Is stakes.blog safe?

http://stakes.blog/

DangerousStatus

Coveragestrong3 of 4 applicable core capabilities

Verdict

New domain uses fake Stake airdrop to harvest wallet approvals

stakes.blog is a three-day-old site that presents itself as an educational portal about crypto security while directing visitors to connect non-custodial wallets under the pretext of claiming a 120-million-token airdrop. The page explicitly warns there is no verified official distribution yet still prompts users to approve wallet signatures, a classic drainer pattern.

Do not visit the site or connect any wallet. The combination of a brand-new domain, an unverified airdrop claim, and explicit wallet-approval prompts indicates a high likelihood of asset theft.
Read full analysis
Calibrated safety spectrum

Where this site sits

  1. Dangerous1–20
  2. High Risk21–44
  3. Moderate Risk45–69
  4. Low Risk70–84
  5. Safe85–100

The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.

01 · Investigation Brief

Investigation Brief

stakes.blog is a three-day-old site that presents itself as an educational portal about crypto security while directing visitors to connect non-custodial wallets under the pretext of claiming a 120-million-token airdrop. The page explicitly warns there is no verified official distribution yet still prompts users to approve wallet signatures, a classic drainer pattern.

Strongest evidence

The page contains a direct request for wallet secret, signature, or token approval framed as the way to obtain the promised benefit.

The same page states there is no verified official data confirming the 120,000,000 $STAKE distribution and warns users against phishing, yet still presents the airdrop claim as the reason to connect a wallet.

Technical versus operator risk

The registrable domain is only three days old, giving visitors no history or reputation to evaluate.

The site instructs users to connect only trusted non-custodial wallets, a common social-engineering step before prompting for approvals that can drain assets.

Visitor flow

Buttons labeled Explore Educational Guides and Learn About the Airdrop serve as entry points that lead visitors to the wallet-connection prompt.

Why the score is 12

The page asks for a wallet secret, signature or token approval to obtain a promised benefit. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.

02 · Security Evidence

Security evidence

Collected signals and independent provider data for this URL.

Antivirus Engines

1/ 95

detections

Saved result - stale

1 engine flagged this URL

Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.

Malicious
1
Suspicious
0
Total
95
Adverse antivirus results
EngineFinding
Bfore.Ai PreCrimeMaliciousmalicious
All 95 engine results
  • Bfore.Ai PreCrime - malicious - Malicious
  • 0xSI_f33d - unrated - Clean
  • Abusix - clean - Clean
  • Acronis - clean - Clean
  • ADMINUSLabs - clean - Clean
  • AILabs (MONITORAPP) - clean - Clean
  • AlienVault - clean - Clean
  • alphaMountain.ai - clean - Clean
  • AlphaSOC - unrated - Clean
  • Antiy-AVL - clean - Clean
  • ArcSight Threat Intelligence - unrated - Clean
  • Artists Against 419 - clean - Clean
  • AutoShun - unrated - Clean
  • benkow.cc - clean - Clean
  • BitDefender - clean - Clean
  • Bkav - unrated - Clean
  • BlockList - clean - Clean
  • Blueliv - clean - Clean
  • Certego - clean - Clean
  • Chong Lua Dao - clean - Clean
  • CINS Army - clean - Clean
  • Cluster25 - unrated - Clean
  • CMC Threat Intelligence - clean - Clean
  • CRDF - clean - Clean
  • Criminal IP - clean - Clean
  • CSIS Security Group - unrated - Clean
  • Cyan - unrated - Clean
  • Cyble - clean - Clean
  • CyRadar - clean - Clean
  • desenmascara.me - clean - Clean
  • DNS8 - clean - Clean
  • Dr.Web - clean - Clean
  • EmergingThreats - clean - Clean
  • Emsisoft - clean - Clean
  • Ermes - unrated - Clean
  • ESET - clean - Clean
  • ESTsecurity - clean - Clean
  • Feodo Tracker - clean - Clean
  • Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - unrated - Clean
  • Fortinet - clean - Clean
  • Fortra - unrated - Clean
  • G-Data - clean - Clean
  • Google Safe Browsing - clean - Clean
  • GreenSnow - clean - Clean
  • Gridinsoft - unrated - Clean
  • Heimdal Security - clean - Clean
  • Hunt.io Intelligence - unrated - Clean
  • IPsum - clean - Clean
  • Juniper Networks - clean - Clean
  • K7AntiVirus - clean - Clean
  • Kaspersky - clean - Clean
  • Lionic - clean - Clean
  • Lumu - unrated - Clean
  • Malwared - clean - Clean
  • MalwarePatrol - clean - Clean
  • malwares.com URL checker - clean - Clean
  • MalwareURL - unrated - Clean
  • Netcraft - unrated - Clean
  • OpenPhish - clean - Clean
  • PhishFort - unrated - Clean
  • Phishing Database - clean - Clean
  • Phishtank - clean - Clean
  • PREBYTES - clean - Clean
  • PrecisionSec - unrated - Clean
  • Quick Heal - clean - Clean
  • Quttera - clean - Clean
  • Rising - clean - Clean
  • SafeToOpen - unrated - Clean
  • Sangfor - clean - Clean
  • Sansec eComscan - unrated - Clean
  • Scantitan - clean - Clean
  • SCUMWARE.org - clean - Clean
  • Seclookup - clean - Clean
  • securolytics - clean - Clean
  • Snort IP sample list - clean - Clean
  • SOCRadar - unrated - Clean
  • Sophos - clean - Clean
  • Spam404 - clean - Clean
  • StopForumSpam - clean - Clean
  • Sucuri SiteCheck - clean - Clean
  • ThreatHive - clean - Clean
  • Threatsourcing - clean - Clean
  • Trustwave - clean - Clean
  • Underworld - unrated - Clean
  • URLhaus - clean - Clean
  • URLQuery - unrated - Clean
  • Viettel Threat Intelligence - clean - Clean
  • VIPRE - unrated - Clean
  • ViriBack - clean - Clean
  • VX Vault - clean - Clean
  • Webroot - clean - Clean
  • Xcitium Verdict Cloud - unrated - Clean
  • Yandex Safebrowsing - clean - Clean
  • ZeroCERT - clean - Clean
  • ZeroFox - unrated - Clean

