Is trzorlogin.gitbook.io safe?
http://trzorlogin.gitbook.io/
Trezor @Login GitBook subdomain flagged as phishing impersonation
trzorlogin.gitbook.io redirects to a GitBook-hosted page titled Trezor @Login that mimics official Trezor Suite update notices and branding. Four antivirus engines (Emsisoft, Kaspersky, Netcraft, Webroot) classify it as phishing. No direct credential fields observed on capture but the deceptive identity and update lure indicate high risk of wallet credential theft.
Read the full analysisLoading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
trzorlogin.gitbook.io redirects to a GitBook-hosted page titled Trezor @Login that mimics official Trezor Suite update notices and branding. Four antivirus engines (Emsisoft, Kaspersky, Netcraft, Webroot) classify it as phishing. No direct credential fields observed on capture but the deceptive identity and update lure indicate high risk of wallet credential theft.
What the site appears to do
Presents as Trezor hardware wallet documentation and login portal on a misspelled GitBook subdomain. Includes Trezor branding, Suite update claims (v22.9.3), and navigation mimicking official support content.
Strongest evidence and limitations
VirusTotal reports 4 malicious detections out of 92 engines with explicit phishing labels from Emsisoft, Kaspersky, Netcraft and Webroot. Google Safe Browsing returned no flag. TLS is valid and the IP shows low abuse history. No observed file downloads or credential forms on the captured page.
The subdomain spelling (trzorlogin) and GitBook hosting are common patterns in brand-impersonation campaigns but do not prove operator identity.
Practical user impact
Visiting risks exposure to phishing that could lead to loss of cryptocurrency funds. Users should only access Trezor services via official domains listed on trezor.io and never enter seed phrases or credentials on third-party sites.
Why the score is 10
4 independent antivirus familyies reported an adverse result. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
Fresh result
4 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 4
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 92
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| EmsisoftMalicious | phishing |
| KasperskyMalicious | phishing |
| NetcraftMalicious | malicious |
| WebrootMalicious | malicious |
All 92 engine results
- Emsisoft - phishing - Malicious
- Kaspersky - phishing - Malicious
- Netcraft - malicious - Malicious
- Webroot - malicious - Malicious
- 0xSI_f33d - unrated - Clean
- Abusix - clean - Clean
- Acronis - clean - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - clean - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - clean - Clean
- AlienVault - clean - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - unrated - Clean
- AlphaSOC - unrated - Clean
- Antiy-AVL - clean - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- AutoShun - unrated - Clean
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - unrated - Clean
- BitDefender - clean - Clean
- Bkav - unrated - Clean
- BlockList - clean - Clean
- Blueliv - clean - Clean
- Certego - clean - Clean
- ChainPatrol - clean - Clean
- Chong Lua Dao - clean - Clean
- CINS Army - clean - Clean
- Cluster25 - unrated - Clean
- CRDF - clean - Clean
- Criminal IP - unrated - Clean
- CSIS Security Group - unrated - Clean
- CTX AI - clean - Clean
- Cyan - unrated - Clean
- Cyble - clean - Clean
- CyRadar - clean - Clean
- desenmascara.me - clean - Clean
- DNS8 - unrated - Clean
- Dr.Web - clean - Clean
- EmergingThreats - clean - Clean
- Ermes - unrated - Clean
- ESET - clean - Clean
- ESTsecurity - clean - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - clean - Clean
- Fortinet - clean - Clean
- Fortra - unrated - Clean
- G-Data - clean - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- Google Safe Browsing - clean - Clean
- GreenSnow - clean - Clean
- GreyNoise - unrated - Clean
- Gridinsoft - unrated - Clean
- Guardpot - unrated - Clean
- Heimdal Security - clean - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- IPsum - clean - Clean
- Juniper Networks - clean - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - unrated - Clean
- LevelBlue - clean - Clean
- Lionic - clean - Clean
- Lumu - unrated - Clean
- Malwared - clean - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - clean - Clean
- MalwareURL - unrated - Clean
- Mimecast - unrated - Clean
- OpenPhish - clean - Clean
- PhishFort - unrated - Clean
- Phishing Database - clean - Clean
- Phishtank - clean - Clean
- PREBYTES - clean - Clean
- PrecisionSec - unrated - Clean
- Quick Heal - clean - Clean
- Quttera - clean - Clean
- Rising - clean - Clean
- SafeToOpen - unrated - Clean
- Sangfor - clean - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - unrated - Clean
- Scantitan - clean - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - clean - Clean
- Seclookup - clean - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - unrated - Clean
- SOCRadar - unrated - Clean
- Sophos - clean - Clean
- StopForumSpam - clean - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - clean - Clean
- ThreatHive - clean - Clean
- URLhaus - clean - Clean
- URLQuery - unrated - Clean
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - clean - Clean
- VIPRE - unrated - Clean
- ViriBack - clean - Clean
- VX Vault - clean - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - unrated - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - clean - Clean
- ZeroCERT - clean - Clean
- ZeroFox - unrated - Clean
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Captured during this scan in a safe sandbox. Opening this report does not revisit the site.
Visual context from the captured page
The saved image was reviewed for deceptive controls, visual impersonation, fake urgency, and other scam interface patterns.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
- 1
What the site claims
Trezor @Login | US
- 2
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 92 antivirus results.
- 3
What independent research found
The search completed without a material external warning or corroborating report.
- 4
What remains unverified
1 of the five core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
Phishing & Impersonation
Service and business model
Login Portal
Unknown
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 014 independent antivirus familyies reported an adverse result.
Web research findings
Independent findings for trzorlogin.gitbook.io, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for trzorlogin.gitbook.io. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
- No direct contact email found on the captured page.
Domain & Encryption
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://trzorlogin.gitbook.io/
- 2307https://trzorlogin.gitbook.io/
- 3302https://trzorlogin.gitbook.io/us/
- 4200https://trzorlogin.gitbook.io/us
Server Reputation
Referenced Domains
Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
Malware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
Additional evidence review
Operator / customer risk
Complaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 4 of 92 engines flagged | Completed | Adverse | fresh · Jul 31, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | The saved page capture contained descriptive context only | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Independent research | The search completed without a material external finding | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
- Page content
- Result: Page fetched · HTTP 200
- Completed
- No adverse finding
- Visual evidence
- Result: The saved page capture contained descriptive context only
- Completed
- No adverse finding
- Independent research
- Result: The search completed without a material external finding
- Completed
- No adverse finding
07 · Community
Community
08 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

0 community contributions
Share what happened, what the site requested, and what others should watch for.
Community reviews never change the scanner verdict.