Is store.workshopcosmeticreview.com safe?
http://store.workshopcosmeticreview.com/
Coveragepartial2 of 4 applicable core capabilities
store.workshopcosmeticreview.com is flagged as phishing by many security engines
The site could not be opened for review, so its purpose is unknown. Twelve antivirus families have flagged it as adverse, and outside checking services list it as phishing or give it a zero trust score. That combination puts it in the Dangerous band, although the antivirus data is a saved, older observation.
Be the first to review store.workshopcosmeticreview.com
Lost money to store.workshopcosmeticreview.com? Warn others
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
The site could not be opened for review, so its purpose is unknown. Twelve antivirus families have flagged it as adverse, and outside checking services list it as phishing or give it a zero trust score. That combination puts it in the Dangerous band, although the antivirus data is a saved, older observation.
Security detections and outside warnings
Twelve independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. The data is saved and may be stale, so the timing should be confirmed, but the detections are treated as real.
ScamLens reports strong risk signals, PCrisk categorises the domain as Phishing, and an independent site-rating service gives it a Trust Score of 0. These are warnings from third-party checkers, not confirmed victim accounts.
What we could not verify
The connection to the site was refused, so we never saw its pages, contact details or policies. We cannot say what it sells or asks visitors to do. The browser threat feed showed no warning, but that does not outweigh the multi-vendor detections. The saved TLS check also did not validate the connection. The registrable domain is 157 days old.
Why the score is 12
12 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
14/ 93
detectionsSaved analysis from October 2, 2026 - stale
14 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 14
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 93
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| ADMINUSLabsMalicious | malicious |
| alphaMountain.aiMalicious | phishing |
| BitDefenderMalicious | phishing |
| ESETMalicious | phishing |
| Forcepoint ThreatSeekerMalicious | phishing |
| FortinetMalicious | phishing |
| G-DataMalicious | phishing |
| GridinsoftMalicious | phishing |
| KasperskyMalicious | phishing |
| LionicMalicious | phishing |
| RisingMalicious | phishing |
| SophosMalicious | phishing |
| VIPREMalicious | phishing |
| WebrootMalicious | malicious |
All 93 engine results
- ADMINUSLabs - Malicious
- alphaMountain.ai - phishing - Malicious
- BitDefender - phishing - Malicious
- ESET - phishing - Malicious
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - phishing - Malicious
- Fortinet - phishing - Malicious
- G-Data - phishing - Malicious
- Gridinsoft - phishing - Malicious
- Kaspersky - phishing - Malicious
- Lionic - phishing - Malicious
- Rising - phishing - Malicious
- Sophos - phishing - Malicious
- VIPRE - phishing - Malicious
- Webroot - Malicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- Cluster25 - Unrated
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
No page claim could be verified for store.workshopcosmeticreview.com because no usable page content or saved capture was available.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
3 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
2 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
Phishing & Impersonation
Service and business model
Unknown
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 0112 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
- 023 independent sources carry complaints or warnings about this site, including: "This domain already shows strong risk signals."
- 033 independent sources carry complaints or warnings about this site, including: "Category: Phishing"
Web research findings
Independent findings for store.workshopcosmeticreview.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainstore.workshopcosmeticreview.com
- Redirects tostore.workshopcosmeticreview.com
- Hosted byALEXHOST SRL
Domain Timeline
- May 14, 2026Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 5 months old when this review was saved.
- Oct 18, 2026Saved security review — Rated Dangerous
The completed checks from this saved scan are detailed above.
store.workshopcosmeticreview.com was registered very recently when this review was saved and was already flagged. Freshly-registered domains are disproportionately used for scams, and a young domain with active threat signals warrants extra caution.
Domain & Encryption
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentunavailable
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidenceunavailable
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
12 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
3 independent sources carry complaints or warnings about this site, including: "Category: Phishing" · 3 independent sources carry complaints or warnings about this site, including: "This domain already shows strong risk signals."
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 14 of 93 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · analysed Oct 2, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 18, 2026 |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | The saved page capture was not reliable enough to use | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Independent research | 3 independent findings were saved | Completed | Adverse | this scan · Oct 18, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result14 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionLimited
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Oct 2, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 18, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionUnavailable
- FindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- ResultThe saved page capture was not reliable enough to use
- CompletionUnavailable
- FindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Independent research
- Result3 independent findings were saved
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 18, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is store.workshopcosmeticreview.com a scam or a legit website?
Is store.workshopcosmeticreview.com safe to use?
What should I do if I already gave my details to store.workshopcosmeticreview.com?
Can I get my money back from store.workshopcosmeticreview.com?
Did store.workshopcosmeticreview.com steal my password or personal information?
How do I report store.workshopcosmeticreview.com?
Why does store.workshopcosmeticreview.com look legitimate if it's a scam?
Has store.workshopcosmeticreview.com been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is store.workshopcosmeticreview.com on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the store.workshopcosmeticreview.com domain?
Where is store.workshopcosmeticreview.com hosted?
How often is the store.workshopcosmeticreview.com report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
store.workshopcosmeticreview.com is flagged as phishing by many security engines
The written conclusion remains part of the saved report.
The site could not be opened for review, so its purpose is unknown. Twelve antivirus families have flagged it as adverse, and outside checking services list it as phishing or give it a zero trust score. That combination puts it in the Dangerous band, although the antivirus data is a saved, older observation.
09 · Community