Is sites.buliangdh.blog safe?
http://sites.buliangdh.blog/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: complete · 4 of 4 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (56 of 93 engines answered): completed
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading: completed
- page capture: completed
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
不良研究所 is a Chinese-language link portal that rotates domains and coaches visitors on bypassing browser blocks, with no operator identity disclosed.
The page is a navigation hub titled 不良研究所导航 that lists shortcuts to mainstream Chinese news, social and video platforms such as 微博热搜, 腾讯新闻, 爱奇艺 and 优酷视频, alongside browser downloads and a set of rotating 'enter address' links. Its own copy tells visitors that mainland browsers block the site and recommends installing Chrome, X浏览器, Alook, Firefox or Safari to reach it, and it publishes only a Gmail 'come home' address rather than any company, registration or postal details. Technical checks are largely clean — a valid encrypted connection, no browser threat feed warning, and a domain roughly 607 days old — but one antivirus family out of the aggregate flagged the domain, and the site's purpose is to funnel visitors to addresses whose destinations are not shown on the page. That combination of an anonymous, block-evading redirect hub with a single adverse detection places it in the moderate-risk band rather than Safe.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 62/100
Moderate Risk covers scores 45–69. 1 finding pulled the score down; 3 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- Moderate1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result.-13 pts
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection
- SupportsGoogle Safe Browsing returned no threat warning
- SupportsThe registrable domain is 607 days old
Points come from the saved evidence ledger: it lowered the score from 75 to 62 and split those 13 points between the findings that show points; the others carry no points in the ledger. Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
The page is a navigation hub titled 不良研究所导航 that lists shortcuts to mainstream Chinese news, social and video platforms such as 微博热搜, 腾讯新闻, 爱奇艺 and 优酷视频, alongside browser downloads and a set of rotating 'enter address' links. Its own copy tells visitors that mainland browsers block the site and recommends installing Chrome, X浏览器, Alook, Firefox or Safari to reach it, and it publishes only a Gmail 'come home' address rather than any company, registration or postal details. Technical checks are largely clean — a valid encrypted connection, no browser threat feed warning, and a domain roughly 607 days old — but one antivirus family out of the aggregate flagged the domain, and the site's purpose is to funnel visitors to addresses whose destinations are not shown on the page. That combination of an anonymous, block-evading redirect hub with a single adverse detection places it in the moderate-risk band rather than Safe.
A rotating-address navigation portal, not a shop or service
The captured page is headed 不良研究所导航 and presents itself as a directory of links. The visible entries are ordinary, well-known destinations: 微博热搜, 抖音热榜, 哔哩热榜, 贴吧热榜, 腾讯新闻, 搜狐网, 头条新闻, 凤凰网, 观察者网, 爱奇艺, 优酷视频, 豆瓣电影, plus browser downloads such as Chrome, X浏览器, Alook浏览器 and 火狐浏览器. Nothing on the page asks for payment, credentials or personal data.
The distinguishing feature is the address block: 不良研究所最新可用地址: 进入地址一 进入地址二 进入地址三. The site openly maintains several interchangeable entry points, which is the behaviour of a portal that expects to be blocked or taken down and to reappear elsewhere. The destinations behind those three 'enter address' links are not shown on the captured page, so what a visitor ultimately reaches through them cannot be verified from this evidence.
Operator transparency is minimal. The only contact route published is a Gmail 'come home' address written with an obfuscated @ symbol, and no company name, registration number or postal address appears. A free webmail contact on an anonymous link hub gives a visitor no accountable party if a linked destination turns out to be harmful.
Clean transport, one adverse detection, and an unverifiable operator
On the technical side the picture is mostly reassuring but not clean. The saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection, and the browser threat feed returned no threat warning for the domain. The registrable domain is about 607 days old, which is long enough to be more than a throwaway but far from an established reputation.
Against that, the antivirus aggregate shows one independent engine family reporting an adverse result while the remaining engines found nothing — an isolated flag with no vendor consensus. A single detection is not proof of malware, and it should not be read as one, but it is a real adverse data point that keeps this site out of the Safe band when combined with the anonymous, block-evading nature of the portal.
The operator side is where the uncertainty concentrates. The site discloses no owner, no entity and no verifiable address, and its own text is written for visitors who are already being blocked. That does not by itself prove fraud, and no financial fraud, subscription trap or malicious download was observed in the captured content, but it means the site's accountability rests entirely on an anonymous Gmail contact.
Why the score is 62
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
1/ 93
detectionsFresh result
1 engine flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 1
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 93
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| CRDFMalicious | malicious |
All 93 engine results
- CRDF - Malicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Unrated
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Unrated
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Unrated
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
不良研究所导航
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
不良研究所导航
What the page says about itself
What the site says about itself, quoted from the pages we read. The site wrote these words; they are not our findings.
