Is wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd safe?

http://wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd/

High RiskStatus

Coveragecomplete3 of 4 applicable core capabilities

Verdict

High risk: multiple security systems flag this domain

The domain's purpose and commercial model are unverified, but current scan evidence shows four malicious and three suspicious detections across 90 engines. A separate aggregate records adverse results from four antivirus families, supporting a High Risk rating despite one clean threat-list check.

Avoid visiting the domain or entering information unless its purpose and safety can be independently verified; multiple current security detections warrant caution.
Read full analysis
No saved capture is availableThe verdict remains based on the completed checks below.
7 antivirus engines flagged this URLChong Lua Dao, Seclookup, VIPRE, Webroot, Certego
Calibrated safety spectrum

Where this site sits

  1. Dangerous1–20
  2. High Risk21–44
  3. Moderate Risk45–69
  4. Low Risk70–84
  5. Safe85–100

The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.

01 · Investigation Brief

Investigation Brief

The domain's purpose and commercial model are unverified, but current scan evidence shows four malicious and three suspicious detections across 90 engines. A separate aggregate records adverse results from four antivirus families, supporting a High Risk rating despite one clean threat-list check.

Strong adverse security signals

Current evidence records seven adverse detections—four malicious and three suspicious—among 90 scanning engines.

The adverse assessment is not confined to one result: four independent antivirus families also reported the domain.

The exact threat mechanism remains unconfirmed

Another security report classifies the site as suspicious and notes seven blacklist detections, but the supplied evidence does not establish a specific phishing, malware, or commercial-deception flow.

One major browser threat list returned no warning. That is meaningful counterevidence, but it does not outweigh the multiple adverse detections or establish that the operator and site are safe.

Why the score is 34

Four independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.

02 · Security Evidence

Security evidence

Collected signals and independent provider data for this URL.

Antivirus Engines

7/ 90

detections

Fresh result

7 engines flagged this URL

Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.

Malicious
4
Suspicious
3
Total
90
Adverse antivirus results
EngineFinding
Chong Lua DaoMaliciousmalicious
SeclookupMaliciousmalicious
VIPREMaliciousmalware
WebrootMaliciousmalicious
CertegoSuspicioussuspicious
FortinetSuspiciousspam
GridinsoftSuspicioussuspicious
All 90 engine results
  • Chong Lua Dao - malicious - Malicious
  • Seclookup - malicious - Malicious
  • VIPRE - malware - Malicious
  • Webroot - malicious - Malicious
  • Certego - suspicious - Suspicious
  • Fortinet - spam - Suspicious
  • Gridinsoft - suspicious - Suspicious
  • 0xSI_f33d - unrated - Clean
  • Abusix - clean - Clean
  • Acronis - clean - Clean
  • ADMINUSLabs - clean - Clean
  • AILabs (MONITORAPP) - clean - Clean
  • AlienVault - clean - Clean
  • alphaMountain.ai - clean - Clean
  • AlphaSOC - unrated - Clean
  • Antiy-AVL - clean - Clean
  • ArcSight Threat Intelligence - unrated - Clean
  • AutoShun - unrated - Clean
  • Bfore.Ai PreCrime - unrated - Clean
  • BitDefender - clean - Clean
  • Bkav - unrated - Clean
  • BlockList - clean - Clean
  • Blueliv - clean - Clean
  • ChainPatrol - unrated - Clean
  • CINS Army - clean - Clean
  • CRDF - clean - Clean
  • Criminal IP - unrated - Clean
  • CSIS Security Group - unrated - Clean
  • CTX AI - clean - Clean
  • Cyan - unrated - Clean
  • Cyble - clean - Clean
  • CyRadar - clean - Clean
  • desenmascara.me - clean - Clean
  • DNS8 - unrated - Clean
  • Dr.Web - clean - Clean
  • EmergingThreats - clean - Clean
  • Emsisoft - clean - Clean
  • Ermes - unrated - Clean
  • ESET - clean - Clean
  • ESTsecurity - clean - Clean
  • Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - unrated - Clean
  • Fortra - unrated - Clean
  • G-Data - clean - Clean
  • GCP Abuse Intelligence - unrated - Clean
  • Google Safe Browsing - clean - Clean
  • GreenSnow - clean - Clean
  • GreyNoise - unrated - Clean
  • Guardpot - unrated - Clean
  • Heimdal Security - clean - Clean
  • Hunt.io Intelligence - unrated - Clean
  • IPsum - clean - Clean
  • Juniper Networks - clean - Clean
  • K7AntiVirus - unrated - Clean
  • Kaspersky - unrated - Clean
  • LevelBlue - clean - Clean
  • Lionic - clean - Clean
  • Lumu - unrated - Clean
  • Malwared - clean - Clean
  • MalwarePatrol - clean - Clean
  • MalwareURL - unrated - Clean
  • Mimecast - unrated - Clean
  • Netcraft - unrated - Clean
  • OpenPhish - clean - Clean
  • PhishFort - unrated - Clean
  • Phishtank - clean - Clean
  • PREBYTES - clean - Clean
  • PrecisionSec - unrated - Clean
  • Quick Heal - clean - Clean
  • Quttera - clean - Clean
  • Rising - clean - Clean
  • SafeToOpen - unrated - Clean
  • Sangfor - clean - Clean
  • Sansec eComscan - unrated - Clean
  • Scantitan - clean - Clean
  • SCUMWARE.org - clean - Clean
  • Snort IP sample list - unrated - Clean
  • SOCRadar - unrated - Clean
  • Sophos - clean - Clean
  • StopForumSpam - clean - Clean
  • Sucuri SiteCheck - clean - Clean
  • ThreatHive - clean - Clean
  • URLhaus - clean - Clean
  • URLQuery - unrated - Clean
  • Viettel Threat Intelligence - clean - Clean
  • ViriBack - clean - Clean
  • VX Vault - clean - Clean
  • Xcitium Verdict Cloud - clean - Clean
  • Yandex Safebrowsing - clean - Clean
  • ZeroCERT - clean - Clean
  • ZeroFox - unrated - Clean

