File scan report
Verdict Malicious
Is Aimbot. exe safe? No, we rate this exact file malicious.
The combined sandbox verdict identified malware, reinforced by four independent engine detections, although major antivirus engines and several corroborating checks found no…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · Several antivirus engines agree.
If you already ran it, follow the steps below.
What to do now4 steps
This file is harmful. Don't run it, and remove it.
If you haven't run it
Don't run this file. Delete it, then empty the Recycle Bin.
If you already ran it
Disconnect the device from the internet, then run a full antivirus scan. Microsoft Defender Offline (Windows Security > Virus & threat protection > Scan options) also finds malware that hides while Windows runs.
If you typed passwords on the device after running it, change them from another device you trust.
If the scan keeps finding it, or the device still acts strangely, scan again with a second-opinion scanner from another company; if that doesn't fix it, back up your personal files and reinstall Windows.
If you already ran it, do these in order.
If you opened or installed it
Avoid banking and sign-ins on that device until it is clean. These free MalwareTips guides walk you through it.
- Trojan removal guideClear steps for Windows, Mac and Android. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Antivirus results
4 of 70 flagged
- Flagged 4
- No detection 66
- No result 5
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 10mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
The combined sandbox verdict reported malware without a clean run recorded, and 4 of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it independently flagged the executable. Confidence is moderated because no major antivirus engines detected it, the labels are generic, and its 963-source prevalence plus lack of hard high-risk artefacts leave a meaningful false-positive possibility.
Four of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, including Skyhigh with a generic dropper-behavior label, but none of the major antivirus engines detected it. More importantly, the combined sandbox verdict reported malware and no clean sandbox result was recorded. The sandbox evidence does not identify a specific family or a hard high-risk artefact: had no named injection target, and the only recorded contact was analysis-environment background traffic. No malicious child, malicious contacted host, malware-specific community rule, or public malware-database listing supplied further corroboration. Broad prevalence across 963 distinct sources and silence from major antivirus engines create meaningful doubt, but they do not outweigh the unsplit malicious sandbox verdict together with four independent detections.
What We Detected
Four of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable. Skyhigh reported generic dropper-like behavior, while APEX, Bkav, and Cylance supplied generic malicious or unsafe labels; no major antivirus engines flagged it and no real malware family was identified.
Threat Behavior
The combined sandbox verdict reported malware, with no clean sandbox result recorded. However, the behavioral summary did not identify a named injection target, persistence, sample-generated network contact, or another concrete high-risk artefact. The T1055 mapping lacked the process target needed to establish observed injection, and the recorded network contact was background activity from the analysis environment.
What To Do Now
Do not run the executable on a normal system. Keep security software enabled, let your antivirus remove the file, and obtain it again only from a source whose identity and published checksum can be independently verified.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- None of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it' results included a detection from a major antivirus engine, and the four detections did not agree on a real malware family.
- The file has been submitted by 963 distinct sources, which is atypical of a narrowly distributed fresh threat.
- No named injection target, malicious contacted host, malicious file it created, malware-specific community rule, or public malware-database entry corroborated the sandbox label.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it' results included a detection from a major antivirus engine.
- The file has broad, established prevalence across 963 distinct submitters and 1,052 submissions.
- No malicious contacted host or malicious file it created was identified.
- No packing or unusually high-entropy code was reported.
- No malware-specific community rule or public malware-database entry matched the hash.
- The combined sandbox verdict reported malware and no clean sandbox result was recorded.
- Four independent engines flagged the executable, including one generic dropper-behavior detection.
- The executable is unsigned, so there is no verified publisher identity.
- The file name presents it as an aiming-assistance tool, but no confirmed publisher or official release match supports that identity.
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in 7 isolated tests; 1 test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 7isolated sandbox runs
- 18sandbox rule tags
- 5spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 33filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Note: Listed the programs running on the test computer.
Note: Deleted files or logs during the test run (installers often clean up after themselves).
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Looked through folders on the test computer (most installers do this).
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as contacting a server, but no contacted host was recorded.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Threat context
How trojans work
A trojan pretends to be something useful or harmless so that you run it. Once open, it does its real job in the background, from stealing data to opening a back door or downloading more malware.
Bottom line:The disguise is the whole trick, so a trustworthy-looking name or icon means nothing.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run
Aimbot.exe
0c6f5115b11e8cd424d99766bd537a6f4b128103f8c73d8a9119275363ae201c
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
software.exe
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\software.exe"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
cmd.exe
C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c "ver"
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
VCRUNTIME140.dll
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI52322\VCRUNTIME140.dll
Test run - Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
VCRUNTIME140_1.dll
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI52322\VCRUNTIME140_1.dll
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 18 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 10 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
4 of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 4
- APEXMalicious
- BkavW32.Malware.C573ADAC
- CylanceUnsafe
- SkyhighBehavesLike.Win64.Dropper.wc
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 25, 2026, 9:26 PM UTC
- SHA-256
0c6f5115b11e8cd424d99766bd537a6f4b128103f8c73d8a9119275363ae201c- SHA-1
d58c474b248529cbee4f308255da103647cd6bd1- MD5
e3cc104e61d883aece2d0c85c6e604d2
About this file
Aimbot.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 12.5 MB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 12.5 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Dec 7, 2025On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 963 distinct sources
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 5.95 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 8 questions people ask most about this file.
Is Aimbot.exe malware?
What is Aimbot.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected Aimbot.exe?
I already downloaded and ran Aimbot.exe — what should I do?
How do I remove Aimbot.exe?
What kind of malware is Aimbot.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Aimbot.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of Aimbot.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.