Is slimerng.com safe?
http://slimerng.com/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: partial · 2 of 4 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (58 of 92 engines answered) · saved result: did not fully complete
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading · limited: did not fully complete
- page capture · limited: did not fully complete
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
Roblox fan-guide domain could not be reviewed and shows no established reputation
slimerng.com presents itself as an independent, fan-made resource for the Roblox game 'Slime RNG', covering codes, tier lists and game mechanics. The technical picture is clean: the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection, the browser threat feed returned no threat warning, and the hosting IP carries an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across 0 saved reports. However, the site's own pages could not be read at all — the scan received an HTTP 451 response, so no About, contact or policy text was ever reviewed — and the registrable domain is only 173 days old. With the site's own content unread and no established reputation, we cannot treat the clean technical checks as proof of safety, so the score sits in the Moderate Risk band.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 62/100
Moderate Risk covers scores 45–69. 1 finding pulled the score down; 1 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- MinorThe site's own page, contact, About and policy text could not be reviewed because the server returned HTTP 451.
What pushed the score up
- SupportsValid TLS, no Safe Browsing threat warning, and a hosting IP with 0/100 abuse confidence across 0 saved reports.
No points per finding are stored for this report: our analysis weighed all findings together to set the score. Each finding shows its saved severity instead (Decisive, Strong, Moderate or Minor). Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
slimerng.com presents itself as an independent, fan-made resource for the Roblox game 'Slime RNG', covering codes, tier lists and game mechanics. The technical picture is clean: the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection, the browser threat feed returned no threat warning, and the hosting IP carries an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across 0 saved reports. However, the site's own pages could not be read at all — the scan received an HTTP 451 response, so no About, contact or policy text was ever reviewed — and the registrable domain is only 173 days old. With the site's own content unread and no established reputation, we cannot treat the clean technical checks as proof of safety, so the score sits in the Moderate Risk band.
What the scan actually captured
The most important observation is a gap: the page content could not be read because the server returned HTTP 451, and the screenshot review likewise shows only an 'Error 451' page. That means the site's own page, contact, About and policy text was never reviewed. Everything we can say about the site's purpose comes from our review, not from the site itself.
The registrable domain is 173 days old, which is young enough that no long track record exists. A young domain is not by itself evidence of wrongdoing, but it does mean there is no history to weigh against the unread content.
Clean technical checks, unverified operator
On the technical side there is nothing adverse to report. The saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection, the browser threat feed returned no threat warning, and the hosting IP has an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across 0 saved reports. These are genuine positives and they rule out the most obvious infrastructure-level threats.
They do not, however, tell us anything about who runs the site or what visitors actually see. Because the site's own pages were never read, the operator's identity, contact details and policies remain unverified. Clean antivirus and Safe Browsing results mean 'no detections', not 'safe', and with no readable content and no established reputation the site cannot be rated Safe or Low Risk.
Why the score is 62
The score combines saved deterministic evidence with the grounded analysis available for this report. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
0/ 92
No detectionsSaved analysis from May 5, 2026 - stale
No detections across 58 engines that rated this URL
No antivirus engine that answered raised an adverse result; 34 had no rating for this URL. This is one signal, not a guarantee.
- Malicious
- 0
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 92
All 92 engine results
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Unrated
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Unrated
- CINS Army - Clean
- Cluster25 - Unrated
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Clean
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Clean
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- securolytics - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Unrated
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekernewly registered websites
- Googlegaming
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
Error 451
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Error 451
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Independent evidence classifies the site as content, but the page's own claim could not be captured.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
The search completed without a material external warning or corroborating report.
What remains unverified
2 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Content
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01The site's own page, contact, About and policy text could not be reviewed because the server returned HTTP 451.
- 02The registrable domain is 173 days old, so no long-term track record exists.
- 03Valid TLS, no Safe Browsing threat warning, and a hosting IP with 0/100 abuse confidence across 0 saved reports.
Web research findings
Independent findings for slimerng.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for slimerng.com. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainslimerng.com
- Redirects toslimerng.com
- Hosted byCloudflare, Inc.
Domain Timeline
- Apr 27, 2026Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 5 months old when this review was saved.
- Oct 17, 2026Saved security review — Rated Moderate Risk
The evidence in this saved scan is mixed or incomplete; the completed checks are detailed above.
slimerng.com was registered very recently when this review was saved. Freshly-registered domains are disproportionately used for scams, so a young domain whose evidence is mixed or incomplete warrants extra caution.
Domain & Encryption
Cloudflare DNS is used by legitimate and scam sites alike, so it does not identify who runs the site.
Certificate issued for slimerng.com.
A shared Cloudflare address answers for many sites, so it is not the site's own server and says nothing about who runs it.
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentpartial
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencepartial
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
unknownMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
The site's own page, contact, About and policy text could not be reviewed because the server returned HTTP 451.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 0 of 92 engines flagged | Limited | No saved finding | stale fallback · analysed May 5, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 17, 2026 |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Limited | No saved finding | this scan · Oct 17, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | The site blocked our capture or showed an error page; 1 visible observation saved | Limited | No saved finding | this scan · Oct 17, 2026 |
| Independent research | The search completed without a material external finding | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 17, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result0 of 92 engines flagged
- CompletionLimitedFindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed May 5, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 17, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionLimitedFindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 17, 2026
- Visual evidence
- ResultThe site blocked our capture or showed an error page; 1 visible observation saved
- CompletionLimitedFindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 17, 2026
- Independent research
- ResultThe search completed without a material external finding
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 17, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is slimerng.com a scam or is it safe?
Is slimerng.com safe to use?
Has slimerng.com been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is slimerng.com on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the slimerng.com domain?
Does slimerng.com have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is slimerng.com hosted?
How often is the slimerng.com report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Roblox fan-guide domain could not be reviewed and shows no established reputation
slimerng.com presents itself as an independent, fan-made resource for the Roblox game 'Slime RNG', covering codes, tier lists and game mechanics. The technical picture is clean: the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection, the browser threat feed returned no threat warning, and the hosting IP carries an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across 0 saved reports. However, the site's own pages could not be read at all — the scan received an HTTP 451 response, so no About, contact or policy text was ever reviewed — and the registrable domain is only 173 days old. With the site's own content unread and no established reputation, we cannot treat the clean technical checks as proof of safety, so the score sits in the Moderate Risk band.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of slimerng.com?Verify and reply