Is suj.nu safe?
http://suj.nu/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: partial · 4 of 6 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (60 of 92 engines answered) · saved result: did not fully complete
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading · not available: did not fully complete
- page capture · not available: did not fully complete
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
Adult video site with an unreviewable homepage, a stale antivirus flag and no verified operator identity
suj.nu presents itself as a free online adult video site, and independent research describes it as a place to watch adult videos online for free. The domain's registration record shows it was created in April 2018, so it is not a brand-new throwaway domain, and the browser threat feed returned no threat warning. However, the site's own pages could not be captured during this scan, so its homepage, contact details, About text and policies were never reviewed, and the only saved antivirus observation is a stale one in which one engine family reported an adverse result. No fraud, payment or non-delivery evidence was found, so this is not a scam verdict — but the combination of unreadable content, an unresolved antivirus flag and an unverified operator keeps it out of the Safe and Low Risk bands.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 62/100
Moderate Risk covers scores 45–69. 3 findings pulled the score down; 2 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- Strong1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
- MinorThe site's own page, contact, About and policy text was never reviewed because the capture failed with a socket hang up.
- MinorThe saved TLS check did not validate the connection and the scanned address was served over plain HTTP.
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe registration record shows the domain was created on 20 April 2018, so it is not a newly registered throwaway domain.
- SupportsThe browser threat feed returned no threat warning for the address.
No points per finding are stored for this report: our analysis weighed all findings together to set the score. Each finding shows its saved severity instead (Decisive, Strong, Moderate or Minor). Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
suj.nu presents itself as a free online adult video site, and independent research describes it as a place to watch adult videos online for free. The domain's registration record shows it was created in April 2018, so it is not a brand-new throwaway domain, and the browser threat feed returned no threat warning. However, the site's own pages could not be captured during this scan, so its homepage, contact details, About text and policies were never reviewed, and the only saved antivirus observation is a stale one in which one engine family reported an adverse result. No fraud, payment or non-delivery evidence was found, so this is not a scam verdict — but the combination of unreadable content, an unresolved antivirus flag and an unverified operator keeps it out of the Safe and Low Risk bands.
What the site is and what could be verified
The site is described in independent research as a free online adult video destination, and a traffic record shows it drew roughly 62,000 visits in September 2026, which is consistent with a real, actively used adult content site rather than a parked placeholder.
The registration record for the domain shows a creation date of 20 April 2018, so the domain has existed for years; the 116-day figure in the scan data reflects the current registration window, not the site's history. The browser threat feed returned no threat warning for the address.
Unresolved checks that keep the score out of the safe bands
The site's own page, contact, About and policy text could not be reviewed because the capture failed with a socket hang up. That means nothing on the site itself — its ownership claims, its terms, its advertising or its download behaviour — could be confirmed in this scan.
The only saved antivirus observation is a stale one in which one engine family reported an adverse result, attributed to the site's adult content classification. It is a real detection record but not a fresh check, and it is not corroborated by Safe Browsing. The saved TLS check also did not validate the connection, and the scanned address was served over plain HTTP.
Why the score is 62
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
2/ 92
detectionsSaved analysis from October 3, 2026 - stale
2 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 1
- Suspicious
- 1
- Total
- 92
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| CRDFMalicious | malicious |
| GridinsoftSuspicious | suspicious |
All 92 engine results
- CRDF - Malicious
- Gridinsoft - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- alphaMountain.aiPornography
- BitDefenderporn
- Dr.Webadult content
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekersex
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Independent evidence classifies the site as content, but the page's own claim could not be captured.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
3 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
2 of the 6 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Content
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01The site's own page, contact, About and policy text was never reviewed because the capture failed with a socket hang up.
- 021 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
- 03The browser threat feed returned no threat warning for the address.
Web research findings
Independent findings for suj.nu, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for suj.nu. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainsuj.nu
- Redirects tosuj.nu
- Hosted byTeam Internet AG
Domain Timeline
- Jul 6, 2026Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 3 months old when this review was saved.
- Oct 30, 2026Saved security review — Rated Moderate Risk
The evidence in this saved scan is mixed or incomplete; the completed checks are detailed above.
suj.nu was registered very recently when this review was saved. Freshly-registered domains are disproportionately used for scams, so a young domain whose evidence is mixed or incomplete warrants extra caution.
Domain & Encryption
A shared content-delivery network address answers for many sites, so it is not the site's own server and says nothing about who runs it.
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentunavailable
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidenceunavailable
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing. · The saved TLS check did not validate the connection and the scanned address was served over plain HTTP.
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
The site's own page, contact, About and policy text was never reviewed because the capture failed with a socket hang up.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 2 of 92 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · analysed Oct 3, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 30, 2026 |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | The saved page capture was not reliable enough to use | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Independent research | 3 independent findings were saved | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 30, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result2 of 92 engines flagged
- CompletionLimitedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Oct 3, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 30, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionUnavailableFindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- ResultThe saved page capture was not reliable enough to use
- CompletionUnavailableFindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Independent research
- Result3 independent findings were saved
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 30, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is suj.nu a scam or is it safe?
Is suj.nu safe to use?
Has suj.nu been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is suj.nu on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the suj.nu domain?
Does suj.nu have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is suj.nu hosted?
How often is the suj.nu report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Adult video site with an unreviewable homepage, a stale antivirus flag and no verified operator identity
The written conclusion remains part of the saved report.
suj.nu presents itself as a free online adult video site, and independent research describes it as a place to watch adult videos online for free. The domain's registration record shows it was created in April 2018, so it is not a brand-new throwaway domain, and the browser threat feed returned no threat warning. However, the site's own pages could not be captured during this scan, so its homepage, contact details, About text and policies were never reviewed, and the only saved antivirus observation is a stale one in which one engine family reported an adverse result. No fraud, payment or non-delivery evidence was found, so this is not a scam verdict — but the combination of unreadable content, an unresolved antivirus flag and an unverified operator keeps it out of the Safe and Low Risk bands.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of suj.nu?Verify and reply