Is wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd safe?
http://wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd/
Coveragecomplete3 of 4 applicable core capabilities
High risk: multiple security systems flag this domain
The domain's purpose and commercial model are unverified, but current scan evidence shows four malicious and three suspicious detections across 90 engines. A separate aggregate records adverse results from four antivirus families, supporting a High Risk rating despite one clean threat-list check.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
The domain's purpose and commercial model are unverified, but current scan evidence shows four malicious and three suspicious detections across 90 engines. A separate aggregate records adverse results from four antivirus families, supporting a High Risk rating despite one clean threat-list check.
Strong adverse security signals
Current evidence records seven adverse detections—four malicious and three suspicious—among 90 scanning engines.
The adverse assessment is not confined to one result: four independent antivirus families also reported the domain.
The exact threat mechanism remains unconfirmed
Another security report classifies the site as suspicious and notes seven blacklist detections, but the supplied evidence does not establish a specific phishing, malware, or commercial-deception flow.
One major browser threat list returned no warning. That is meaningful counterevidence, but it does not outweigh the multiple adverse detections or establish that the operator and site are safe.
Why the score is 34
Four independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
7/ 90
detectionsFresh result
7 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 4
- Suspicious
- 3
- Total
- 90
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| Chong Lua DaoMalicious | malicious |
| SeclookupMalicious | malicious |
| VIPREMalicious | malware |
| WebrootMalicious | malicious |
| CertegoSuspicious | suspicious |
| FortinetSuspicious | spam |
| GridinsoftSuspicious | suspicious |
All 90 engine results
- Chong Lua Dao - malicious - Malicious
- Seclookup - malicious - Malicious
- VIPRE - malware - Malicious
- Webroot - malicious - Malicious
- Certego - suspicious - Suspicious
- Fortinet - spam - Suspicious
- Gridinsoft - suspicious - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - unrated - Clean
- Abusix - clean - Clean
- Acronis - clean - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - clean - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - clean - Clean
- AlienVault - clean - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - clean - Clean
- AlphaSOC - unrated - Clean
- Antiy-AVL - clean - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- AutoShun - unrated - Clean
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - unrated - Clean
- BitDefender - clean - Clean
- Bkav - unrated - Clean
- BlockList - clean - Clean
- Blueliv - clean - Clean
- ChainPatrol - unrated - Clean
- CINS Army - clean - Clean
- CRDF - clean - Clean
- Criminal IP - unrated - Clean
- CSIS Security Group - unrated - Clean
- CTX AI - clean - Clean
- Cyan - unrated - Clean
- Cyble - clean - Clean
- CyRadar - clean - Clean
- desenmascara.me - clean - Clean
- DNS8 - unrated - Clean
- Dr.Web - clean - Clean
- EmergingThreats - clean - Clean
- Emsisoft - clean - Clean
- Ermes - unrated - Clean
- ESET - clean - Clean
- ESTsecurity - clean - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - unrated - Clean
- Fortra - unrated - Clean
- G-Data - clean - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- Google Safe Browsing - clean - Clean
- GreenSnow - clean - Clean
- GreyNoise - unrated - Clean
- Guardpot - unrated - Clean
- Heimdal Security - clean - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- IPsum - clean - Clean
- Juniper Networks - clean - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - unrated - Clean
- Kaspersky - unrated - Clean
- LevelBlue - clean - Clean
- Lionic - clean - Clean
- Lumu - unrated - Clean
- Malwared - clean - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - clean - Clean
- MalwareURL - unrated - Clean
- Mimecast - unrated - Clean
- Netcraft - unrated - Clean
- OpenPhish - clean - Clean
- PhishFort - unrated - Clean
- Phishtank - clean - Clean
- PREBYTES - clean - Clean
- PrecisionSec - unrated - Clean
- Quick Heal - clean - Clean
- Quttera - clean - Clean
- Rising - clean - Clean
- SafeToOpen - unrated - Clean
- Sangfor - clean - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - unrated - Clean
- Scantitan - clean - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - clean - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - unrated - Clean
- SOCRadar - unrated - Clean
- Sophos - clean - Clean
- StopForumSpam - clean - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - clean - Clean
- ThreatHive - clean - Clean
- URLhaus - clean - Clean
- URLQuery - unrated - Clean
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - clean - Clean
- ViriBack - clean - Clean
- VX Vault - clean - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - clean - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - clean - Clean
- ZeroCERT - clean - Clean
- ZeroFox - unrated - Clean
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
No page claim could be verified for wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd because no usable page content or saved capture was available.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
2 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
1 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
Web research findings
Independent findings for wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- Gridinsoftopen
"Gridinsoft currently classifies this site as Suspicious Website. The report highlights 7 blacklist detections"
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainwk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd
- Redirects towk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd
- Hosted byServers.com, Inc.
Domain Timeline
- Mar 23, 2026Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 6 months old today.
- Sep 8, 2026Saved security review — Flagged as suspicious
The completed checks from this saved scan are detailed above.
wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd was registered very recently and is already flagged. Freshly-registered domains are disproportionately used for scams, and a young domain with active threat signals warrants extra caution.
Domain & Encryption
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruscomplete
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentpartial
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidenceunavailable
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
Additional evidence review · Additional evidence review
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
Additional evidence review
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 7 of 90 engines flagged | Completed | Adverse | fresh · Sep 8, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Limited | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | The saved page capture was not reliable enough to use | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Independent research | 2 independent findings were saved | Completed | Adverse | Not available |
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionLimited
- FindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- ResultThe saved page capture was not reliable enough to use
- CompletionUnavailable
- FindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Independent research
- Result2 independent findings were saved
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- FreshnessNot available
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd a scam or a legit website?
Is wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd safe to use?
What should I do if I already gave my details to wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd?
Can I get my money back from wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd?
Is my device at risk after visiting wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd?
How do I report wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd?
Why does wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd look legitimate if it's a scam?
Has wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd domain?
Does wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd have a valid SSL certificate?
How often is the wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
High risk: multiple security systems flag this domain
The written conclusion remains part of the saved report.
The domain's purpose and commercial model are unverified, but current scan evidence shows four malicious and three suspicious detections across 90 engines. A separate aggregate records adverse results from four antivirus families, supporting a High Risk rating despite one clean threat-list check.
09 · Community