Is vote-ev.click safe?
http://vote-ev.click/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: partial · 2 of 4 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (61 of 93 engines answered) · saved result: did not fully complete
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading · limited: did not fully complete
- page capture · not available: did not fully complete
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
vote-ev.click is a confirmed Google brand-impersonation phishing domain flagged by ten antivirus engines.
vote-ev.click is a 155-day-old domain that independent threat intelligence identifies as a confirmed brand-impersonation site targeting Google, and ten antivirus families have returned adverse results against it. The site itself could not be reached during review, so its own pages, contact details and policy text were never examined. Because the domain is a confirmed impersonation host with strong multi-vendor detections and no established reputation, it falls in the Dangerous band.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 12/100
Dangerous covers scores 1–20. 5 findings pulled the score down; 1 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- Decisive10 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
- ModerateOne public warning on a scam-warning or security site: "vote-ev.click: Confirmed Brand Impersonation Site"
- MinorThe domain is only 155 days old and was registered on 2026-05-21.
- MinorThe saved TLS check did not validate the connection
- MinorName-server configuration is shared with other domains including vote-base.sbs and vote-nu.rest.
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe browser threat feed returned no threat warning at check time.
No points per finding are stored for this report: our analysis weighed all findings together to set the score. Each finding shows its saved severity instead (Decisive, Strong, Moderate or Minor). Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
Lost money or shared details on vote-ev.click? Do this now
Act quickly: the first hours matter most for a chargeback.
- Call your bank or card issuer now
Ask them to dispute the charge or open a chargeback; the sooner you act, the better your odds. Card payments can often be reversed. Bank transfers and gift cards are harder, but report them to your bank too. Crypto payments usually cannot be reversed: report the wallet address and transaction ID to the exchange you sent from.
- Change any password you entered
If you entered a password on vote-ev.click, change it there and anywhere you reused it, and turn on two-factor authentication. Keep screenshots, order confirmations and messages as evidence.
- Report the site
Reports help get scam sites taken down faster and warn other people.
- Report the domain to its registrar
Dynadot, LLC registered this domain. ICANN's lookup shows the registrar's abuse contact.
- Ignore anyone offering to recover your money
"Recovery" services or agents who contact you, or ask for a fee up front, are almost always a second scam aimed at victims. Your bank's dispute process and the official reporting services never charge a fee in advance.
Full answers about refunds and reporting are in the Safety FAQ below.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
vote-ev.click is a 155-day-old domain that independent threat intelligence identifies as a confirmed brand-impersonation site targeting Google, and ten antivirus families have returned adverse results against it. The site itself could not be reached during review, so its own pages, contact details and policy text were never examined. Because the domain is a confirmed impersonation host with strong multi-vendor detections and no established reputation, it falls in the Dangerous band.
Confirmed brand impersonation and multi-vendor detections
Independent threat intelligence lists vote-ev.click as a confirmed brand-impersonation site, specifically targeting Google. That classification is a direct warning that the domain exists to imitate a trusted brand, which is the standard setup for credential harvesting or deceptive redirects.
Ten independent antivirus families reported an adverse result for this domain. The detection is a saved observation rather than a fresh submission, so the exact timing is uncertain, but the breadth of vendors agreeing on a malicious verdict is strong corroboration of the impersonation finding.
Clean transport checks do not offset the operator risk
The browser threat feed returned no threat warning, and the saved TLS check did not validate the connection. These are transport-level observations only; they mean no warning was present at check time, not that the site is safe. A phishing host can sit behind valid or invalid TLS and still harvest credentials.
The site's own page content could not be read because the request timed out with no HTTP response. That means the specific phishing mechanics, any login form, and any operator contact or policy text were never reviewed. The absence of page-level evidence does not clear the domain; it leaves the operator's intent unverified while the external impersonation finding stands.
Young domain sharing name-server infrastructure with related hosts
The registrable domain is 155 days old, and registration records show it was created on 2026-05-21. A very recent registration is consistent with a disposable phishing host rather than an established service.
Name-server records show vote-ev.click shares its configuration with other domains such as vote-base.sbs and vote-nu.rest. Shared infrastructure across a cluster of similarly named hosts is a pattern seen in coordinated phishing campaigns, though it is not by itself proof of a single operator.