Security Scans

Browser Threat Feed
Not flagged on major threat lists

Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.

What we observed

CAPTURED PAGE
stakes.blog
What our review noticed on this page
Visual analysis

Visual context from the captured page

Cookie Consent. We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. Read our Cookie Policy for more details.

Context only

What the captured page showed

1 observation
  1. 01

    Cookie Consent. We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. Read our Cookie Policy for more details.

03 · Investigation Story

Investigation story

The behavior, reputation, and operator evidence that explains how this site may affect a visitor.
  1. What the site claims

    Stake's Crypto Casino Blog

  2. What we observed

    The page content was captured and checked alongside 95 antivirus results.

  3. What independent research found

    The search completed without a material external warning or corroborating report.

  4. What remains unverified

    1 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.

What kind of site and risk is this?

Threat category

Investment, Crypto & Wallet Fraud

Also observed: Phishing & Impersonation

Service and business model

Web3

Unknown

Observed behavior

No disruptive browser behavior saved

Evidence behind this classification

  1. 01The page asks for a wallet secret, signature or token approval to obtain a promised benefit.
  2. 02Site warns there is no verified airdrop yet still uses the claim to drive wallet connections
  3. 03Domain registered only three days ago

Risk pattern correlation

Evidence correlation

Captured signals match known risk patterns

Moderate correlation

This view separates independent infrastructure evidence from pattern labels derived from the same captured page. Pattern matches add context, but they do not prove that the site belongs to a cross-domain scam network.

Correlation score
35/100
ClearLowModerateHighCritical
Evidence (2)
  • Airdrop / wallet-drainer template detected on the page.
  • Domain is only 3 days old and already carries multiple network-level red flags.
Correlated evidence (1)
Template · Airdrop Drainer

Web research findings

Independent findings for stakes.blog, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.

Business registration
No public record found
Could not match the site to a registered company — common for small sites.
Clone check
No clone detected
The completed research found no supported clone indicator.
Typosquat check
No look-alike match
The completed research found no supported look-alike match.
Web mentions
No scam reports found
The completed search returned no sourced scam reports or complaints.

No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for stakes.blog. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.

Reputation Sources

How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.

Google Safe Browsing
Not listedCheck ↗
VirusTotal
ListedCheck ↗
AbuseIPDB
Not listedCheck ↗

04 · Domain & Infrastructure

Domain & infrastructure

Timeline · identity · encryption · redirects · hosting

The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.

Infrastructure map

How the saved page connected to the wider web.

  1. Domainstakes.blog
  2. Redirects tostakes.blog
  3. Hosted byBrander Group Inc.
  4. Referencescdn.jsdelivr.net · unpkg.com

Domain Timeline

  1. Aug 5, 2026
    Domain registered

    First appeared in WHOIS records — 3 days old today.

