Ai PreCrimeMalicious | malicious |
| Chong Lua DaoMalicious | malicious |
| alphaMountain.aiSuspicious | spam |
All 91 engine results
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Malicious
- Chong Lua Dao - Malicious
- alphaMountain.ai - spam - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Unrated
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Clean
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Unrated
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
Checking your browser
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Checking your browser
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Browser check — kiwifarms.st
What we observed
Saved browser evidence recorded cross domain landing.
What independent research found
2 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
1 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
Aggressive Ads & Malvertising
Service and business model
Content
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01The page redirected the browser to an unrelated external domain.
- 02The registrable domain is 301 days old.
- 03The site's own contact details were not reviewed because the page text was not read in full.
If this is a scam — what it means for you
What a visitor experiences
A visitor who opens sifu.lol is not shown a site of its own; the browser is redirected to an unrelated external domain, a Kiwi Farms forum thread about a named individual. The screenshot review shows a browser-check page for kiwifarms.st, matching that landing destination.
If this is a scam, how it works
The evidence-backed path
Each stage below is preserved from the grounded analysis and linked to saved evidence.
Because the site's own pages were not read in full, there is no reviewed contact, About, or policy text to explain who runs the domain or why it redirects. The visitor is therefore sent to third-party forum content without any operator disclosure on the domain itself.
Do not treat sifu.lol as a normal website. It redirects visitors to an unrelated forum thread, it is only 301 days old, its own pages were not reviewed, and independent scanners flag it as suspicious. If you reached it from a link or message, close the tab and avoid entering any personal information or credentials on the destination page. If you need to view the forum content, navigate to the forum directly rather than through this redirect.
Web research findings
Independent findings for sifu.lol, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- Gridinsoftopen
"Suspicious Website Gridinsoft currently classifies this site as Suspicious Website. The report highlights 4 blacklist detections"
- PCriskopen
"The domain was flagged by 6 out of 91 security engines, with several classifying it under spam or suspicious activity, and one indicating malicious behavior."
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainsifu.lol
- Redirects tokiwifarms.st
- Hosted by1776 Solutions, LLC
- Referencesusips.org
Domain Timeline
- Dec 21, 2025Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 10 months old when this review was saved.
- Oct 19, 2026Saved security review — Rated High Risk
The completed checks from this saved scan are detailed above.
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
Domain & Encryption
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://sifu.lol/
- 2302https://sifu.lol/
- 3203https://kiwifarms.st/threads/alexander-ferguson-smith-sifu-sifuambience-sifusmith.238168/cross-domain
Server Reputation
Referenced Domains
Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentcomplete
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
2 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
2 independent sources carry complaints or warnings about this site, including: "The domain was flagged by 6 out of 91 security engines, with several classifying it under spam or suspicious activity, and one indicating malicious behavior." · 2 independent sources carry complaints or warnings about this site, including: "Suspicious Website Gridinsoft currently classifies this site as Suspicious Website. The report highlights 4 blacklist detections"
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 3 of 91 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · analysed Sep 22, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 203 | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Independent research | 2 independent findings were saved | Completed | Adverse | this scan · Oct 19, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result3 of 91 engines flagged
- CompletionLimited
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Sep 22, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 19, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 203
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 19, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 19, 2026
- Independent research
- Result2 independent findings were saved
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 19, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is sifu.lol a scam or a legit site?
Is sifu.lol safe to use?
What is the risk from the ads and redirects on sifu.lol?
Why does sifu.lol open unrelated pages or pop-ups?
How do I stop the pop-ups or notifications from sifu.lol?
Has sifu.lol been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is sifu.lol on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the sifu.lol domain?
Does sifu.lol have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is sifu.lol hosted?
How often is the sifu.lol report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
sifu.lol is a young domain that silently redirects visitors to a Kiwi Farms forum thread and is flagged by multiple security engines
sifu.lol does not present its own content. The saved navigation evidence shows the address redirecting the browser to an unrelated external domain, landing on a Kiwi Farms forum thread about a named individual. The registrable domain is only 301 days old, and the site's own contact and policy pages were not read in full. Independent research found the domain flagged as suspicious by security vendors, with one scanner reporting 6 of 91 engines classifying it under spam or suspicious activity and one indicating malicious behavior. The browser threat feed returned no warning and the encrypted connection is valid, but those are absence-of-detection results, not evidence of a trustworthy operator. Because the site's own pages could not be reviewed and the domain has no established reputation, this cannot be rated Safe or Low Risk.
09 · Community