Is wikifeet.com safe?
http://wikifeet.com/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: strong · 4 of 6 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (59 of 93 engines answered) · saved result: did not fully complete
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading · limited: did not fully complete
- page capture: completed
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
wikiFeet is a long-established celebrity photo site with no detected malware or phishing, but user complaints describe heavy-handed moderation and content-ownership terms.
wikiFeet is a content site focused on celebrity foot imagery that has been online for many years. Technical checks found no malware or phishing indicators, and independent reviewers describe it as safe to access. The main concerns come from user reviews about strict moderation and terms that give the site control over uploaded content. There is no evidence of financial fraud, deceptive downloads, or payment traps.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 78/100
Low Risk covers scores 70–84. 1 finding pulled the score down; 5 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- ModerateOne customer complaint on a public review site: "Site rules are more like prison rules. Almost any comment will be flagged as inappropriate. You get banned from commenting"
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe domain is 6697 days old, indicating a long-established presence online.
- SupportsThe browser threat feed returned no threat warning for this site.
- SupportsThe saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection.
- SupportsAn independent reviewer considers the site legitimate and safe for consumers to access.
- SupportsA public record on a scam-warning or security site reads: "a long-term domain history (18.3 years)"
No points per finding are stored for this report: our analysis weighed all findings together to set the score. Each finding shows its saved severity instead (Decisive, Strong, Moderate or Minor). Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
wikiFeet is a content site focused on celebrity foot imagery that has been online for many years. Technical checks found no malware or phishing indicators, and independent reviewers describe it as safe to access. The main concerns come from user reviews about strict moderation and terms that give the site control over uploaded content. There is no evidence of financial fraud, deceptive downloads, or payment traps.
Technical checks show no active threats
The browser threat feed returned no threat warning for this site, and the saved TLS check confirmed a valid encrypted connection. The hosting IP has an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across zero saved reports, meaning no abuse has been recorded against the server hosting this domain.
Independent reviewers describe the site as legitimate and safe for consumers to access, and note its long-term domain history of over 18 years. The domain itself is 6697 days old, placing its registration in the mid-2000s.
User complaints focus on moderation and content ownership, not fraud
Two user reviews on an independent review platform describe dissatisfaction with the site's rules and moderation. One reviewer compares the site rules to prison rules and says almost any comment will be flagged as inappropriate, leading to bans from commenting. Another reviewer states that any content uploaded immediately becomes the site's content and the uploader no longer controls it.
These complaints describe policy and usability frustrations rather than financial scams, deceptive billing, or malware distribution. The site's own contact details were not reviewed because the page text was not read in full, so the operator's identity remains unverified from the site itself.
Why the score is 78
The saved checks found no material threat, but the evidence was not strong enough for the highest Safe tier. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
0/ 93
No detectionsSaved analysis from October 28, 2026 - stale
No detections across 59 engines that rated this URL
No antivirus engine that answered raised an adverse result; 34 had no rating for this URL. This is one signal, not a guarantee.
- Malicious
- 0
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 93
All 93 engine results
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- alphaMountain.aiAdult/Mature, Entertainment
- BitDefendermisc
- Dr.Webadult content
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekerlingerie and swimsuit
- Googlepornography
- Sophosentertainment
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
wikiFeet We use cookies
What the captured page showed
2 observations- 01
wikiFeet
- 02
We use cookies
What the page says about itself
What the site says about itself, quoted from the pages we read. The site wrote these words; they are not our findings.
- Page title
wikiFeet
- Meta description
The collaborative celebrity feet website
Pages we read
- Main page/Read
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
wikiFeet
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 59 antivirus results.
What independent research found
4 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
2 of the 6 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Content
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01The domain is 6697 days old, indicating a long-established presence online.
- 02The browser threat feed returned no threat warning for this site.
- 03The saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection.
Web research findings
Independent findings for wikifeet.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- Trustpilotopen
"Site rules are more like prison rules. Almost any comment will be flagged as inappropriate. You get banned from commenting"
- Trustpilotopen
"Any content you upload immediately becomes their content...and you no longer control it. Essentially...your control of the content is revoked by default immediately upon upload."
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainwikifeet.com
- Redirects towikifeet.com
- Hosted byCloudflare, Inc.
- Referencesfonts.googleapis.com · fonts.gstatic.com
Domain Timeline
- Jun 28, 2008Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 18 years old when this review was saved.
- Oct 30, 2026Saved security review — Rated Low Risk
This saved scan found no material threat, but the evidence was not strong enough for the highest Safe tier.
wikifeet.com has operated for years and this review found no material threat — a long track record, though it is never a guarantee on its own.
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
Domain & Encryption
Cloudflare DNS is used by legitimate and scam sites alike, so it does not identify who runs the site.
Certificate issued for wikifeet.com.
A shared Cloudflare address answers for many sites, so it is not the site's own server and says nothing about who runs it.
Analytics and ads
- Google Tag Manager
Scripts, fonts and CDNs
- Google Fonts
Payment providers the page loads
None seen among the outside domains we saved.
Read from the first 20 outside domains the page loads and the shop platform it uses; the web server and platform rows are under Hosting & Technology. A payment script on the page does not prove the shop accepts that method at checkout, or that you are protected.
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://wikifeet.com/
- 2200https://wikifeet.com/
Server Reputation
Referenced Domains
Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentpartial
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
unknownMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
One customer complaint on a public review site: "Site rules are more like prison rules. Almost any comment will be flagged as inappropriate. You get banned from commenting"
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 0 of 93 engines flagged | Limited | No saved finding | stale fallback · analysed Oct 28, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 30, 2026 |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Limited | No saved finding | this scan · Oct 30, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 2 visible observations saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 30, 2026 |
| Independent research | 4 independent findings were saved | Completed | Adverse | this scan · Oct 30, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result0 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionLimitedFindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Oct 28, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 30, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionLimitedFindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 30, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result2 visible observations saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 30, 2026
- Independent research
- Result4 independent findings were saved
- CompletionCompletedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 30, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is wikifeet.com a scam or is it safe?
Is wikifeet.com safe to use?
Has wikifeet.com been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is wikifeet.com on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the wikifeet.com domain?
Does wikifeet.com have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is wikifeet.com hosted?
Is wikifeet.com a well-known website?
How often is the wikifeet.com report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
wikiFeet is a long-established celebrity photo site with no detected malware or phishing, but user complaints describe heavy-handed moderation and content-ownership terms.
wikiFeet is a content site focused on celebrity foot imagery that has been online for many years. Technical checks found no malware or phishing indicators, and independent reviewers describe it as safe to access. The main concerns come from user reviews about strict moderation and terms that give the site control over uploaded content. There is no evidence of financial fraud, deceptive downloads, or payment traps.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of wikifeet.com?Verify and reply