Is to.indeed.com safe?
http://to.indeed.com/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: partial · 4 of 6 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (60 of 92 engines answered) · saved result: did not fully complete
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading · not available: did not fully complete
- page capture · limited: did not fully complete
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
to.indeed.com is a subdomain of the real Indeed job site, but its own page could not be reviewed
The host belongs to indeed.com, a domain registered about 10,000 days ago. The scanner was blocked with HTTP 403 and saw only a 'Request Blocked' page, so the site's own pages could not be reviewed. Research found that a similar Indeed subdomain, t.indeed.com, has been used in redirect-based phishing. No evidence shows that to.indeed.com itself is malicious, so the score is moderate.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 62/100
Moderate Risk covers scores 45–69. 1 finding pulled the score down; 3 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- ModerateOne public warning on a scam-warning or security site: "The subdomain ‘t.indeed.com’ is supplied with parameters to redirect the client to another target (example.com) as shown in the example below. The parameters…"-33 pts
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe parent domain indeed.com is long established.
- SupportsThe browser threat feed returned no threat warning
- SupportsThe saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection
Points come from the saved evidence ledger: it lowered the score from 95 to 62 and split those 33 points between the findings that show points; the others carry no points in the ledger. Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
The host belongs to indeed.com, a domain registered about 10,000 days ago. The scanner was blocked with HTTP 403 and saw only a 'Request Blocked' page, so the site's own pages could not be reviewed. Research found that a similar Indeed subdomain, t.indeed.com, has been used in redirect-based phishing. No evidence shows that to.indeed.com itself is malicious, so the score is moderate.
Technical checks versus redirect abuse risk
The browser threat feed returned no warning and the TLS check found a valid encrypted connection. These results mean no detections, not that the host is safe.
Research describes the related subdomain t.indeed.com accepting a target parameter that redirects visitors to another destination. That pattern can make a link look trustworthy while it leads elsewhere. The evidence concerns t.indeed.com, not to.indeed.com directly.
What a visitor actually sees
The page showed a 'Request Blocked' message and could not be read, so no content, forms or purchase flow were observed.
Why the score is 62
One public warning on a scam-warning or security site: "The subdomain ‘t.indeed.com’ is supplied with parameters to redirect the client to another target (example.com) as shown in the example below. The parameters…". Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
0/ 92
No detectionsSaved analysis from June 20, 2026 - stale
No detections across 60 engines that rated this URL
No antivirus engine that answered raised an adverse result; 32 had no rating for this URL. This is one signal, not a guarantee.
- Malicious
- 0
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 92
All 92 engine results
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Unrated
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Clean
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- Cluster25 - Unrated
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Clean
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- BitDefenderjobsearch
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekerjob search
- Googlejobs
- Sophosjob search
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Visual context from the captured page
Request Blocked
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Request Blocked
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Independent evidence classifies the site as content, but the page's own claim could not be captured.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
1 external finding was saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
2 of the 6 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Content
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01One public warning on a scam-warning or security site: "The subdomain ‘t.indeed.com’ is supplied with parameters to redirect the client to another target (example.com) as shown in the example below. The parameters…"
- 02The parent domain indeed.com is long established.
- 03The page was blocked and its content was not reviewed.
Web research findings
Independent findings for to.indeed.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- Menlo Securityopen
"The subdomain ‘t.indeed.com’ is supplied with parameters to redirect the client to another target (example.com) as shown in the example below. The parameters in the URL that follow the “?” are a combination of parameters unique to indeed.com and the target parameter whose argument consists of the destination URL. Hence the user upon clicking the URL ends up getting redirected to example.com. In an actual attack, the user would be redirected to a phishing page."
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainto.indeed.com
- Redirects toto.indeed.com
- Hosted byCloudflare, Inc.
Domain Timeline
- Mar 30, 1998Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 28 years old when this review was saved.
- Oct 27, 2026Saved security review — Rated Moderate Risk
The evidence in this saved scan is mixed or incomplete; the completed checks are detailed above.
Domain & Encryption
Cloudflare DNS is used by legitimate and scam sites alike, so it does not identify who runs the site.
Certificate issued for to.indeed.com.
A shared Cloudflare address answers for many sites, so it is not the site's own server and says nothing about who runs it.
Redirect Chain
The site refused our redirect check, so this chain may be incomplete.
- 1301http://to.indeed.com/
- 2302https://to.indeed.com/
- 3403https://to.indeed.com/private/poodlepants/
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentunavailable
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencepartial
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
unknownMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
One public warning on a scam-warning or security site: "The subdomain ‘t.indeed.com’ is supplied with parameters to redirect the client to another target (example.com) as shown in the example below. The parameters…"
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 0 of 92 engines flagged | Limited | No saved finding | stale fallback · analysed Jun 20, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | The site showed a challenge page instead of its content; 1 visible observation saved | Limited | No saved finding | this scan · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Independent research | 1 independent finding was saved | Completed | Adverse | this scan · Oct 27, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result0 of 92 engines flagged
- CompletionLimitedFindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Jun 20, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 27, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionUnavailableFindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- ResultThe site showed a challenge page instead of its content; 1 visible observation saved
- CompletionLimitedFindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 27, 2026
- Independent research
- Result1 independent finding was saved
- CompletionCompletedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 27, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is to.indeed.com a scam or is it safe?
Is to.indeed.com safe to use?
Has to.indeed.com been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is to.indeed.com on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the to.indeed.com domain?
Does to.indeed.com have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is to.indeed.com hosted?
How often is the to.indeed.com report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
to.indeed.com is a subdomain of the real Indeed job site, but its own page could not be reviewed
The written conclusion remains part of the saved report.
The host belongs to indeed.com, a domain registered about 10,000 days ago. The scanner was blocked with HTTP 403 and saw only a 'Request Blocked' page, so the site's own pages could not be reviewed. Research found that a similar Indeed subdomain, t.indeed.com, has been used in redirect-based phishing. No evidence shows that to.indeed.com itself is malicious, so the score is moderate.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of to.indeed.com?Verify and reply