File scan report
Verdict Malicious
Is sspm_ to_ txt. exe safe? No, we rate this exact file malicious.
The executable is flagged by 23 of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it, including four major antivirus engines, and it lacks a verified signature.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Strong evidence · Two or more major antivirus engines agree.
If you already ran it, follow the steps below.
What to do now4 steps
This file is harmful. Don't run it, and remove it.
If you haven't run it
Don't run this file. Delete it, then empty the Recycle Bin.
If you already ran it
Disconnect the device from the internet, then run a full antivirus scan. Microsoft Defender Offline (Windows Security > Virus & threat protection > Scan options) also finds malware that hides while Windows runs.
If you typed passwords on the device after running it, change them from another device you trust.
If the scan keeps finding it, or the device still acts strangely, scan again with a second-opinion scanner from another company; if that doesn't fix it, back up your personal files and reinstall Windows.
If you already ran it, do these in order.
If you opened or installed it
Avoid banking and sign-ins on that device until it is clean. These free MalwareTips guides walk you through it.
- Trojan removal guideClear steps for Windows, Mac and Android. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
23 of 70 flagged
- Flagged 23
- No detection 47
- No result 5
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 5mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
5 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
The detection volume is substantial: 23 of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it flag the executable, with Microsoft, Fortinet, Symantec, and TrendMicro-HouseCall contributing four major detections. Labels vary between Wacatac, ABTrojan, generic trojan, and machine-learning assessments, so the evidence supports a generic trojan assessment rather than a firmly identified family. The executable is unsigned and has no established signer history to offset these signals. No explicit sandbox malware verdict or malicious file it created was recorded, and the contacted IP was not covered by a saved host-reputation check, but those limitations do not outweigh the independent detections and offensive runtime indicators.
What We Detected
Twenty-three of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable. Four major antivirus engines contributed detections: Microsoft reported Wacatac, Fortinet reported PossibleThreat, Symantec reported a high-confidence machine-learning attribute, and TrendMicro-HouseCall reported a generic 64-bit trojan. The labels do not converge on one named family, but the breadth and quality of detection materially reduce the likelihood of an isolated false alarm.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox run mapped activity to T1055 process injection, T1485 data destruction, T1486 data encrypted for impact, and T1548 privilege escalation. The sample contacted 162.159.36.2 directly, but no complete host-reputation result is available because the contacted-host cross-check was not saved.
What To Do Now
Do not run the file on a production or personal system. Keep security software enabled, quarantine or remove the executable, and investigate any machine where it already ran for credential exposure, unusual programs it started, injected processes, and unexpected file changes.
Where this verdict could be wrong5 caveats
- Major antivirus engines do not agree on one malware family, and the four major detections do not agree on a named family.
- No sandbox returned a malicious verdict; the completed sandbox run did not issue an explicit malware verdict.
- No dropped file is known to be malicious, although all 10 inspected children have unknown verdicts rather than established clean results.
- No community YARA rule matched and the hash is not in the known-software reference database, providing no researcher-curated corroboration.
- BitDefender, Avast, AVG, Avira, DrWeb, and Emsisoft were among the engines that did not detect the sample.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- No strong major family consensus
- No explicit malicious sandbox verdict
- No inspected child was established as malicious
- No YARAify, CIRCL, or MalwareBazaar corroboration
- PE analysis found no likely packing or high-entropy code
- 23/70 antivirus detections
- Four major antivirus engines flag the executable
- Unsigned Win32 executable with no signer history
- Runtime mapping to process injection
- Runtime mappings to and impact techniques
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 13sandbox rule tags
- 4spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 31filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Note: Read the user name of the test computer.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Looked through folders on the test computer (most installers do this).
Note: Loaded extra code modules while running.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: Showed activity a sandbox rule links to file encryption; no ransomware behaviour was confirmed.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Threat context
How trojans work
A trojan pretends to be something useful or harmless so that you run it. Once open, it does its real job in the background, from stealing data to opening a back door or downloading more malware.
Bottom line:The disguise is the whole trick, so a trustworthy-looking name or icon means nothing.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run
sspm_to_txt.exe
0ada0cf0cc90c16bcb1e70ebb422cdb951738276abfe9b3c78b09a370d1f9e5d
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
sspm_to_txt.exe
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\sspm_to_txt.exe"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
sspm_to_txt.exe
C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\sspm_to_txt.exe
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
f.dll
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\onefile_5896_134220872339559298\f.dll
Test run - Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
_tkinter.pyd
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\onefile_5896_134220872339559298\_tkinter.pyd
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes 13 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 10 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
23 of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 23
- Fortinet (major engine)W32/PossibleThreat
- Microsoft (major engine)Trojan:Win32/Wacatac.B!ml
- Symantec (major engine)ML.Attribute.HighConfidence
- TrellixENS (major engine)Artemis!F880367D314D
- TrendMicro-HouseCall (major engine)Trojan.Win64.Gen.TL0101E226YU
- APEXMalicious
- BkavW32.Malware.1CF4FAB4
- CrowdStrikewin/malicious_confidence_70% (W)
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Sep 9, 2026, 10:45 PM UTC
- SHA-256
0ada0cf0cc90c16bcb1e70ebb422cdb951738276abfe9b3c78b09a370d1f9e5d- SHA-1
bd743aa6ff8abf816b1e0e7d0d99616acdd904d9- MD5
f880367d314dfae1faa011b1e6f65fa5
About this file
sspm_to_txt.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 5.2 MB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 5.2 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Apr 30, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 2 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 6.04 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 8 questions people ask most about this file.
Is sspm_to_txt.exe a virus?
What is sspm_to_txt.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected sspm_to_txt.exe?
What should I do if I already ran sspm_to_txt.exe?
How do I remove sspm_to_txt.exe?
What kind of malware is sspm_to_txt.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of sspm_to_txt.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of sspm_to_txt.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.