Is sint-truiden.be safe?
http://sint-truiden.be/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: strong · 3 of 4 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (59 of 92 engines answered) · saved result: did not fully complete
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading: completed
- page capture: completed
- domain records · not available: did not fully complete
- web research: completed
Official Sint-Truiden municipal website shows no security or deception indicators.
This is the official digital portal of the Belgian city of Sint-Truiden (Lokaal bestuur Sint-Truiden), a local government information site rather than a commercial storefront. The page content reviewed is Dutch-language civic navigation — links to Mijn Burgerprofiel, Ondernemen, Sociaal Huis and social channels under the Lokaal bestuur Sint-Truiden name — and the vision capture shows the plain 'Sint-Truiden / sint-truiden.be' identity text. Technical checks returned clean results: the browser threat feed reported no threat warning, the TLS connection is valid, and the hosting IP carries an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across 0 saved reports. No affiliate, supplement, casino, fake-shop or cross-domain order flow appears in the evidence; the outbound links are government and social-media destinations consistent with a municipal portal. The score reflects a clean, non-commercial civic site with a minor gap — the captured page did not surface a direct contact email — and no evidence of any operator or customer-facing risk.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 88/100
Safe covers scores 85–100. No adverse finding was saved; 4 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
No adverse finding was saved with this report.
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe browser threat feed returned no threat warning for the scanned URL.
- SupportsThe saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection.
- SupportsVisible identity strings and social labels consistently present the site as Lokaal bestuur Sint-Truiden, matching the expected official naming of a Belgian municipal portal.
- SupportsThe hosting IP shows an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across 0 saved reports.
Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
This is the official digital portal of the Belgian city of Sint-Truiden (Lokaal bestuur Sint-Truiden), a local government information site rather than a commercial storefront. The page content reviewed is Dutch-language civic navigation — links to Mijn Burgerprofiel, Ondernemen, Sociaal Huis and social channels under the Lokaal bestuur Sint-Truiden name — and the vision capture shows the plain 'Sint-Truiden / sint-truiden.be' identity text. Technical checks returned clean results: the browser threat feed reported no threat warning, the TLS connection is valid, and the hosting IP carries an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across 0 saved reports. No affiliate, supplement, casino, fake-shop or cross-domain order flow appears in the evidence; the outbound links are government and social-media destinations consistent with a municipal portal. The score reflects a clean, non-commercial civic site with a minor gap — the captured page did not surface a direct contact email — and no evidence of any operator or customer-facing risk.
What the site actually is
The captured page presents itself as the municipal portal for Sint-Truiden, Belgium. The visible identity strings are 'Sint-Truiden', 'Sint-Truiden' and the domain 'sint-truiden.be', and the social links are explicitly labelled 'Lokaal bestuur Sint-Truiden' on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram and YouTube. That naming is consistent with a local government (lokaal bestuur) presence rather than an anonymous commercial operator, and no affiliated storefront, checkout or product catalogue appears anywhere in the evidence.
The navigation blocks point to civic services and destinations rather than commercial funnels: 'Mijn Burgerprofiel' (the Belgian citizen profile login), 'Ondernemen' (entrepreneurship) linking toward ondernemeninsinttruiden.be, and 'Sociaal Huis' linking toward ocmw-st-truiden.be. These are cross-site references to other Belgian public or municipal domains, not an affiliate or order path. A footer credit reads 'LCP nv 2026 ©', matching the lcp.be link reflected in the commercial link graph — a website vendor credit, not a monetisation mechanism.
Technical clean, operator risk unremarkable
On the technical dimension the results are benign. The browser threat feed returned no threat warning, the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection, and the hosting IP has an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across 0 saved reports. These mean no detections were recorded at scan time — they are not proof of safety by themselves, but here they align with a site whose content is ordinary civic navigation rather than a download or checkout flow.
On the operator and customer dimension there is no adverse evidence at all in our review: no confirmed risk mechanics, no affiliate relationships, no counter-evidence and no commercial CTA graph beyond public-service and social destinations. The only observed page issue is minor — the captured page did not surface a direct contact email — which is a documentation gap common on government portals that route citizens through contact forms and service counters. It is not treated as a deception signal and does not outweigh the clean picture.