Security Scans

Browser Threat Feed
Not flagged on major threat lists

Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.

03 · Investigation Story

Investigation story

The behavior, reputation, and operator evidence that explains how this site may affect a visitor.
  1. What the site claims

    No page claim could be verified for wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd because no usable page content or saved capture was available.

  2. What we observed

    The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.

  3. What independent research found

    2 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.

  4. What remains unverified

    1 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.

Web research findings

Independent findings for wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.

Business registration
No public record found
Could not match the site to a registered company — common for small sites.
Clone check
No clone detected
The completed research found no supported clone indicator.
Typosquat check
No look-alike match
The completed research found no supported look-alike match.
Web mentions
1 scam report
Scam reports (1)
Direct quotes from public scam databases, forums, and news.
  • Gridinsoftopen

    "Gridinsoft currently classifies this site as Suspicious Website. The report highlights 7 blacklist detections"

Reputation Sources

How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.

Google Safe Browsing
Not listedCheck ↗
VirusTotal
ListedCheck ↗
AbuseIPDB
Not listedCheck ↗

04 · Domain & Infrastructure

Domain & infrastructure

Timeline · identity · encryption · redirects · hosting

The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.

Infrastructure map

How the saved page connected to the wider web.

  1. Domainwk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd
  2. Redirects towk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd
  3. Hosted byServers.com, Inc.

Domain Timeline

  1. Mar 23, 2026
    Domain registered

    First appeared in WHOIS records — 6 months old today.

  2. Sep 8, 2026
    Saved security review — Flagged as suspicious

    The completed checks from this saved scan are detailed above.

wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd was registered very recently and is already flagged. Freshly-registered domains are disproportionately used for scams, and a young domain with active threat signals warrants extra caution.

Domain & Encryption

Domain History
Age5 months old
RegistrarURL Solutions, Inc.
RegisteredMar 23, 2026
ExpiresMar 23, 2027
Owner privacyUnknown
Encryption Certificate
StatusInvalid
Protocolnone
IssuerNone
ExpiresInvalid Date (0d)
Self-signedNo
Hosting & Technology
HostingServers.com, Inc.
Server locationUS

Server Reputation

Abuse Intelligence
Confidence score0%
Reports on file0
ISPServers.com, Inc.
Usage typeData Center/Web Hosting/Transit

05 · Evidence Ledger

Evidence ledger

Coverage, provenance, and source freshness remain separate so a missing check is never mistaken for a clean result.
  1. Antiviruscomplete
  2. Browser threat feedcomplete
  3. Page contentpartial
  4. Analysiscomplete
  5. Visual evidenceunavailable
Completed analysis

The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.

Technical threat

suspicious

Malware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.

Additional evidence review · Additional evidence review

Operator / customer risk

suspicious

Complaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.

Additional evidence review

Source coverage and freshness

Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.

Antivirus
Result7 of 90 engines flagged
CompletionCompleted
FindingAdverse
Freshnessfresh · Sep 8, 2026
Browser protection
ResultNo browser threat-list match
CompletionCompleted
FindingNo adverse finding
FreshnessNot available
Page content
ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
CompletionLimited
FindingNo saved finding
FreshnessNot available
Visual evidence
ResultThe saved page capture was not reliable enough to use
CompletionUnavailable
FindingNo saved finding
FreshnessNot available
Independent research
Result2 independent findings were saved
CompletionCompleted
FindingAdverse
FreshnessNot available

06 · Your Next Move

Your next move

Proceed with caution

Our automated review flagged enough risk that you should treat this site as unverified.

  1. Analyst recommendation

    Avoid visiting the domain or entering information unless its purpose and safety can be independently verified; multiple current security detections warrant caution.

  2. Treat wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd as unverified

    Do not enter credentials or send money until you have independently verified the business.

  3. Verify the business through independent channels

    Check the company's social profiles, registry records, and search for recent news or reviews that are not hosted on the site itself.

