Is stun.voipbuster.com safe?
http://stun.voipbuster.com/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: partial · 2 of 4 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (59 of 93 engines answered) · saved result: did not fully complete
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading · not available: did not fully complete
- page capture · not available: did not fully complete
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
stun.voipbuster.com is a VoIP network utility, not a website — but its parent service carries an independent review platform scam warning
stun.voipbuster.com is not a web storefront or content site. It is a STUN (Session Traversal Utilities for NAT) server — a background network component that VoIP apps query to work out how to route calls through home routers. A normal browser visit fails with a connection-refused error, which is expected for this kind of service, and means the site's own page, contact, About and policy text was never reviewed. The domain itself is long-established (7896 days old) and the browser threat feed returned no threat warning, but one antivirus family flagged it as a known infection source in a stale report, and the parent VoipBuster service has drawn a public scam accusation on an independent review platform. Because the operator's own pages could not be read and the reputation evidence is adverse, this sits in the Moderate Risk band rather than Safe.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 62/100
Moderate Risk covers scores 45–69. 2 findings pulled the score down; 2 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- Strong1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
- ModerateOne customer complaint on a public review site: "Scammers Avoid VoipBuster, MobileVoIP, FreeCall.com, and Dellmont B.V. at all costs! These scammers take your money, then refuse to provide proper service or…"
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe registrable domain is 7896 days old, indicating a long-established registration.
- SupportsThe browser threat feed returned no threat warning for the domain.
No points per finding are stored for this report: our analysis weighed all findings together to set the score. Each finding shows its saved severity instead (Decisive, Strong, Moderate or Minor). Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
stun.voipbuster.com is not a web storefront or content site. It is a STUN (Session Traversal Utilities for NAT) server — a background network component that VoIP apps query to work out how to route calls through home routers. A normal browser visit fails with a connection-refused error, which is expected for this kind of service, and means the site's own page, contact, About and policy text was never reviewed. The domain itself is long-established (7896 days old) and the browser threat feed returned no threat warning, but one antivirus family flagged it as a known infection source in a stale report, and the parent VoipBuster service has drawn a public scam accusation on an independent review platform. Because the operator's own pages could not be read and the reputation evidence is adverse, this sits in the Moderate Risk band rather than Safe.
A network utility, not a browsable site
The address does not serve a normal web page. Attempting to load it returned a connection-refused error, so the site's own page, contact, About and policy text was never reviewed. That is consistent with a STUN server, which answers small network queries from VoIP software rather than rendering content for visitors.
The registrable domain is 7896 days old, which is a long-standing registration and a supportive context signal — it argues against a throwaway or freshly registered host. The browser threat feed also returned no threat warning at the time of the check.
Clean technical checks do not clear the operator
One independent antivirus family reported an adverse result, naming the domain as a known infection source. The saved observation is stale, so the timing is uncertain, and a public STUN server used by many VoIP projects can attract false positives or historical abuse of shared infrastructure. It is a real detection, but not proof of current malicious behaviour.
The more relevant adverse evidence concerns the parent service. A public review page accuses VoipBuster, MobileVoIP, FreeCall.com and Dellmont B.V. of taking money and then refusing proper service or support, and urges users to avoid them. That is a customer-facing complaint about the operator behind this infrastructure, not about the STUN endpoint itself.
The saved TLS check did not validate the connection, which is unsurprising for a host that refuses plain web connections. None of these technical results establish that the operator is safe or unsafe on their own.
Why the score is 62
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
1/ 93
detectionsSaved analysis from October 15, 2026 - stale
1 engine flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 1
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 93
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| Dr.WebMalicious | malicious |
All 93 engine results
- Dr.Web - Malicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- alphaMountain.aiInformation Technology, Telephony
- BitDefenderim
- Dr.Webknown infection source
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekerinformation technology
- Sophosinformation technology
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
No page claim could be verified for stun.voipbuster.com because no usable page content or saved capture was available.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
1 external finding was saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
2 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
Web research findings
Independent findings for stun.voipbuster.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- Trustpilotopen
"Scammers Avoid VoipBuster, MobileVoIP, FreeCall.com, and Dellmont B.V. at all costs! These scammers take your money, then refuse to provide proper service or support."
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainstun.voipbuster.com
- Redirects tostun.voipbuster.com
- Hosted bySolaris Systems BV
Domain Timeline
- Mar 7, 2005Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 21 years old when this review was saved.
- Oct 19, 2026Saved security review — Rated Moderate Risk
The evidence in this saved scan is mixed or incomplete; the completed checks are detailed above.
Domain & Encryption
Cloudflare DNS is used by legitimate and scam sites alike, so it does not identify who runs the site.
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentunavailable
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidenceunavailable
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
One customer complaint on a public review site: "Scammers Avoid VoipBuster, MobileVoIP, FreeCall.com, and Dellmont B.V. at all costs! These scammers take your money, then refuse to provide proper service or…"
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 1 of 93 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · analysed Oct 15, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | The saved page capture was not reliable enough to use | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Independent research | 1 independent finding was saved | Completed | Adverse | this scan · Oct 19, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result1 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionLimitedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Oct 15, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 19, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionUnavailableFindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- ResultThe saved page capture was not reliable enough to use
- CompletionUnavailableFindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Independent research
- Result1 independent finding was saved
- CompletionCompletedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 19, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is stun.voipbuster.com a scam or is it safe?
Is stun.voipbuster.com safe to use?
Has stun.voipbuster.com been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is stun.voipbuster.com on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the stun.voipbuster.com domain?
Does stun.voipbuster.com have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is stun.voipbuster.com hosted?
How often is the stun.voipbuster.com report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
stun.voipbuster.com is a VoIP network utility, not a website — but its parent service carries an independent review platform scam warning
The written conclusion remains part of the saved report.
stun.voipbuster.com is not a web storefront or content site. It is a STUN (Session Traversal Utilities for NAT) server — a background network component that VoIP apps query to work out how to route calls through home routers. A normal browser visit fails with a connection-refused error, which is expected for this kind of service, and means the site's own page, contact, About and policy text was never reviewed. The domain itself is long-established (7896 days old) and the browser threat feed returned no threat warning, but one antivirus family flagged it as a known infection source in a stale report, and the parent VoipBuster service has drawn a public scam accusation on an independent review platform. Because the operator's own pages could not be read and the reputation evidence is adverse, this sits in the Moderate Risk band rather than Safe.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of stun.voipbuster.com?Verify and reply