No element of the evidence supports a fake-shop kit, clone markup, subscription trap, casino, withdrawal wall or other commercial-deception pattern. The cross-domain links observed (facebook.com, linkedin.com, instagram.com, youtube.com, burgerprofiel.be, ondernemeninsinttruiden.be, ocmw-st-truiden.be, lcp.be, app-eu.readspeaker.com) are consistent with a municipal site embedding accessibility support and social channels, with no commercialIntent or explicitMonetization flags attached.
Why the score is 88
The saved checks and analysis found no material threat. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
0/ 92
No detectionsSaved analysis from August 21, 2026 - stale
No detections across 59 engines that rated this URL
No antivirus engine that answered raised an adverse result; 33 had no rating for this URL. This is one signal, not a guarantee.
- Malicious
- 0
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 92
All 92 engine results
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- Cluster25 - Unrated
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- alphaMountain.aiReference
- BitDefendermisc
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekergovernment
- Googlegovernment
- Sophostravel
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
Sint-Truiden
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Sint-Truiden
What the page says about itself
What the site says about itself, quoted from the pages we read. The site wrote these words; they are not our findings.
- Page title
Startpagina - Sint-Truiden
Pages we read
- Main page/Read
- Contact page/contactRead
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Startpagina - Sint-Truiden
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 59 antivirus results.
What independent research found
The search completed without a material external warning or corroborating report.
What remains unverified
1 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Content
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01The browser threat feed returned no threat warning for the scanned URL.
- 02The saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection.
- 03The hosting IP shows an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across 0 saved reports.
Web research findings
Independent findings for sint-truiden.be, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for sint-truiden.be. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainsint-truiden.be
- Redirects towww.sint-truiden.be
- Hosted byDC STAR nv
- Referencesapp-eu.readspeaker.com · burgerprofiel.be
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
- No direct contact email found on the captured page.
- Phone number listed (011 70 14 14).
- Links to 12 social profiles.
Domain & Encryption
Certificate issued for www.sint-truiden.be.
Payment providers the page loads
None seen among the outside domains we saved.
Read from the first 20 outside domains the page loads and the shop platform it uses; the web server and platform rows are under Hosting & Technology. A payment script on the page does not prove the shop accepts that method at checkout, or that you are protected.
Redirect Chain
- 1308http://sint-truiden.be/
- 2302https://sint-truiden.be/
- 3200https://www.sint-truiden.be/
Server Reputation
Referenced Domains
Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentcomplete
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
unknownMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 0 of 92 engines flagged | Limited | No saved finding | stale fallback · analysed Aug 21, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 17, 2026 |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 17, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 17, 2026 |
| Independent research | The search completed without a material external finding | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 17, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result0 of 92 engines flagged
- CompletionLimitedFindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Aug 21, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 17, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 17, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 17, 2026
- Independent research
- ResultThe search completed without a material external finding
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 17, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is sint-truiden.be legit and safe?
Is sint-truiden.be safe to use?
Could a legitimate site like sint-truiden.be still be used in a scam?
Has sint-truiden.be been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is sint-truiden.be on any phishing or malware blacklists?
Does sint-truiden.be have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is sint-truiden.be hosted?
How often is the sint-truiden.be report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Official Sint-Truiden municipal website shows no security or deception indicators.
This is the official digital portal of the Belgian city of Sint-Truiden (Lokaal bestuur Sint-Truiden), a local government information site rather than a commercial storefront. The page content reviewed is Dutch-language civic navigation — links to Mijn Burgerprofiel, Ondernemen, Sociaal Huis and social channels under the Lokaal bestuur Sint-Truiden name — and the vision capture shows the plain 'Sint-Truiden / sint-truiden.be' identity text. Technical checks returned clean results: the browser threat feed reported no threat warning, the TLS connection is valid, and the hosting IP carries an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across 0 saved reports. No affiliate, supplement, casino, fake-shop or cross-domain order flow appears in the evidence; the outbound links are government and social-media destinations consistent with a municipal portal. The score reflects a clean, non-commercial civic site with a minor gap — the captured page did not surface a direct contact email — and no evidence of any operator or customer-facing risk.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of sint-truiden.be?Verify and reply