  2. Aug 9, 2026
    Saved security review — Flagged as dangerous

    The completed checks from this saved scan are detailed above.

stakes.blog was registered very recently and is already flagged. Freshly-registered domains are disproportionately used for scams, and a young domain with active threat signals warrants extra caution.

Contact Verification

Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.

What We Found
Has a contact email on its own domain
Emails on site's domaincontact@stakes.blog
Phone numbers9074827028
Postal addressNot listed
Linked social profiles0
Signal Summary
Contact details look reasonable
  • Contact email on the site's own domain (contact@stakes.blog).
  • Phone number listed (9074827028).

Domain & Encryption

Domain History
Age3 days old
RegistrarDynadot LLC
RegisteredAug 5, 2026
ExpiresAug 5, 2027
Owner privacyUnknown
Encryption Certificate
StatusValid
ProtocolTLSv1.3
IssuerLet's Encrypt · YE1
ExpiresNov 3, 2026 (86d)
Self-signedNo
Hosting & Technology
HostingBrander Group Inc.
Server locationUS
Web serverhcdn

Redirect Chain

Hops
1
Cross-domain
No
Lookalike
No
Punycode
No
  • 1301http://stakes.blog/
  • 2200https://stakes.blog/

Server Reputation

Abuse Intelligence
Confidence score0%
Reports on file0
ISPBrander Group Inc.
Usage typeContent Delivery Network

Referenced Domains

Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.

05 · Evidence Ledger

Evidence ledger

Coverage, provenance, and source freshness remain separate so a missing check is never mistaken for a clean result.
  1. Antiviruspartial
  2. Browser threat feedcomplete
  3. Page contentcomplete
  4. Analysiscomplete
  5. Visual evidencecomplete
Completed analysis

The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.

Technical threat

malicious

Malware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.

Additional evidence review · Additional evidence review

Operator / customer risk

suspicious

Complaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.

Additional evidence review · Additional evidence review

Source coverage and freshness

Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.

Antivirus
Result1 of 95 engines flagged
CompletionLimited
FindingAdverse
Freshnessstale fallback · Aug 9, 2026
Browser protection
ResultNo browser threat-list match
CompletionCompleted
FindingNo adverse finding
FreshnessNot available
Page content
ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
CompletionCompleted
FindingNo adverse finding
FreshnessNot available
Visual evidence
Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
CompletionCompleted
FindingNo adverse finding
FreshnessNot available
Independent research
ResultThe search completed without a material external finding
CompletionCompleted
FindingNo adverse finding
FreshnessNot available

06 · Your Next Move

Your next move

Investment scam indicators

The page shows patterns common to HYIP, forex, pig-butchering, and guaranteed-returns grifts.

  1. Do not interact with stakes.blog

    Do not enter credentials, deposit money, download files, or install browser extensions from this site.

  2. Any money you send is almost certainly gone

    These schemes pay out early "profits" to bait bigger deposits, then block withdrawals or demand a "tax" / "liquidity fee" to release funds. Do not top up to unlock a withdrawal — that's the same grift.

  3. If you already deposited — act immediately

    Contact your bank or card issuer about a chargeback, freeze further transfers, and gather every screenshot, WhatsApp / Telegram thread, and transaction ID. Do not engage with "recovery agents" who reach out after the loss — those are themselves a follow-up scam.

  4. Report to your financial regulator

    US: sec.gov/tcr, cftc.gov or reportfraud.ftc.gov. UK: FCA ScamSmart. EU: your national financial regulator. Reports feed public warning registers other victims check.

    Open

Safer Alternatives

Trying to handle crypto? Use a safe option instead

Dealing with crypto? Use a regulated, well-established exchange rather than an unknown site — and never connect your wallet or enter a seed phrase on a page you can't verify.

  1. Coinbase

    Publicly-listed, regulated US exchange.

  2. Kraken

    Long-established, regulated exchange.

  3. Gemini

    Regulated US exchange & custodian.

Suggestions for safety only — not endorsements. Always verify the address bar before signing in or paying, even on well-known sites.

