File scan report
Verdict Malicious
Is ??????? ?⮡? ??? ࠡ?⠫? ????. exe safe? No, we rate this exact file malicious.
This unsigned 64-bit Windows program is flagged by 36 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it, including 11 major ones, mostly as a trojan and by Microsoft as a game-hacking…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Strong evidence · Two or more major antivirus engines agree.
Do not run this program; delete it and keep your antivirus protection enabled. If it was already executed, run a full system scan.
What to do now4 steps
This file is harmful. Don't run it, and remove it.
If you haven't run it
Don't run this file. Delete it, then empty the Recycle Bin.
If you already ran it
Disconnect the device from the internet, then run a full antivirus scan. Microsoft Defender Offline (Windows Security > Virus & threat protection > Scan options) also finds malware that hides while Windows runs.
If you typed passwords on the device after running it, change them from another device you trust.
If the scan keeps finding it, or the device still acts strangely, scan again with a second-opinion scanner from another company; if that doesn't fix it, back up your personal files and reinstall Windows.
If you already ran it, do these in order.
If you opened or installed it
Avoid banking and sign-ins on that device until it is clean. These free MalwareTips guides walk you through it.
- Trojan removal guideClear steps for Windows, Mac and Android. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Antivirus results
36 of 71 flagged
- Flagged 36
- No detection 35
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 1y ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
5 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
Thirty-six of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag this unsigned executable, including Avira, ESET, BitDefender, Sophos, Symantec and TrendMicro. Microsoft calls it a game-hacking tool. Our sandbox runs observed no harmful activity, but the breadth of independent detections makes running it unsafe.
The file is detected by 36 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it, with 11 major detections from 27 independent scan engines. Most labels are generic trojan buckets. The Bodegun name comes mainly from one shared scan engine and its licensees, so no specific family is confirmed. Microsoft classifies it as a game-hacking tool, and Skyhigh's behavioural label suggests rootkit-like traits. The combined sandbox verdict was clean, with no injection or network activity from the sample, but this does not outweigh such broad detection. The program is unsigned and has no trusted publisher behind it.
What We Detected
36 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this unsigned 64-bit executable, 11 of them major. Avira and F-Secure report a generic Agent trojan; ESET, Sophos, Symantec and TrendMicro report generic trojan or high-confidence detections; BitDefender and its licensees report a Bodegun heuristic. Microsoft identifies it as a game-hacking tool.
Threat Behavior
The combined sandbox verdict was clean. They recorded no injection into other processes, no persistence and no network contacts beyond the analysis machine's own background traffic. The file is not packed. The detections point to a cheat or trojan-like utility whose harmful behaviour may not trigger in automated analysis.
What To Do Now
Do not run this file. Delete it, keep your antivirus enabled, and run a full system scan if it was already executed.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- Microsoft labels it a potentially unwanted game-hacking tool rather than a trojan, so it may be a cheat utility rather than classic malware.
- The combined sandbox verdict was clean, with no injection, persistence or network activity attributable to the sample.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- The combined sandbox verdict was clean with no injection or persistence observed
- Not packed or obfuscated
- Widely submitted for over a year
- Flagged by 36 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it, including 11 major antivirus engines
- Detections span many independent scan engines, mostly as trojans
- Microsoft identifies it as a game-hacking tool
- One engine reports rootkit-like behaviour traits
- No digital signature identifies the author
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in 5 isolated tests; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 5isolated sandbox runs
- 7sandbox rule tags
- 4spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 5filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Looked through folders on the test computer (most installers do this).
Note: Loaded extra code modules while running.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as contacting a server, but no contacted host was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as weakening security settings; no setting change was recorded.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Threat context
How trojans work
A trojan pretends to be something useful or harmless so that you run it. Once open, it does its real job in the background, from stealing data to opening a back door or downloading more malware.
Bottom line:The disguise is the whole trick, so a trustworthy-looking name or icon means nothing.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 4: FileSeen in the test run
??????? ?⮡? ??? ࠡ?⠫? ????.exe
4949e53622a7710748152d99d3a3ece928221093dc9daf18a9429bc47a035676
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 4: ProcessSeen in the test run
program.exe
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\program.exe"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 4: ProcessSeen in the test run
AlbanianVirus.exe
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 1
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 4: Written fileSeen in the test run
Logs
C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows Security Health\Logs
Test run
4 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 7 mapped techniques and every process, file, registry and network entry.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
36 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 36
- Avast (major engine)Win64:MalwareX-gen [Misc]
- AVG (major engine)Win64:MalwareX-gen [Misc]
- Avira (major engine)TR/W64.Agent
- BitDefender (major engine)Gen:Heur.Bodegun.1
- Emsisoft (major engine)Gen:Heur.Bodegun.1 (B)
- ESET-NOD32 (major engine)Generik.JWQAVZG trojan
- F-Secure (major engine)Trojan.TR/W64.Agent
- Fortinet (major engine)W32/PossibleThreat
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 22, 2026, 8:19 PM UTC
- SHA-256
4949e53622a7710748152d99d3a3ece928221093dc9daf18a9429bc47a035676- SHA-1
93447ea9eb98f6952b73d72a064978390c66a5bd- MD5
8bc071e0fa888f7bbede353521668144
About this file
??????? ?⮡? ??? ࠡ?⠫? ????.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 136.2 kB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 136.2 kB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Jul 14, 2025On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 606 distinct sources
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 5.99 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 8 questions people ask most about this file.
Is ??????? ?⮡? ??? ࠡ?⠫? ????.exe malware?
What is ??????? ?⮡? ??? ࠡ?⠫? ????.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected ??????? ?⮡? ??? ࠡ?⠫? ????.exe?
I already downloaded and ran ??????? ?⮡? ??? ࠡ?⠫? ????.exe — what should I do?
How do I remove ??????? ?⮡? ??? ࠡ?⠫? ????.exe?
What kind of malware is ??????? ?⮡? ??? ࠡ?⠫? ????.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of ??????? ?⮡? ??? ࠡ?⠫? ????.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of ??????? ?⮡? ??? ࠡ?⠫? ????.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.