- Page title
在嘈杂生活中的一块自留地
- Meta description
- The same text as the page title
Pages we read
- Main page/Read
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
在嘈杂生活中的一块自留地
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 56 antivirus results.
What independent research found
The search completed without a material external warning or corroborating report.
What remains unverified
The checks completed, but ownership, business claims, and future site behavior can still change after this snapshot.
If this is a scam — what it means for you
What actually happens when you follow the site's own instructions
A visitor arriving from a mainland browser is told the site will be blocked and is instructed to install a different browser — Chrome on desktop, X浏览器 or Alook on Android, Firefox, Alook, Chrome or Safari on iPhone — and to remember to type https:// in front of the address. Following that advice means installing third-party software and manually retyping addresses on the strength of an anonymous page's recommendation.
If this is a scam, how it works
The evidence-backed path
Each stage below is preserved from the grounded analysis and linked to saved evidence.
The second step is choosing one of the rotating entry links, 进入地址一, 进入地址二 or 进入地址三. Because the page does not display where those links lead, the visitor's exposure is determined entirely by the destination, which this evidence does not capture. The portal itself is the hand-off point, not the endpoint.
Treat this site as a convenience portal with no accountable operator rather than a trusted destination. If you use it, do not install browsers or other software on its recommendation — get Chrome, Firefox or Safari from the official vendor sites instead — and be aware that the 'enter address' links lead somewhere the page does not disclose, so judge each destination on its own merits before entering any credentials or payment details. The published Gmail address is the only contact route, so there is no one to hold responsible if a linked site misbehaves.
Web research findings
Independent findings for sites.buliangdh.blog, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for sites.buliangdh.blog. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainsites.buliangdh.blog
- Redirects tosites.buliangdh.blog
- Hosted byCloudflare, Inc.
- Referencesiplaysoft.com · xbext.com
Domain Timeline
- Feb 20, 2025Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 1.6 years old when this review was saved.
- Oct 20, 2026Saved security review — Rated Moderate Risk
The evidence in this saved scan is mixed or incomplete; the completed checks are detailed above.
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
- No direct contact email found on the captured page.
Domain & Encryption
Cloudflare DNS is used by legitimate and scam sites alike, so it does not identify who runs the site.
Certificate issued for buliangdh.blog.
A shared Cloudflare address answers for many sites, so it is not the site's own server and says nothing about who runs it.
Payment providers the page loads
None seen among the outside domains we saved.
Read from the first 20 outside domains the page loads and the shop platform it uses; the web server and platform rows are under Hosting & Technology. A payment script on the page does not prove the shop accepts that method at checkout, or that you are protected.
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://sites.buliangdh.blog/
- 2200https://sites.buliangdh.blog/
Server Reputation
Referenced Domains
Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruscomplete
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentcomplete
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result.
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 1 of 93 engines flagged | Completed | Adverse | fresh · analysed Oct 20, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 20, 2026 |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 20, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 20, 2026 |
| Independent research | The search completed without a material external finding | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 20, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result1 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionCompletedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessfresh · analysed Oct 20, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 20, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 20, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 20, 2026
- Independent research
- ResultThe search completed without a material external finding
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 20, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is sites.buliangdh.blog a scam or is it safe?
Is sites.buliangdh.blog safe to use?
Has sites.buliangdh.blog been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is sites.buliangdh.blog on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the sites.buliangdh.blog domain?
Does sites.buliangdh.blog have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is sites.buliangdh.blog hosted?
How often is the sites.buliangdh.blog report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
不良研究所 is a Chinese-language link portal that rotates domains and coaches visitors on bypassing browser blocks, with no operator identity disclosed.
The page is a navigation hub titled 不良研究所导航 that lists shortcuts to mainstream Chinese news, social and video platforms such as 微博热搜, 腾讯新闻, 爱奇艺 and 优酷视频, alongside browser downloads and a set of rotating 'enter address' links. Its own copy tells visitors that mainland browsers block the site and recommends installing Chrome, X浏览器, Alook, Firefox or Safari to reach it, and it publishes only a Gmail 'come home' address rather than any company, registration or postal details. Technical checks are largely clean — a valid encrypted connection, no browser threat feed warning, and a domain roughly 607 days old — but one antivirus family out of the aggregate flagged the domain, and the site's purpose is to funnel visitors to addresses whose destinations are not shown on the page. That combination of an anonymous, block-evading redirect hub with a single adverse detection places it in the moderate-risk band rather than Safe.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of sites.buliangdh.blog?Verify and reply