  4. Never use irreversible payment methods

    Crypto, gift cards, wire transfers, and cash apps offer zero buyer protection. Use a credit card or PayPal if you must pay.

  5. Share your experience

    If you have additional context, drop a comment below or post on the MalwareTips forum.

    Open

07 · Safety FAQ

Safety FAQ

Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

Is wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd a scam or a legit website?
wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd shows strong warning signs of being a scam site — avoid interacting with it. 7 of 90 security engines flag it (4 as outright malicious). The domain is only 5 months old through URL Solutions, Inc. — a fresh registration is a classic scam fingerprint. It may not be an outright scam, but the risk is high enough that you should verify it independently before trusting it with money or data.
Is wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd safe to use?
wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd has a Safety Score of 34/100 (High Risk). Analysis coverage is complete at 100%. Avoid login, payment and downloads.
What should I do if I already gave my details to wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd?
If you've already paid or handed over details on wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd, act quickly. 1) Contact your bank or card issuer immediately and ask to dispute the charge or open a chargeback — the sooner you act, the better your odds. 2) Report the site to the U.S. FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov or the FBI's IC3 at ic3.gov, and in the UK to Action Fraud at actionfraud.police.uk. 3) If you entered a password, change it on wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd and anywhere you reused it, and turn on two-factor authentication. 4) Watch your bank and email for follow-up fraud, and keep screenshots as evidence.
Can I get my money back from wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd?
Often yes, if you act fast. Payments made by credit or debit card can frequently be reversed through a chargeback or dispute — contact your bank right away and explain it was a fraudulent site. Bank transfers and gift-card or voucher payments are much harder to recover, but you should still report them to your bank and to the FTC (reportfraud.ftc.gov) or Action Fraud (actionfraud.police.uk). Avoid any "refund" or "recovery" service that contacts you first — it's usually a follow-up scam.
Is my device at risk after visiting wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd?
Just viewing a scam page is usually low-risk on an up-to-date browser — the real danger is what it asks you to DO (enter details, download a file, send money). If you downloaded anything, run a full antivirus scan and treat the file as untrusted. If you entered a password or card number, change the password everywhere you reused it and contact your bank.
How do I report wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd?
You can report wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd through several official channels: the U.S. FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov, the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) at ic3.gov, and — in the UK — Action Fraud at actionfraud.police.uk. You can also flag it to Google Safe Browsing (safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish) so other browsers warn about it, and report it to the company being impersonated if there is one. Reporting helps get scam sites taken down faster.
Why does wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd look legitimate if it's a scam?
Modern scams are built to look convincing. A valid SSL padlock, a polished template, stock photos, fake reviews, and a trust badge can all be added in minutes and prove nothing about who runs the site. Scammers buy cheap domains, clone real designs, and copy legal pages wholesale. That's exactly why an automated review that checks the domain's age, hosting, blacklists, and behaviour — rather than just how the page looks — is more reliable than a first impression.
Has wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd been flagged by antivirus engines?
Yes. 7 of 90 antivirus and blocklist engines in our malware network flagged wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd, 4 of them as outright malicious. Even a single detection from a reputable engine is a meaningful warning, and multiple detections rarely happen by accident.
Is wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd on any phishing or malware blacklists?
No — wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd is not currently on the major browser blocklist feeds that Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Edge rely on. Note that blocklists can lag behind brand-new scam domains, so "not listed" is reassuring but not a guarantee on its own.
How old is the wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd domain?
wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd is 5 months old, registered on March 23, 2026 through URL Solutions, Inc.. Scam sites are very often freshly registered and short-lived, so an age under six months is a reason for extra caution.
Does wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd have a valid SSL certificate?
No — wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd has an invalid or broken SSL certificate, so browsers will show a security warning. Combined with the other signals, we recommend avoiding it.
How often is the wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd report updated?
This report is a record of the scan run on September 8, 2026, and the verdict reflects that point in time. Scam sites change fast — they can go live, get flagged, or vanish within days — so if you believe something about wk.sanpoiljejuna.cfd has changed, MalwareTips staff can run a fresh scan that re-checks every signal from scratch and republishes an updated verdict.

08 · Final Verdict

Final verdict

The saved conclusion, decisive evidence, and practical action in one final view.
Verdict score
34/100
High Risk

High risk: multiple security systems flag this domain

Saved capturewk.sanpoiljejuna.cfdCapture-safe
No saved screenshot was available for this report.
Conclusion

The domain's purpose and commercial model are unverified, but current scan evidence shows four malicious and three suspicious detections across 90 engines. A separate aggregate records adverse results from four antivirus families, supporting a High Risk rating despite one clean threat-list check.

Recommended actionAvoid visiting the domain or entering information unless its purpose and safety can be independently verified; multiple current security detections warrant caution.
Saved evidence only

Missing checks are never treated as a clean result.

Scan another URL
Continue toCommunity

09 · Community

Community

First-hand experiences add human context after the scanner has reached its conclusion.