07 · Safety FAQ

Safety FAQ

Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

Is stakes.blog a scam or a legit crypto platform?
stakes.blog is a high-risk investment, crypto & wallet fraud — do not deposit funds or connect a wallet. Our review tagged it for airdrop drainer and crypto drainer. 1 of 95 security engines flag it (1 as outright malicious). The domain is only 3 days old through Dynadot LLC — a fresh registration is a classic scam fingerprint. This pattern matches throwaway sites built to take money or data and disappear.
Is stakes.blog safe to use?
No — stakes.blog has a Safety Score of 12/100 (Dangerous) because decisive threat evidence was saved with this scan. Leave the site and do not log in, pay, download anything, or connect a wallet.
I already deposited money on stakes.blog — what should I do?
If you've already paid or handed over details on stakes.blog, act quickly. 1) Cryptocurrency payments are almost always irreversible, so a bank chargeback usually won't apply — instead report the wallet address to the exchange you sent from and ask them to flag it. 2) Report the site to the U.S. FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov or the FBI's IC3 at ic3.gov, and in the UK to Action Fraud at actionfraud.police.uk. 3) If you entered a password, change it on stakes.blog and anywhere you reused it, and turn on two-factor authentication. 4) Watch your bank and email for follow-up fraud, and keep screenshots as evidence.
Can I get my money back from stakes.blog?
Possibly, but it's difficult. Crypto transfers can't be reversed like card payments, so recovery usually depends on the receiving exchange freezing the funds — report the wallet address and transaction ID to that exchange and to IC3 (ic3.gov) as fast as you can. Be very wary of "recovery agents" who contact you promising to get your crypto back; that is almost always a second scam targeting victims.
Is stakes.blog a Ponzi scheme or a real crypto investment?
Signals point to a high-risk crypto scam rather than a genuine platform. Warning signs we look for — guaranteed or unrealistic returns, pressure to deposit quickly, fake celebrity or exchange endorsements, and demands to send crypto to a wallet you don't control — are hallmarks of Ponzi-style and "pig-butchering" fraud. A real platform never guarantees profits, and no legitimate service asks you to send crypto to "unlock" a withdrawal.
How do I report stakes.blog?
You can report stakes.blog through several official channels: the U.S. FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov, the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) at ic3.gov, and — in the UK — Action Fraud at actionfraud.police.uk. You can also flag it to Google Safe Browsing (safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish) so other browsers warn about it, and report it to the company being impersonated if there is one. Reporting helps get scam sites taken down faster.
stakes.blog looks professional — how can it still be a scam?
Modern scams are built to look convincing. A valid SSL padlock, a polished template, stock photos, fake reviews, and a trust badge can all be added in minutes and prove nothing about who runs the site. Scammers buy cheap domains, clone real designs, and copy legal pages wholesale. That's exactly why an automated review that checks the domain's age, hosting, blacklists, and behaviour — rather than just how the page looks — is more reliable than a first impression.
Has stakes.blog been flagged by antivirus engines?
Yes. 1 of 95 antivirus and blocklist engines in our malware network flagged stakes.blog, 1 of them as outright malicious. Even a single detection from a reputable engine is a meaningful warning, and multiple detections rarely happen by accident.
Is stakes.blog on any phishing or malware blacklists?
No — stakes.blog is not currently on the major browser blocklist feeds that Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Edge rely on. Note that blocklists can lag behind brand-new scam domains, so "not listed" is reassuring but not a guarantee on its own.
How old is the stakes.blog domain?
stakes.blog is 3 days old, registered on August 5, 2026 through Dynadot LLC. Scam sites are very often freshly registered and short-lived, so an age under six months is a reason for extra caution.
Where is stakes.blog hosted?
stakes.blog resolves to an IP operated by Brander Group Inc. in US (Content Delivery Network). Hosting location alone doesn't make a site good or bad — but hosting that doesn't match a brand's claimed country, or that sits on networks known for abuse, is one of the many signals we weigh alongside the verdict above.
How often is the stakes.blog report updated?
This report is a record of the scan run on August 9, 2026, and the verdict reflects that point in time. Scam sites change fast — they can go live, get flagged, or vanish within days — so if you believe something about stakes.blog has changed, MalwareTips staff can run a fresh scan that re-checks every signal from scratch and republishes an updated verdict.

08 · Final Verdict

Final verdict

The saved conclusion, decisive evidence, and practical action in one final view.
Verdict score
12/100
Dangerous

New domain uses fake Stake airdrop to harvest wallet approvals

Saved capturestakes.blogCapture-safe
Captured during this scan. Opening this report does not revisit the site.
Conclusion

stakes.blog is a three-day-old site that presents itself as an educational portal about crypto security while directing visitors to connect non-custodial wallets under the pretext of claiming a 120-million-token airdrop. The page explicitly warns there is no verified official distribution yet still prompts users to approve wallet signatures, a classic drainer pattern.

Recommended actionDo not visit the site or connect any wallet. The combination of a brand-new domain, an unverified airdrop claim, and explicit wallet-approval prompts indicates a high likelihood of asset theft.
Saved evidence only

Missing checks are never treated as a clean result.

Scan another URL
Continue toCommunity

09 · Community

Community

First-hand experiences add human context after the scanner has reached its conclusion.