Why the score is 12
10 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
15/ 93
detectionsSaved analysis from October 2, 2026 - stale
15 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 11
- Suspicious
- 4
- Total
- 93
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| alphaMountain.aiMalicious | phishing |
| BitDefenderMalicious | phishing |
| Chong Lua DaoMalicious | malicious |
| Forcepoint ThreatSeekerMalicious | phishing |
| G-DataMalicious | phishing |
| KasperskyMalicious | phishing |
| LionicMalicious | phishing |
| RisingMalicious | phishing |
| SophosMalicious | phishing |
| VIPREMalicious | phishing |
| Yandex SafebrowsingMalicious | phishing |
| ESETSuspicious | suspicious |
| FortinetSuspicious | spam |
| GridinsoftSuspicious | suspicious |
| LevelBlueSuspicious | suspicious |
All 93 engine results
- alphaMountain.ai - phishing - Malicious
- BitDefender - phishing - Malicious
- Chong Lua Dao - Malicious
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - phishing - Malicious
- G-Data - phishing - Malicious
- Kaspersky - phishing - Malicious
- Lionic - phishing - Malicious
- Rising - phishing - Malicious
- Sophos - phishing - Malicious
- VIPRE - phishing - Malicious
- Yandex Safebrowsing - phishing - Malicious
- ESET - Suspicious
- Fortinet - spam - Suspicious
- Gridinsoft - Suspicious
- LevelBlue - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Clean
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Unrated
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- alphaMountain.aiPhishing
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekerphishing and other frauds
- Sophosphishing and fraud
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
No page claim could be verified for vote-ev.click because no usable page content or saved capture was available.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
4 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
2 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
Phishing & Impersonation
Service and business model
Unknown
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01One public warning on a scam-warning or security site: "vote-ev.click: Confirmed Brand Impersonation Site"
- 0210 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
- 03The domain is only 155 days old and was registered on 2026-05-21.
Web research findings
Independent findings for vote-ev.click, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainvote-ev.click
- Redirects tovote-ev.click
- Hosted bySERV.HOST GROUP LTD
Domain Timeline
- May 21, 2026Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 5 months old when this review was saved.
- Oct 24, 2026Saved security review — Rated Dangerous
The completed checks from this saved scan are detailed above.
vote-ev.click was registered very recently when this review was saved and was already flagged. Freshly-registered domains are disproportionately used for scams, and a young domain with active threat signals warrants extra caution.
Domain & Encryption
Cloudflare DNS is used by legitimate and scam sites alike, so it does not identify who runs the site.
Server Reputation
Sites linked to this one
Other sites we have reports for that share something checkable with this one. A shared detail is a lead to compare, not proof that the sites have the same owner or the same risk; each keeps its own rating.
On the same server IP
Also served from 193.23.202.188 (SERV.HOST GROUP LTD). Unrelated sites can share a server, so this is a lead, not proof.
- vote-nu.restDangerous
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentpartial
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidenceunavailable
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
10 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing. · The domain is only 155 days old and was registered on 2026-05-21.
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
One public warning on a scam-warning or security site: "vote-ev.click: Confirmed Brand Impersonation Site"
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 15 of 93 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · analysed Oct 2, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 24, 2026 |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Limited | No saved finding | this scan · Oct 24, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | The saved page capture was not reliable enough to use | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Independent research | 4 independent findings were saved | Completed | Adverse | this scan · Oct 24, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result15 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionLimitedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Oct 2, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 24, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionLimitedFindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 24, 2026
- Visual evidence
- ResultThe saved page capture was not reliable enough to use
- CompletionUnavailableFindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Independent research
- Result4 independent findings were saved
- CompletionCompletedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 24, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is vote-ev.click a scam or a legit website?
Is vote-ev.click safe to use?
What should I do if I already gave my details to vote-ev.click?
Can I get my money back from vote-ev.click?
Did vote-ev.click steal my password or personal information?
How do I report vote-ev.click?
Why does vote-ev.click look legitimate if it's a scam?
Has vote-ev.click been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is vote-ev.click on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the vote-ev.click domain?
Where is vote-ev.click hosted?
How often is the vote-ev.click report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
vote-ev.click is a confirmed Google brand-impersonation phishing domain flagged by ten antivirus engines.
The written conclusion remains part of the saved report.
vote-ev.click is a 155-day-old domain that independent threat intelligence identifies as a confirmed brand-impersonation site targeting Google, and ten antivirus families have returned adverse results against it. The site itself could not be reached during review, so its own pages, contact details and policy text were never examined. Because the domain is a confirmed impersonation host with strong multi-vendor detections and no established reputation, it falls in the Dangerous band.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of vote-ev.click?Verify and reply